Definitely something about the objectification of women, and what sort of role model they perceive beauty pageant contestants as being for girls/young women.
Many beauty contest contestants hope that it will lead to a career in show business, modeling or acting. Others hope it will help raise money for their education for other careers. So the contestants have a legitimate objective in competing. But that doesn't make the things any less dumb in the first place.
How is it any dumber than Jeopardy where people display their knowledge of mostly useless trivia?
If a person chooses to show off their body, they should have their choice respected. To blame them for objectifying themselves is a form of slut shaming and shows a lack of respect for their bodily sovereignty.
Surveys don't actually tell us how much sex the respondents have though, but rather how much they claim to have.
I recall hearing about a study where researchers compared how attaching the participants to a polygraph machine influenced their responses to questions about sexuality.
When participants thought they could get away with lying, males reported significantly more sexual partners than did females.
When they thought that their lies would be detected, females reported slightly more sexual partners than did males.
So what you're saying is I should only address the men in the room about a problem of social norms against women?
Problematic social norm under question being that we value beauty?So what you're saying is I should only address the men in the room about a problem of social norms against women?
I am having trouble seeing how we arrive at the conclusion that beauty pageants = objectification of women.According to the philosopher Martha Nussbaum, a person is objectified if they are treated:[1]
as a tool for another's purposes (instrumentality);
as if lacking in agency or self-determination (denial of autonomy, inertness);
as if owned by another (ownership);
as if interchangeable (fungibility);
as if permissible to damage or destroy (violability);
as if there is no need for concern for their feelings and experiences (denial of subjectivity).
The thing about people in the Feminist movement is that they want the two sexes to be treated exactly the same despite the fact that men and women are not the same and there's obvious differences in the way we act, prioritize, and think.
Problematic social norm under question being that we value beauty?
I am having trouble seeing how we arrive at the conclusion that beauty pageants = objectification of women.
Bolded for relevance. It's not a "most admirable woman" competition, it's a "who's prettiest" competition.
Could an ugly woman win? Is an ugly woman who enters and loses being told that she isn't as valuable to society because of her physical appearance, as dictated by a male-dominated society?