1. We have added the ability to collapse/expand forum categories and widgets on forum home.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. All Civ avatars are brought back and available for selection in the Avatar Gallery! There are 945 avatars total.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. To make the site more secure, we have installed SSL certificates and enabled HTTPS for both the main site and forums.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. Civ6 is released! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Dismiss Notice
  6. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice

RFCE 2.0 brainstorming thread

Discussion in 'Rhye's and Fall: Europe' started by AbsintheRed, Mar 6, 2012.

  1. AbsintheRed

    AbsintheRed Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    8,083
    Location:
    Szeged, Hungary
    Moderator Action: New Opening Post inserted into thread
    --Ozbenno
     
    Last edited by a moderator: May 12, 2017
  2. Morholt

    Morholt Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    440
    Location:
    Swedish Empire
    RFCE 1.0 is out and everyone is happy. However there were lots of things that we wanted to do but was put aside due to time and scope concerns. Some of those things were put into RFCE++ which was developed in parallel, some were simply not possible without drastically reworking the map.

    Anyways we will now start working piece by piece on RFCE 2.0 and since people are already having ideas it might be a good idea to have a single brainstorming thread. Note that there is a separate thread about the new map here. The general shape and size of the map is all but decided, it will be almost twice as big as the old one tile-wise and will include more of Egypt, the Caucasus and the Volga.

    Most parts of RFCE++ will probably make it in as well. That means a whole load of new civs, Unions, and HRE. The last two especially are still up for debate, what are people's idea on those.

    We've also been talking about what additional civs we would like in. So far we've got Armenia, Georgia, Khazars and Volga Bulgaria that we're reasonably sure about, we've also discussed Wallachia and Golden Horde/Mongols, those are less certain to make it in. It is important to not go too crazy with new civs, they slow down the game a lot and also one of the reasons for making 2.0 is to give the new civs in RFCE++ a less crowded map. Filling the map up until it's crowded again would defeat that purpose.
     
  3. iOnlySignIn

    iOnlySignIn Prince$s

    Joined:
    Nov 4, 2011
    Messages:
    2,134
    Location:
    Virgo Supercluster
    Germany needs to be split in to more different states for the HRE to be truly interesting. Currently, the Emperor is pretty much whomever has best relations with Germany.
     
  4. Nolan08

    Nolan08 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    Messages:
    115
    Location:
    Bend
    I don't think the addition of new civs is that necessary honestly. Like another poster was saying in here, though, if you have HRE, you have to have enough civs in Germany to make it a worthwhile concept, otherwise it's not necessary.

    There's really only a few civs that I wish made the cut in the original RFCE 1.0 version, and the civs are:

    Scotland
    (Possibly Ireland, but also possibly not needed)
    Aragon or Catalonia (could be subsumed into Leon and Castile, but it'd be interesting for historical purposes)
    Civs in Germany to make the HRE concept viable and interesting
    And then, of course, a civ in Morocco to take up the place of the Fall of the Muslims in Spain.

    Other than that, though, I don't see too much need for MORE civs...like you said, they just lag the game up which I already have a problem with. I'd like the K mod implemented to lessen the chance of MAFs. I have never had a MAF happen in a SoI game, so I don't see why it couldn't happen for a RFCE game, as well.

    Honestly, I still think that the stability ratings for the various civs in RFCE are still out of wack, too, especially in RFCE 1.0. Civil wars happen too frequently, and Austria rarely ever makes it after it's spawn. France rarely survives in any of my games, either, and they are supposed to be the powerful civ on the map.

    So basically in order of importance for civs I would put it as:
    Scotland
    Maghreb-like Civ for Islam to make that area interesting and viable
    Aragon/Catalonia
    Civs in Germany
    (Maybe not Ireland, though)
     
  5. zwei833

    zwei833 HRE Mercenary

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,158
    Location:
    Guangzhou, China
    Happy to see this thread ,though I don't know what is brainstorming .
     
  6. zwei833

    zwei833 HRE Mercenary

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,158
    Location:
    Guangzhou, China
    German civs, do you mean the civs such as Bavaria, Saxony ,Swabia, etc?I will be happy to see that (because I am interested in German history ), but I afraid there will be too much civs.

    And if anyone really make this, I suggest make a system to let the flag of the civ which is elected to be the Kaiser turn into the HRE flag.
     
  7. zwei833

    zwei833 HRE Mercenary

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,158
    Location:
    Guangzhou, China
    And if someone need the flags for the civs in german ,I can make them
     
  8. rrosen

    rrosen Chieftain

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2011
    Messages:
    313
    I think one question to ask is: how volatile would you like history to be? In the current version civilizations very closely resemble their historical domains, at the cost of decreased variability between games. Is that a good or a bad thing? Is it desirable for e.g. France/Austria/Ottomans to become super-Empires, exceeding their traditional domains every now and then? (And a follow-up question: if it is indeed desirable, is it technically feasible to not have it happen every game?)
     
  9. Morholt

    Morholt Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    440
    Location:
    Swedish Empire
    Brainstorming means exchanging ideas.

    I'm sceptical towards more German civs for a number of reasons. Firstly gameplay, we don't want a zillion different civs. Also I don't see any principal difference between for example Bavaria and Swabia the way that there is a difference between Spain and Portugal. Also historical reasons, Germany in the middle ages was no less homogeneous than France or Poland. Really the fragmentation that is associated with the HRE did not come until the Reformation and 30 years war.
     
  10. AbsintheRed

    AbsintheRed Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    8,083
    Location:
    Szeged, Hungary
    If the map will be similar to the latest suggestions in the map thread, then we already agreed on including Khazaria, Georgia, Armenia, Volga Bulgaria and also a playable Golden Horde
    Most of the other RFCE++ civs will also make it
    That's already ~40 civs, so splitting Germany to small HRE states would be very hard on gameplay
    I also agree with this:
    So it's not likely at all
    Having said that, some kind of HRE and Union mechanics will be definitely included though
    We would like to have this brainstorming on how (or if) these 2 RFCE++ systems can still be improved
     
  11. zwei833

    zwei833 HRE Mercenary

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,158
    Location:
    Guangzhou, China
    I agree . As I have said ,there too much civs for a "Europe" mod
     
  12. AbsintheRed

    AbsintheRed Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2009
    Messages:
    8,083
    Location:
    Szeged, Hungary
    Thanks for the offer, art is always needed for mods...
    Are you capable of doing other kinds of artwork for Civ IV too?
    We are usually in lack of building art, especially for the new civs
    For example the Lithuanian and Swedish UB still share the same building art IIRC :/
     
  13. Morholt

    Morholt Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    440
    Location:
    Swedish Empire
    I made new icons for them in + +, but they do need new models.
     
  14. Bonci

    Bonci Chieftain

    Joined:
    Oct 22, 2005
    Messages:
    729
    Location:
    Tridentum - Italia
    I love the new civs in rfce++...
    Isn't it possible to split germany in two or three civs and let the other cities be independent? I don't think that 2 civs are so much.
    Maybe with some feature that allows players and AIs to "influence" the independents? Maybe bribe them before the HRE vote?

    And I would love to see a very strong pope! It should also be a problem if you have a low number of faith points...players should feel urged about collecting them. Maybe you could be excommunicated if you have only a few.
    It should obviously be balanced.
     
  15. zwei833

    zwei833 HRE Mercenary

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    1,158
    Location:
    Guangzhou, China
    Do have a "blank" icon .dds file with only a frame? I feel difficult to make icons without a .dds like that
     
  16. Jusos2108

    Jusos2108 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    2,698
    IMO at least Saxony and Bavaria should be present.
     
  17. Morholt

    Morholt Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2006
    Messages:
    440
    Location:
    Swedish Empire
    I've been using these two, and GIMP.
     
  18. Nolan08

    Nolan08 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    Messages:
    115
    Location:
    Bend
    Wellllll....

    Technically, yes. But also no haha. Historically, Germany was much more divided politically than either England or France in the Medieval Ages. But not divided culturally until the Reformation when the northern part of Germany became mostly Protestant and the southern part became mostly Catholic. And that's the 30 years War business you were talking about. But otherwise, you are correct.

    ;)
     
  19. merijn_v1

    merijn_v1 Black Belt

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,226
    Location:
    The city of the original vlaai
    I have. Look at the attachment.

    As many of the RFCE++ (if not all) will be include, some of your wishlist will be in the game. (the red ones will probably be in)


    Maybe the Mongol Horde could be a non-playable civ, like Byzantium in vanilla RFC. (Only more aggressive. Some kind of "Unique Barbarian")
     
  20. variousletters

    variousletters Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2010
    Messages:
    9
    I don't know how easy this would be to implement from a programming perspective, but I've always thought that some faith points should be rewarded for converting another nation to your religion.

    I'm not sure what the exact number of points should be. 10 seems a bit excessive, but 5 seems like a good incentive for players to actually go through the trouble of converting their neighbors.

    (Sorry, I know this is a bit off topic as the thread is largely discussing which Civs and RFC++ features ought to the included --- perhaps I should have posted in a different thread?)
     

Share This Page

Ebates: Get Paid to Shop