First of all, I respect what DS is doing here, as the argumentation for one side has been very one-sided on the discussion level.
I also like the notion that DS wants to give us the room for a deep discussion on long term strategy, but I have sent in my CC on a completely different, yet related issue, and that is the mishandling of the technology poll.
I retain the Citizens Complaint, until the science chief decides otherwise with the interpretation of this poll. I can also play this "politically correctness game", as I stand nothing to lose.
Equality before the law is something that has become real important, now knowing the inherent flawed consistency of morals in this game. I am sick and tired seeing rules count different by the person, so this will go on till the Judiciary makes a judgment. I have seen many crazy judiciary motions, but I know this is a sound and valid one.
DS poll is covering something else than not consulting citizen input, it is more about the direction the discussions has gone, and is a completely different topic. Sorry Grant, the request is rejected, and I am only a citizen here, you owe me nothing, I owe you nothing. Law is what matters here. I also see that you want to ignore the tech-poll outcome, "nice" move to ask me to remove the citizens complaint (but that is not going to happen, thanks to the situation at hand), and I do not fall into any of your traps anymore. I do not take orders (especially not given disrespectfully in 3rd person) from you anymore, ever!
Of course you will make this poll count, and not what is the real case. You actually voted continue, but that is not a valid argument, as the majority seems to go for Democracy, but with Engineering first. This is what I filed the CC for.
Please listen to citizen input! Do we want a Kangaroo Court, or some equality to the law?
It is as simply as 5+2 vs 5+1, and I would let the court decide that.