Republicans That Jammed NH Democrat Calls Have Contacts in the Bush Administration

Dr. Yoshi

Emperor of the Universe
Joined
Jul 10, 2003
Messages
1,220
Location
Hermosa Beach, California
http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/04/11/election.phonejamming.ap/index.html

CNN said:
Records: Official convicted of phone jamming called White House

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Key figures in a phone-jamming scheme designed to keep New Hampshire Democrats from voting in 2002 had regular contact with the White House and Republican Party as the plan was unfolding, phone records introduced in criminal court show.

The records show that Bush campaign operative James Tobin, who recently was convicted in the case, made two dozen calls to the White House within a three-day period around Election Day 2002 -- as the phone jamming operation was finalized, carried out and then abruptly shut down.

The national Republican Party, which paid millions in legal bills to defend Tobin, says the contacts involved routine election business and that it was "preposterous" to suggest the calls involved phone jamming.

The Justice Department has secured three convictions in the case but hasn't accused any White House or national Republican officials of wrongdoing, nor made any allegations suggesting party officials outside of New Hampshire were involved. The phone records of calls to the White House were exhibits in Tobin's trial but prosecutors did not make them part of their case.

Democrats plan to ask a New Hampshire judge Tuesday to order GOP and White House officials to answer questions about the phone jamming in a civil lawsuit alleging voter fraud.

Repeated hang-up calls that jammed telephone lines at a Democratic get-out-the-vote center occurred in a Senate race in which Republican John Sununu defeated Democrat Jeanne Shaheen, 51 percent to 46 percent, on November 5, 2002.

Besides the conviction of Tobin, the Republicans' New England regional director, prosecutors negotiated two plea bargains: one with a New Hampshire Republican Party official and another with the owner of a telemarketing firm involved in the scheme. The owner of the subcontractor firm whose employees made the hang-up calls is under indictment.

The phone records show that most calls to the White House were from Tobin, who became President Bush's presidential campaign chairman for the New England region in 2004. Other calls from New Hampshire senatorial campaign offices to the White House could have been made by a number of people.

A GOP campaign consultant in 2002, Jayne Millerick, made a 17-minute call to the White House on Election Day, but said in an interview she did not recall the subject. Millerick, who later became the New Hampshire GOP chairwoman, said in an interview she did not learn of the jamming until after the election.

A Democratic analysis of phone records introduced at Tobin's criminal trial show he made 115 outgoing calls -- mostly to the same number in the White House political affairs office -- between September 17 and November 22, 2002. Two dozen of the calls were made from 9:28 a.m. the day before the election through 2:17 a.m. the night after the voting.

There also were other calls between Republican officials during the period that the scheme was hatched and canceled.

Prosecutors did not need the White House calls to convict Tobin and negotiate the two guilty pleas.

Whatever the reason for not using the White House records, prosecutors "tried a very narrow case," said Paul Twomey, who represented the Democratic Party in the criminal and civil cases. The Justice Department did not say why the White House records were not used.

The Democrats said in their civil case motion that they were entitled to know the purpose of the calls to government offices "at the time of the planning and implementation of the phone-jamming conspiracy ... and the timing of the phone calls made by Mr. Tobin on Election Day."

While national Republican officials have said they deplore such operations, the Republican National Committee said it paid for Tobin's defense because he is a longtime supporter and told officials he had committed no crime.

By November 4, 2002, the Monday before the election, an Idaho firm was hired to make the hang-up calls. The Republican state chairman at the time, John Dowd, said in an interview he learned of the scheme that day and tried to stop it.

Dowd, who blamed an aide for devising the scheme without his knowledge, contended that the jamming began on Election Day despite his efforts. A police report confirmed the Manchester Professional Fire Fighters Association reported the hang-up calls began about 7:15 a.m. and continued for about two hours. The association was offering rides to the polls.

Virtually all the calls to the White House went to the same number, which currently rings inside the political affairs office. In 2002, White House political affairs was led by now-RNC chairman Ken Mehlman. The White House declined to say which staffer was assigned that phone number in 2002.

"As policy, we don't discuss ongoing legal proceedings within the courts," White House spokesman Ken Lisaius said.

Robert Kelner, a Washington lawyer representing the Republican National Committee in the civil litigation, said there was no connection between the phone jamming operation and the calls to the White House and party officials.

"On Election Day, as anybody involved in politics knows, there's a tremendous volume of calls between political operatives in the field and political operatives in Washington," Kelner said.

"If all you're pointing out is calls between Republican National Committee regional political officials and the White House political office on Election Day, you're pointing out nothing that hasn't been true on every Election Day," he said.

Democratic National Committee spokesman Damien LaVera said Monday: "With every development in this case, there are new questions about the extent to which key national Republicans had knowledge of or were involved in a criminal scheme to keep New Hampshire voters from getting to the polls. The American people have a right to know whether the White House political director, who today sits as chairman of the national Republican Party, had any hand in it."

Well, if it turns out Bush himself had any involvement in this, there will be an impeachment hearing for sure.
 
Is there any proof that Bush knew, or authorized these phone jammings? Idle speculation doesn't count.
 
the article said:
The Justice Department has secured three convictions in the case but hasn't accused any White House or national Republican officials of wrongdoing, nor made any allegations suggesting party officials outside of New Hampshire were involved. The phone records of calls to the White House were exhibits in Tobin's trial but prosecutors did not make them part of their case.

So, basically, this doesn't really have anything to do with the President, but it makes a better story this way? Call it messing with an election, but don't make suggestions when reporting the news (yes, I know the news does that regularly).
 
Elrohir said:
Is there any proof that Bush knew, or authorized these phone jammings? Idle speculation doesn't count.
Before the Oval Office tapes became public that's the way people defended Nixon. This administration is resembling that one more and more with their 'dirty tricks' and finally people are seeing it.

On one hand I can't wait for November to hurry up and get here, but then again every week brings a new present. :thanx:
 
1. Get over the election already. Why are there complaints about every single election?

2. There has been no proof that the President was involved, or that the call was even about the jamming.
 
hm, funny - the second anything mildly critical of Bush pops up - and this is at the very least proof that the Republican party is no good at tsicking to the law, and keeping its important members to stick to the law as far as elections are concerned - a bunch of people here rush in with the usual defences. This screams to me that these people think Bush is guilty as hell - why else this immediate, adamant and - mostly - idle emesis of excuses and 'it ain't proven's?
 
Because it seems that rather than dealing with an election misconduct issue, y'all are trying to stick something on the President. If you think our democracy is ailing, diagnosing every problem as "The President" will not help the patient get any better.
 
There will be no Bush impeachment.

bush84_sm.jpg
 
Red Stranger said:
What is the picture supposed to mean?
It appears that the digits crossed out are "'84" - a reference to George Orwell's famous novel. Does that help?
 
Irish Caesar said:
Because it seems that rather than dealing with an election misconduct issue, y'all are trying to stick something on the President. If you think our democracy is ailing, diagnosing every problem as "The President" will not help the patient get any better.
At what point does the President bacome responcible for the actions of his subordinates? Is it only if knows of their actions beforhanor if he covers up for them after learning of it. Is he responcible for the bad choices he made in hiring them? Or is he like the captain of a ship, he goes down regardless.

Certainly he is the figurehead on this administration whether or not he is actualy in charge or not.
 
Kayak said:
At what point does the President bacome responcible for the actions of his subordinates?

When they act on his orders. It appears that this is a case involving the RNC, although I'm not certain.

Is it only if knows of their actions beforhanor if he covers up for them after learning of it.

I don't think he's doing either. Neither of those would be a "good" thing to do, of course.

Is he responcible for the bad choices he made in hiring them?

Depends. How many people does he hire than don't have to be approved by someone else, too?

Or is he like the captain of a ship, he goes down regardless.

Certainly he is the figurehead on this administration whether or not he is actualy in charge or not.

Washington had a good idea with the anti-political party policy. Unfortunately, he had no way to implement it once he picked his Cabinet.
 
Top Bottom