Delvemor
Warlord
- Joined
- Feb 8, 2020
- Messages
- 266
At some point I was playing the Mayans a lot and got used to simply focus on reforming first and then just getting a Great Prophet from their UA to enhance in the meantime. Then I started playing other civs and realized that trying to spread your religion to the point that you can reform after you enhance is significantly harder than if you just reform first when most civs and City-States don't have a religion yet. So I came back to reforming first, possibly getting the enhancing from Hagia Sophia when possible, or just waiting to get a second Great Prophet after Reformation. I'm still able to "get away with it" on Immortal difficulty, but it seems to me most people are enhancing before reforming from what I can get read on the forums. And it would make sense since enhancing gives you 2 more beliefs instead of just one for reforming, even though Reformation beliefs are still quite strong on their own.
So what do you think? Am I "crazy" to do this or the right way most of the time is to enhance before you reform? At the same time it seems to me that you should spread you religion to your own cities soon enough that the AIs don't decide to "enlighten" your atheist populace before you do so yourself. So that aspect reinforces my view that trying to spread your religion as much as possible early with just missionaries is still sensible.
So what do you think? Am I "crazy" to do this or the right way most of the time is to enhance before you reform? At the same time it seems to me that you should spread you religion to your own cities soon enough that the AIs don't decide to "enlighten" your atheist populace before you do so yourself. So that aspect reinforces my view that trying to spread your religion as much as possible early with just missionaries is still sensible.