Crezth
i knew you were a real man of the left
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_...thern_voters_bolster_its_chances_.single.html
Alt. Thread Title: "Republicans Are All Literally Nazis, Some Say"
The notion that the GOP is racist or has racist elements in spades is not a new notion, but I've noticed on this forum and elsewhere that it is habitual to dismiss any such cries of Republican racism as apologist whining. Indeed, they say, the Republicans are the ones who aren't racist, because they refuse to get hung up on it!
But without getting overtly preachy, there does seem to be a preponderance of evidence that suggests that Republicans, even if they aren't all literally Klan members, depend on prevailing attitudes of racism to maintain some of their political clout.
In my opinion, the assumptions this article makes are essentially correct. And as a friend put it, "You can make a strong case that promoting a racist party makes you a racist by the transitive property of screw you."
Slate.com said:I’ve spent some time putting “truth” claims and false equivalencies in perspective because I want to test the theory that there is one truth in political discourse that the media has almost entirely failed to recognize or fears to utter, one at the heart of presidential campaign reporting: The Republican Party is an institutionally, structurally racist entity. It’s the veritable elephant in the room of campaign coverage.
No, I’m not saying all Republicans are racist. I’m saying that as a party, ever since Goldwater and Nixon concocted the benighted, openly racist “Southern Strategy” in the ’60s, the Republican Party has profited from overt and covert racism.
The Southern Strategy was designed to capitalize on Southern white resentment of court-enforced busing to end school desegregation, of the 1964 Civil Rights Act's prohibition of discrimination in interstate commerce, of enforcement of the 1965 Voting Rights Act to prevent historically racist Southern counties and states from discriminating against blacks who sought to exercise their right to vote where once they'd been effectively barred. By playing on these issues, Nixon and other Republicans of this era won many traditionally Democratic votes in the South. Later, GOP opposition to affirmative action, race-based hiring "quotas" and all other methods of compensating for the debilitating legacy of slavery, Jim Crow and segregation fed into what was one of the momentous shifts, a total turnaround in just more than a decade (1970 to 1984) from a solidly Democratic South to a solidly Republican one.
[...]
Looked at another way, as things stand, there would be no presidential "race" at the moment if it weren't for those ex-confederate states—even if they split their votes. Mitt Romney would have little or no chance of winning and might as well quit the race now. Nor would the GOP have much chance of re-taking the Senate or even winning the House again. They would be dead as a political party if not for the legacy of racism. I think that's a fact.
Alt. Thread Title: "Republicans Are All Literally Nazis, Some Say"
The notion that the GOP is racist or has racist elements in spades is not a new notion, but I've noticed on this forum and elsewhere that it is habitual to dismiss any such cries of Republican racism as apologist whining. Indeed, they say, the Republicans are the ones who aren't racist, because they refuse to get hung up on it!
But without getting overtly preachy, there does seem to be a preponderance of evidence that suggests that Republicans, even if they aren't all literally Klan members, depend on prevailing attitudes of racism to maintain some of their political clout.
In my opinion, the assumptions this article makes are essentially correct. And as a friend put it, "You can make a strong case that promoting a racist party makes you a racist by the transitive property of screw you."