Quran Burning - Chaos Erupts In Afghanistan

Answer me something, contre (the question won't make sense to you until later, but I promise all will be made clear):

Do you support gay rights?

Yes, of course.

Though I'm not sure the comparison you're setting up is totally apt. I support the pastor's right to burn a Quran, that is after all freedom of speech. I don't support making a show of it when your intent is to cause riots elsewhere. If expressing my support of gay rights was libel to cause a riot, I would not like being shut up, but it would be within the rights of the police to stop me.

In the same sense, I have the right to burn the American flag in the US, but burning it on Memorial Day at a ceremony held at a war cemetery would probably not be covered by the First.

Ok may not be a mainstream , but the highly visible voices of the Islam seem to support harsh punishment for apostasy , blasphemy . As seen from the Danish cartoons , Salman Rushdie's books to this latest quran burning .
I wish the Islamic community stopped taking their religion so seriously or atleast develop tolerance towards criticism / defilement . There are peaceful ways to protest it .

p.s. Yes not only do i know Muslims. I have several Muslim friends . We discuss a lot of topics , and religion was never an important point of their identify .

Edit :
@Nedim : If you could provide me some links where any Islam scholar discusses about apostasy , blasphemy without calling for brutal punishments I would love to read it . Honest request not baiting you .

http://books.google.ca/books?id=HzF...nepage&q=Sufyan al-Thawri on apostasy&f=false

And that's from a guy who was born in 711.

The point is apostasy hasn't always, nor is today universally, a death sentence. After all, one of the most famous verses in the Quran, Al-Baqara 256, notes "there is no compulsion in religion."
 
As much as General Patreus if his reputation is anything to go by hates to say 'I told you so'...

Ok may not be a mainstream , but the highly visible voices of the Islam seem to support harsh punishment for apostasy , blasphemy . As seen from the Danish cartoons , Salman Rushdie's books to this latest quran burning .
I wish the Islamic community stopped taking their religion so seriously or atleast develop tolerance towards criticism / defilement . There are peaceful ways to protest it .

In other words: 'Some muslims with loud voices are terrorists. Muslims shouldn't take their religion so seriously' or 'I hate these Jehovah's Witnesses who come round my house, why do all those Christians take their religion so seriously?'
 
What, is this not enough PR for you ?
I highly dislike religious fanatics. The fact that the first douchebag is also one doesn't mean I think any better about the murderous retards that he refers to.
 
As much as General Patreus if his reputation is anything to go by hates to say 'I told you so'...



In other words: 'Some muslims with loud voices are terrorists. Muslims shouldn't take their religion so seriously' or 'I hate these Jehovah's Witnesses who come round my house, why do all those Christians take their religion so seriously?'

You're not comparing Jehovah's Witnesses to extremist Muslims who murdered a bunch of innocent people yesterday... did you?
 
Afghanistan will never be able to police itself, and us trying is simply laughable.

We should just cover the country in drone surveillance and declare it outlawed territory, and nip the next al-Qaeda training camps with a few hundred air fuel bombs. Intervention is pointless, and so is policing it on the ground.

Qur'an burning fools in US is just a very minor distraction. An insane one, but still just a distraction.

And finally, if the west so should choose to make this an Islam thing it will mutate into it. It's nothing to do with Islam and everything to do with a region composed of tribal cultures that loves to hurt themselves, and have done so for thousands of years.

Yes, I am sick of Afghanistan. And my heart cries for all the innocent women and children who will continue to suffer there.
 
You're not comparing Jehovah's Witnesses to extremist Muslims who murdered a bunch of innocent people yesterday... did you?

In that they're a tiny minority of their religion and yet far more vocal (at least where I live) than most of the rest put together - yes. The point is that you can't use the actions of some to give a lecture to the rest of them.
 
I think this incident just highlights the dangers of apparently unrestrained mob violence. It is present in any situation where the authorities are either too slow or deliberately don't act at all to control the protesters. There were similar demonstrations in Kabul, Herat, Bamian, and Kandahar. While some of the demonstrators there were quite angry as well, no mob violence occurred. This sort of mob violence happened all the time in Nazi Germany and in the South after the Civil War.

I also think that people are ignoring or downplaying the other factors which contributed to this incident. The US has been occupying Afghanistan for 9 years now. While Afghans were understandably upset over this one bigot's actions, they were really protesting for a multitude of reasons.

This Quran burning was just the trigger.

The Afghan people, who are enraged about the crimes committed by the US forces in their country and the Americans' insults against the sacred Islamic values, use every opportunity to display their resentment toward the US, and to condemn the blasphemous acts in this country.

In fact, thousands of Afghan people held huge demonstrations in Kandahar, on Saturday, blasting the insulting acts of an American priest, who desecrated Holy Qoran.

Hence, in the view of Afghan lawmakers and senators, the anti-US demonstrations in different Afghan cities signals a serious warning to the US and NATO.

From 2009:


Link to video.

Posters of Saddam Hussein, Iran's Ayatollah Khomeini, leaders who stood against the US government, are popular.
What certainly won't change are those who hate Islam and look for any excuse to vilify a mainstream religion practiced by over one billion people.
 
That pastor's action was dumb and irresponsible. He had right to do it, esp. since burning etc Bible is nothing special these days. But it was irresponsible, because one knows such thing would happen. Still, it was not him to kill these people. And in fact the response only proves that there's a problem with radicalism within islam.

Yes, of course.

The point is apostasy hasn't always, nor is today universally, a death sentence. After all, one of the most famous verses in the Quran, Al-Baqara 256, notes "there is no compulsion in religion."


Also, it is claimed by many muslims that "freedom of religion" does not encompass freedom to renounce islam. Indeed, muslim countries were against mentioning changing religion as a human right by UN. May I cite another part of Al-Qur'an, which is more precise:
"They wish that you reject Faith, as they have rejected, and thus that you all become like one another. So take not friends from them, till they emigrate in the way of Allah. But if they turn back (from islam), take them and kill them wherever you find them, and take neither friends not helpers from them." An-Nisa' 89

The hadiths have some proofs as what is ordained for apostates as well.
One brings us a story about people who denounced islam and killed some shephard. Muhammad ordered their hands and feet cut off (and left not cauterised), their eyes branded with a piece of iron. After which they were left that way until they died in agony.
in another, Muhammad is displeased with Ali who burned an apostate. But not for killing him: no, that he orders himself. But for using fire.



As much as General Patreus if his reputation is anything to go by hates to say 'I told you so'...
In other words: 'Some muslims with loud voices are terrorists. Muslims shouldn't take their religion so seriously' or 'I hate these Jehovah's Witnesses who come round my house, why do all those Christians take their religion so seriously?'

Completely erroneous comparison.
 
In that they're a tiny minority of their religion and yet far more vocal (at least where I live) than most of the rest put together - yes. The point is that you can't use the actions of some to give a lecture to the rest of them.

This doesn't make any sense! :crazyeye:
 
And we find the usual suspects here trying to push their anti-Islamic agenda. Voices from Eastern Europe are joining the Western chorus too - not enough Gypsies to hate these days? :lol:

Well it is just not about crazy muslims . The mainstream muslims do not oppose death penalty for apostasy

From wiki
In many countries apostasy from the religion supported by the state is explicitly forbidden. This is largely the case in some states where Islam is the state religion; conversion to Islam is encouraged, conversion from Islam penalised.

Iran – illegal (death penalty)[citation needed]
Saudi Arabia – illegal (death penalty)[citation needed]
Nigeria – illegal in twelve of 37 states (death penalty)[citation needed]
Syria – illegal (death penalty)[citation needed]
Qatar – illegal (death penalty)[citation needed]
Sudan – illegal (death penalty)[citation needed]
Mauritania – illegal (death penalty)[citation needed]
Afghanistan – illegal (death penalty)[citation needed]
Somalia – illegal (death penalty)[citation needed]
Yemen – illegal (death penalty)[citation needed]
United Arab Emirates – illegal (death penalty) [8]
Malaysia – illegal in five of 13 states (fine, imprisonment, and flogging)[9][10]
Pakistan – illegal (death penalty since 2007)

And for Blasphemy .

If you are so confident in your religion why do you need the strong arm tactics to suppress any protest/criticism / defilement of your religion , religious symbols . Is your religion that weak ? .

Crappy crazy countries with crazy laws. Any surprise? Incidentally, the most populous Muslim country is missing from that list. Also, I think Pakistan's case is a bit contentious.
 
What's "mainstream"? And what number of adherents have to do with anything?
In other words why shouldn't people vilify Islam for the acts of a handful of people, many of whom were responding to entirely secular issues?
 
Protestants... :shake:

This is not all Protestants.... I am a Protestant of sorts (I don't really call myself one) but I don't burn Qu'rans:p

They have full support to burn those qurans from me. Every quran they buy to burn gives more money to the muslim community. Also the quran says that if you must destroy it, burn it, so thanks for doing it the islamic way

:lol: that is too funny.

@Aelf- Wikipedia is wrong on Syria, proselyting from Islam is technically allowed there (It is discouraged and sometimes family persecution occurs, but no Death Penalty for it), I wouldn't call Somalia's militia killing you a death penalty, more like a murder, and I'll assume the rest of them are right since I don't know. However, I have a strong suspicion Pakistan's info is incorrect.
 
Completely erroneous comparison.

OK, again, maybe it's a bit unfair to compare the most hated religious sect in Britain to al-Queda, but I think the point that tarring a whole religion with the brush invited by their extremists is unfair. In the same way I doubt many atheists would be too happy with being accused of thinking, a la Dawkins (although I may be called out on this one), that religion was a force for evil in the world.

Why?? Arabs and Muslims burn the American Flag all the time. If they have the right to burn our holy symbols, we have the right to burn theirs. It's long past time they learned that.

Come on then, I'll bite - even with the premise that 'arabs and muslims burn' means 'all arabs and all muslims support the burning of', why should 'one nation under God', whose son let us not forget gave us 'turn the other cheek', lower itself to their level?
 
Why?? Arabs and Muslims burn the American Flag all the time. If they have the right to burn our holy symbols, we have the right to burn theirs. It's long past time they learned that.

(go ahead....ask the question that just popped into your mind after reading the underlined part. I've got a counter all planned out)
You consider the American Flag to be a holy symbol? Serious question.
 
Back
Top Bottom