1. We have added the ability to collapse/expand forum categories and widgets on forum home.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Photobucket has changed its policy concerning hotlinking images and now requires an account with a $399.00 annual fee to allow hotlink. More information is available at: this link.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. All Civ avatars are brought back and available for selection in the Avatar Gallery! There are 945 avatars total.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. To make the site more secure, we have installed SSL certificates and enabled HTTPS for both the main site and forums.
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Civ6 is released! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  6. Dismiss Notice
  7. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice

Rush the capital with only 2 units?

Discussion in 'Civ5 - Strategy & Tips' started by SeismoGraf, Sep 14, 2010.

  1. SeismoGraf

    SeismoGraf Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    169
    In the Civilization V Live Gameplay with Greg, Berlin had a defensive strength of 8 at population 1, 2 and 3. I wonder what happens if such a city gets attacked by only 2 units:

    • Warrior + Scout
    • 2x Warrior
    • Spearman + Scout
    • Spearman + Warrior
    • 2x Spearman
    Spearmen can be obtained very early, by getting an upgrade from ruins. If all units are far away, the city will have to rely solely on its defensive strength, seeing how expensive rush-buying was in the build they played (scout 140g, warrior 200g).

    This is one of the first things I want to know, when the game comes out. Ideally have a script that runs through a couple hundred dice rolls and gives the odds, for taking the city at once or on a later turn.

    Do you think any of above 2 units should give the attacker favorable odds? Do you like rushing in SP or MP? What is your opinion about losing the game respectively taking out an enemy, say in the first 30 turns?
     
  2. krunsh

    krunsh Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    Messages:
    303
    It's gonna be hard when you add the city bombard to the math. I don't think 2 unit can do it... You also have to take in consideration that even if the unit are stronger, they will most likely need more than one attack to finish off the city.

    So at least 2 bombard, maybe 3... Plus the city defense.
     
  3. SevenSpirits

    SevenSpirits Immortal?

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2007
    Messages:
    512
    Should be pretty easy to determine once we know the combat mechanics, since combat has such low variance compared to civ iv. My guess is you'd need at least 2 spears though - not super easy.
     
  4. Louis XXIV

    Louis XXIV Le Roi Soleil

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2003
    Messages:
    13,579
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    My guess is two spears, probably three. Keep in mind that one of the spears could be hit twice, which would all but cripple it. I'm sure it's possible, it's just far more difficult than in Civ4 (for obvious reasons).
     
  5. chaotoroboto

    chaotoroboto Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2010
    Messages:
    151
    I know if I start 4 out close to the Zulu o the Aztecs, I'll try to warrior rush the capital.

    I wonder if an archer/spearman combo is where the money is?
     
  6. bjbrains

    bjbrains Man of U-235

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    837
    Since cities have 20hp instead of 10... You're going to need more than two units.
     
  7. krunsh

    krunsh Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2008
    Messages:
    303
    I did not know that!
     
  8. parabellum9x19

    parabellum9x19 Chieftain

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2010
    Messages:
    69
    from TheMystic's preview (VoodooExtreme) it seems 4 units is a bare minimum early game city rush. bare minimum = you are sure to take losses, but not assured the city. you may fail with four. Six units on an undefended 1 or 2 level city is a bit of a better bet (from what i've seen / read / inferred). terrain changes things too...attacking across a river, is the city on a hill, etc...
     
  9. SevenSpirits

    SevenSpirits Immortal?

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2007
    Messages:
    512
    This is useful to know and also great news! Where'd you get the info?
     
  10. SeismoGraf

    SeismoGraf Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2009
    Messages:
    169
    Well, this changes everything. Thanks for the info! So in the very early game you can send out your units without worry of getting rushed. This feels so much better than it was in Civ4 with the undefended capital gamble.
     
  11. bjbrains

    bjbrains Man of U-235

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    837
    You can see it in videos, and I believe it was confirmed in some preview.
     
  12. Scramble

    Scramble Chieftain

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2006
    Messages:
    283
    Location:
    Canada
    Don't forget that in that vid, the city was ungarrisoned. If your enemy spots your rush and garrisons something in the city, it's strength increases.

    I believe that is how garrisoning works... correct me if I am wrong.
     
  13. skepticon

    skepticon Chieftain

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2010
    Messages:
    25
    One strat that might work is to build a barracks (how early can we build them?) and then save that promotion for an insta-heal the turn you want to attack. In other words, get in range, take your bombardment hit, heal up to full and then rush in for victory with full strength units.
     
  14. SevenSpirits

    SevenSpirits Immortal?

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2007
    Messages:
    512
    Barracks needs bronze working. I bet (to rush an empty capital, which seems likely dumb) it would be more quick and effective to just get an extra unit.
     
  15. ainwood

    ainwood Consultant. Administrator

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2001
    Messages:
    30,061
    I wonder how early barbarians appear. They're normally quite good for a promotion or so (presume its capped like Civ4 though)
     
  16. stealth_nsk

    stealth_nsk Chieftain

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2005
    Messages:
    5,020
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Novosibirsk, Russia
    We've seen it on the video. Very early but they don't have enough force to conquer even ungarrisoned city for a long time.
     
  17. CTH

    CTH Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2005
    Messages:
    399
    Location:
    Göteborg, Sweden
    Japan could be the best civ for this, always fight at full strength kind of takes the edge of the city bombing (unless the city totally destroys a unit)
     
  18. SilentMage

    SilentMage On the Von Braun

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    83
    Location:
    Washington, DC, USA
    If I'm not mistaken, I believe that it was stated in the demo video that only the Japanese Samurai can attack at full strength even when damaged. If all Japanese units can attack at full strength when damaged, that would be a really powerful unique ability...
     
  19. SevenSpirits

    SevenSpirits Immortal?

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2007
    Messages:
    512
    At the start of the game, city bombard does like 2-3 damage to warriors. Definitely no total destruction.
     
  20. Twahn

    Twahn Chieftain

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2007
    Messages:
    83
    Location:
    Australia
    I'm afraid you are mistaken. This ability is not tied to Samurai, but is Japan's unique ability and applies to all their units.
     

Share This Page