Representation earlier please

what should representation come after? (tech)

  • vassalage

    Votes: 2 5.0%
  • civil service

    Votes: 7 17.5%
  • liberalism

    Votes: 13 32.5%
  • other

    Votes: 18 45.0%

  • Total voters
    40

kristopherb

Protective/Charismatic
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
2,214
Location
British Empire Soul:Tesco
Am i theonly one that wants Representation ealier?
 

RockTheCazbah87

Pacal's pal
Joined
May 28, 2007
Messages
649
Location
Manhattan, NY
Well it would be nice to see it earlier, but I don't mind waiting.

Maybe you could make a point of building the Pyramids every game?
 

LiberiGlacialis

To the stars!
Joined
Sep 6, 2007
Messages
360
Location
Online, for crying out loud!
Um, it already has an way to come early: Pyramids....>>
 

kristopherb

Protective/Charismatic
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
2,214
Location
British Empire Soul:Tesco
Well it would be nice to see it earlier, but I don't mind waiting.

Maybe you could make a point of building the Pyramids every game?

but building it for that reason is kind of annoying
poll up
 

Handel

Prince
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
514
May I get battleships, choppers and armor earlier too? Better when the other still have archers!
 

kristopherb

Protective/Charismatic
Joined
May 23, 2006
Messages
2,214
Location
British Empire Soul:Tesco
no what i mean is if you miss the mids theres a large gap between monach and rep'
 

johnny_rico

one more turn addict
Joined
Jan 23, 2006
Messages
627
Location
MN
no what i mean is if you miss the mids theres a large gap between monach and rep'

It's also easy enough to get constitution with liberalism in BtS. You don't have to wait too long for representation.
 

LightSpectra

me autem minui
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
5,518
Location
Vendée
Republics have existed long before constitutions have.

Though balance-wise, I guess it's fine where it is.
 

Draknith

King
Joined
Jul 12, 2007
Messages
670
Location
Chicago Suburbs
Think about it though. Athens had a democracy well before the game allows you to have it, but then again it was only a democracy of one city. I think the game trys to portray the historical changes from when single rulers were the dominant governments to more representative governments that became the standard later in history. Of course there's Athens, and Rome with it's Republic, but even Rome decended into and empire with one ultimate leader and the main standard for governments were still single leaders or tribal governments during those periods.
 

mrt144

Deity
Joined
Jan 27, 2007
Messages
11,121
Location
Seattle
I think the problem with it being any earlier is that under a SE it is an absolute beast. . at the point it comes at, there might be some practicle reasons both happiness and specialist wise, but the CE becomes stronger when you have more cities and the requisite techs to get the most from a Town.
 

Shoot the Moon

Playing World in Conflict
Joined
Dec 24, 2005
Messages
708
I think it is fine where it is. You can either chose to put the effort to get it ASAP with the pyramids or wait a bit. I think it would be unbalancing any earlier.
 

Gyprsn

Warlord
Joined
Jul 8, 2007
Messages
149
Location
Phoenix, Arizona, US
I think it should come earlier as well :/ there really is a big gap between the first government civic and the second. And Constitution is off the usual tech track (I try to get it as early as possible when doing SE of course, but otherwise I can live without it, along with everyone else in multiplayer games, until we need emancipation, which doesn't even come with constitution).

I don't think that vassalage, civil service, or Liberalism are good techs to do this with :/ I would rather the tech just come a little earlier (maybe before nationalism?). However, I think that having monarchy for so long is very realistic in real-history terms, and I could live with the current set up.
 
Joined
Jul 28, 2006
Messages
4,016
Trouble is, right now representation is too close to universal suffrage to do any good. Without the Pyramids early on, you're almost universally (pardon the pun) better off going with US than REP late in the game, unless you have lots of specialists or wonders which grant them (or other bonuses to them in conjunction with REP). But again, this is the late game, where SE becomes less important, so it's a law of diminishing returns.

Having said that, pushing representation in its current form back to "aesthetics" or something might make it too powerful. Ancient democracies seemed to survive only in smaller nations, and once they acquired huge empires they tended to degenerate into oligarchies/monarchies/etc., like Rome.
 

Peng Qi

Emperor
Joined
Aug 19, 2007
Messages
1,431
Location
Irrelevant.
If we wanted to represent history better, Representation would need to be able to arrive about 500 BC at the latest; earlier if you wanted it to represent Greece's democracies, too. I'd say place it with Alphabet.

Honestly, I'd like to see a few more government civics. Republic, City States, and Oligarchy are not currently represented in a manner befitting their roles in history.
 
Top Bottom