A religious victory is something that will be included and accommodated by SovRev, so one day it'll be there if ever you decide you'd like it, by itself, in your expansion.
I would be delighted to accept - thank you!
I think one of the Religious Victory requirements should be the passing of your religion as the World Religion in the World Congress. That won't be the ONLY requirement, obviously, but it'll at least set the stage for the victory process, and will prevent someone from rushing it straight out of the gate with missionary spam.
I'd agree with this. A full list of requirements for Economic/Religious victory is needed before we can do anything, though.
I like what I'm seeing so far, and I don't want to single out only the things I do not like, nor offend the civ-designers, but I find some of the uniques incredibly bland and uninteresting(looking at you Chocolaterie and Raffia Mill).
Unique resources that noone else can have isn't fun or encouraging new playstyles or anything really.
Again, really appreciate the work people are doing here!
Feel free to suggest different stuff then! Suggestions are always welcome. However, unique resources do encourage a trading strategy.
About the Economic VC, I don't know if it's really necessary. The Diplo VC is already a kind of economic rush for CSs.
For the Religious VC, what about wiping out all religions from its Holy Cities? Like a Domination VC.
And, I'd suggest adding Monomotapa Kingdom and Phoenincia as civs. CiV needs more variety, there are many european civs and few of other continents' which made great part of history. If there's no more room for civs, exchange for Belgium (or Italy, or Venice, I really don't like the idea of these civs).
For one more feature, what about More Luxuries and a way to trade Bonus Resources (and put in Rice and Corn), and More Great People (Krazjen).
Edit: Viregel, if you need someone to write some Civilopedia files, count with me! But not with coding. I am for codes what Poland is to space.
For Economic Victory, I'm thinking about making this more valid by making alliances with City States less about just giving them money, and more about actual diplomacy, like helping them out and stuff like that. I also like that requirement for a Religious Victory, and I think that it should definitely be in.
In terms of civs, I had never heard of Monomontapa before today, though I would be interested in making the civ myself at some point. Phoenicia has a problem thematically - given the theme is the First World War, I believe it to be a bad move to add a civ that is several millennia out. I've considered dropping a few civs here, including Israel and Hungary, but I believe the choice is strong enough already. Also, on Italy and Belgium - why don't you like them, just out of interest? The fact that they are modern civs is a large part of the reason they're here, and also because they participated in many of the things touched on here.
More Resources is a thing that would certainly be viable as well.
Also, I would be delighted to accept your offer of Civilopedias! I will get back to you on them as soon as possible.
Colonialism is one of the new mechanics of the expansion, and since Italy and Belgium are the only colonial powers left to do I believe that they are necessary.
Italy a Colonial Power is perhaps stretching it, but yes. They did both colonise to a reasonable extent, thus are worthy of being put in this expansion based on systems and scenarios.