I've been wondering for a while from where these come.
The women I meet mostly are interested in monogamous relationships: they want not only to feel special; to enjoy their time with me (or boyfriend, if they're just platonic friends of mine), but to have the relationship be something of a one-off.
Why is it necessary to have something so 'special' before having sex? Why must someone else make a woman feel special? What happened to self-evaluation?
Is this disgust at polyamory and promiscuity inbuilt or cultural? It's certainly highly prevalent in our culture, but I can't help but think that if there wasn't a tendency towards it more women would rebel.
If you think it's cultural, at what point in education (and how) are people indoctrinated?
I've known women who seem very sensible and independent become very lovey and soppy after/about sex. Why is sex such a sacred notion for people (even people who don't believe any religious doctrine)? What is it that makes people treat it so differently from, for example, a massage?
Why is sex special, and why does it require some reinforcement of 'specialness'? Why do so many people regard it as cheating if you see someone else after having sex (not immediately! Within a few days, let's say)?
Example of the cultural bias towards monogamy:
The women I meet mostly are interested in monogamous relationships: they want not only to feel special; to enjoy their time with me (or boyfriend, if they're just platonic friends of mine), but to have the relationship be something of a one-off.
Why is it necessary to have something so 'special' before having sex? Why must someone else make a woman feel special? What happened to self-evaluation?
Is this disgust at polyamory and promiscuity inbuilt or cultural? It's certainly highly prevalent in our culture, but I can't help but think that if there wasn't a tendency towards it more women would rebel.
If you think it's cultural, at what point in education (and how) are people indoctrinated?
I've known women who seem very sensible and independent become very lovey and soppy after/about sex. Why is sex such a sacred notion for people (even people who don't believe any religious doctrine)? What is it that makes people treat it so differently from, for example, a massage?
Why is sex special, and why does it require some reinforcement of 'specialness'? Why do so many people regard it as cheating if you see someone else after having sex (not immediately! Within a few days, let's say)?
Example of the cultural bias towards monogamy:
Spoiler :
Do you believe that young people are capable of maintaining long-term relationships and capable of moral reasoning?
Everyone who has looked at the issue has found that teens can experience the love that adults experience. The only difference is that they change partners more, because they are warehoused together, told it's puppy love and not real, and are unable to marry without permission. The assumption is they are not capable. But many distinguished couples todayJimmy and Rosalynn Carter, George and Barbara Bushmarried young and have very successful long-term relationships.
According to census data, the divorce rate of males marrying in their teens is lower than that of males marrying in their 20s. Overall the divorce rate of people marrying in their teens is a little higher. Does that mean we should prohibit them from marrying? That's absurd. We should aim to reverse that, telling young people the truth: that they are capable of creating long-term stable relationships. They might failbut adults do every day, too.
The "friends with benefits" phenomenon is a by-product of isolating adolescents, warehousing them together, and delivering messages that they are incapable of long-term relationships. Obviously they have strong sexual urges and act on them in ways that are irresponsible. We can change that by letting them know they are capable of having more than a hookup.
Studies show that we reach the highest levels of moral reasoning while we're still in our teens. Those capabilities parallel higher-order cognitive reasoning abilities, which peak fairly early. Across the board, teens are far more capable than we think they are.
Everyone who has looked at the issue has found that teens can experience the love that adults experience. The only difference is that they change partners more, because they are warehoused together, told it's puppy love and not real, and are unable to marry without permission. The assumption is they are not capable. But many distinguished couples todayJimmy and Rosalynn Carter, George and Barbara Bushmarried young and have very successful long-term relationships.
According to census data, the divorce rate of males marrying in their teens is lower than that of males marrying in their 20s. Overall the divorce rate of people marrying in their teens is a little higher. Does that mean we should prohibit them from marrying? That's absurd. We should aim to reverse that, telling young people the truth: that they are capable of creating long-term stable relationships. They might failbut adults do every day, too.
The "friends with benefits" phenomenon is a by-product of isolating adolescents, warehousing them together, and delivering messages that they are incapable of long-term relationships. Obviously they have strong sexual urges and act on them in ways that are irresponsible. We can change that by letting them know they are capable of having more than a hookup.
Studies show that we reach the highest levels of moral reasoning while we're still in our teens. Those capabilities parallel higher-order cognitive reasoning abilities, which peak fairly early. Across the board, teens are far more capable than we think they are.


