CivPartisan
King
R E V I E W F O R M A T
===========================================
SCENARIO REVIEW FORM v1.01
[Instructions - delete off any portion that is in square brackets, including this. In each section, answer any five of six questions and delete off the unanswered question. In some cases, a simple Yes or NO will be sufficient. You may assign one, half or zero points to each question. In cases where more than one question of a section is irrelevant, you can pro-rate the result to fit the scoring scheme.]
Name of Scenario : XXX
Final Score : XXX / 30
Type of Scenario : XXX [historical, fantasy etc...]
Name of Author: XXX
Name of Reviewer: XXX
Summary of Scenario:
XXX
Playability - Section Sub-total: XXX
Were you able to finish in a reasonable amount of turns? (Score: X )
Did the scenario avoid being tedious or repetitive? (Score: X )
Did the scenario capture the essence of what it was suppose to portray? (Score: X )
Were you impressed with the overall sound effects? (Score: X )
Was the choice of and interaction between races appropriate? (Score: X )
Did you enjoy playing the scenario? (Score: X )
Units - Section Sub-total: XXX
Were the majority of units changed from the default Civ2 units? (Score: X )
Were all of the sounds appropriate for the units in the scenario? (Score: X )
Was the scenario free of 'unbalanced' units? (Score: X )
Were there innovative combinations of special unit abilities? (Score: X )
Were Barbarian units appropriate when they appeared? (Score: X )
Any other unit related problems (like shield placement)? (Score: X )
Research - - Section Sub-total: XXX
Was the progression of advance to advance done properly? (Score: X )
Were advances properly related to new units and obsolescence? (Score: X )
Was the tech tree of a high level of complexity? (Score: X )
Were non-event messages amended to suit the scenario ? (Score: X )
Was the civilpedia properly updated? (Score: X )
Were there disfunctional improvements or useless technologies? (Score: X )
Map & Terrain - Section Sub-total: XXX
Were you impressed by the Map in general? (Score: X )
Was terrain properly adjusted to fit the scenario? (Score: X )
Was attention given to geography and historical details? (Score: X )
Were you happy with the city, fortress, terrain improvement graphics? (Score: X )
Were city names and the placement of cities correct? (Score: X )
Were there innovations used in relation to Terrain? (Score: X )
Care & Details - Section Sub-total: XXX
Did you find the documentation adequate? (Score: X )
Was the events file sufficient for the needs of the scenario? (Score: X )
Were you happy with the improvement and wonder icons? (Score: X )
Did you like the changes to the player interface? (Score: X )
Did you find any very apparent errors in any category of the scenario? (Score: X )
Do you think a lot of effort was put into doing this scenario? (Score: X )
Originality and Technical Proficiency - Section Sub-total: XXX
Were the sounds appropriate in volume and clear enough to understand? (Score: X )
Were the sounds unique and different in the scenario? (Score: X )
Did you discover many unit GRAPHICS not used in any other scenarios? (Score: X )
Is the theme of the scenario completely novel? (Score: X )
Were complex events used to carry the story line or enhance the AI? (Score: X )
Did the author deal with all areas which could be modified? (Score: X )
Any other innovations worth mentioning? Explain? (no actual score here)
Overall Assesment and Other Points of Interest:
XXX
[You can also make adjustments here to the total score for factors not taken into account]
==========
v1.01
===========================================
SCENARIO REVIEW FORM v1.01
[Instructions - delete off any portion that is in square brackets, including this. In each section, answer any five of six questions and delete off the unanswered question. In some cases, a simple Yes or NO will be sufficient. You may assign one, half or zero points to each question. In cases where more than one question of a section is irrelevant, you can pro-rate the result to fit the scoring scheme.]
Name of Scenario : XXX
Final Score : XXX / 30
Type of Scenario : XXX [historical, fantasy etc...]
Name of Author: XXX
Name of Reviewer: XXX
Summary of Scenario:
XXX
Playability - Section Sub-total: XXX
Were you able to finish in a reasonable amount of turns? (Score: X )
Did the scenario avoid being tedious or repetitive? (Score: X )
Did the scenario capture the essence of what it was suppose to portray? (Score: X )
Were you impressed with the overall sound effects? (Score: X )
Was the choice of and interaction between races appropriate? (Score: X )
Did you enjoy playing the scenario? (Score: X )
Units - Section Sub-total: XXX
Were the majority of units changed from the default Civ2 units? (Score: X )
Were all of the sounds appropriate for the units in the scenario? (Score: X )
Was the scenario free of 'unbalanced' units? (Score: X )
Were there innovative combinations of special unit abilities? (Score: X )
Were Barbarian units appropriate when they appeared? (Score: X )
Any other unit related problems (like shield placement)? (Score: X )
Research - - Section Sub-total: XXX
Was the progression of advance to advance done properly? (Score: X )
Were advances properly related to new units and obsolescence? (Score: X )
Was the tech tree of a high level of complexity? (Score: X )
Were non-event messages amended to suit the scenario ? (Score: X )
Was the civilpedia properly updated? (Score: X )
Were there disfunctional improvements or useless technologies? (Score: X )
Map & Terrain - Section Sub-total: XXX
Were you impressed by the Map in general? (Score: X )
Was terrain properly adjusted to fit the scenario? (Score: X )
Was attention given to geography and historical details? (Score: X )
Were you happy with the city, fortress, terrain improvement graphics? (Score: X )
Were city names and the placement of cities correct? (Score: X )
Were there innovations used in relation to Terrain? (Score: X )
Care & Details - Section Sub-total: XXX
Did you find the documentation adequate? (Score: X )
Was the events file sufficient for the needs of the scenario? (Score: X )
Were you happy with the improvement and wonder icons? (Score: X )
Did you like the changes to the player interface? (Score: X )
Did you find any very apparent errors in any category of the scenario? (Score: X )
Do you think a lot of effort was put into doing this scenario? (Score: X )
Originality and Technical Proficiency - Section Sub-total: XXX
Were the sounds appropriate in volume and clear enough to understand? (Score: X )
Were the sounds unique and different in the scenario? (Score: X )
Did you discover many unit GRAPHICS not used in any other scenarios? (Score: X )
Is the theme of the scenario completely novel? (Score: X )
Were complex events used to carry the story line or enhance the AI? (Score: X )
Did the author deal with all areas which could be modified? (Score: X )
Any other innovations worth mentioning? Explain? (no actual score here)
Overall Assesment and Other Points of Interest:
XXX
[You can also make adjustments here to the total score for factors not taken into account]
==========
v1.01
