Or is it simply extremely smart politics?
Nope, I doubt it.
Think back to Gore's battle for a recount in Florida. He decides to ask for a recount of
just those counties that were likely to go his way, instead of a thorough recount. Of course he lost in the Supreme Court anyway, but what
if the Court had left the decision to the state courts? Would Gore's cagey politics have won the day? Nope - the Miami Herald (I think it was) did the research and found he would have lost anyway.
But, if he had
done the right thing and asked for a full recount, and the state courts had granted that petition as they did the narrower one, and if the US Supremes had stood aside, Gore would have won.
OK now, fast forward to the present. Hillary, as we all know and hate, is the uber-triangulator. She has done her best to position herself where she thinks the majority of Americans want to go. And the people's reaction? They
see her finger in the wind and don't like it one bit, and now Obama is riding high.
Could Rush's shenanigans backfire on the dittoheads? If enough of them join in to matter at all, I think it very well could.
Moral of the story: when the right thing is really obvious, you might as well do it. Anything else is likely to just be outsmarting yourself.
I heard a news blurb on Fri. regarding the large number of Gop'ers switching registrations to DEM to vote in the Pennyslvania primary. Some pundits felt it was Operation Chaos while others thought it was Obama's mystical charm.
Both wrong, I think. Instead, it's the charm of casting a vote that will actually make a difference, instead of voting in an already-decided primary.