[RD] Russia Invades Ukraine: Eight


Dnipropetrovsk is outside the regions Russia has officially claimed (eg in its Douma vote) as already part of Russia. This plays a role, as any land conquered there is (at any rate) more likely to be used as bargaining chip etc.

1749411307764.png


As the video states, Ukraine claims that Russia hasn't yet entered Dnipropetrovsk region, but also that Russia is at points only 2KM away from it. So perhaps this is pretty much one and the same; both imply an imminent push there.

Russia is also a couple of KM outside Sumy, a city in yet another province outside the massive southern front:

1749411278344.png
 
Last edited:
Ukrainian journalist published statistics about desertion rates in 2025.


90.5 thousands criminal cases opened since the beginning of 2025. 20 thousands of them in May.
That's just official numbers.
 
So a SU-35 gets wasted by an, apparently, older F-16 and your handler:scan: tells you to divert attention to AFU desertion rates!?:confused:
Me thinks that's not a very intelligent way of parroting supremacy of russian invaders propaganda! :nono:
But what do I know? It's, definitely, not my area of expertise.:crazyeye:
 

Russia could send "little green men" to test NATO's resolve, German intelligence boss warns​


BERLIN, June 9 (Reuters) - Russia is determined to test the resolve of the NATO alliance, including by extending its confrontation with the West beyond the borders of Ukraine, the Germany's foreign intelligence chief told the Table Media news organization.

Bruno Kahl, head of the Federal Intelligence Service, said his agency had clear intelligence indications that Russian officials believed the collective defence obligations enshrined in the NATO treaty no longer had practical force.

"We are quite certain, and we have intelligence showing it, that Ukraine is only a step on the journey westward," Kahl told Table Media in a podcast interview.
"That doesn't mean we expect tank armies to roll westwards," he added. "But we see that NATO's collective defence promise is to be tested."

.....

Without detailing the nature of his intelligence sources, Kahl said Russian officials were envisaging confrontations that fell short of a full military engagement that would test whether the U.S. would really live up to its mutual aid obligations under Article 5 of the North Atlantic Treaty.
"They don't need to dispatch armies of tanks for that," he said. "It's enough to send little green men to Estonia to protect supposedly oppressed Russian minorities."

.....

 
That is well known yes, we expected them to invade the Baltics or Moldavia, before the Trump presidency is over too, since a backlash is expected there too.

Only reason it has not happened so far is the fact Ukraine stopped their invasion cold.

It is as if the Germans got stuck in the Ardennes in 1940, either they advance from there or they go home.
 
Last edited:
You should likely translate some of that, most people here don’t read German I imagine…
"Dieses 'Manifest' ist kein spannender Debattenbeitrag, sondern eine weinerliche Melange aus Rechthaberei, Geschichtsklitterung und intellektueller Wohlstandsverwahrlosung."
“This “manifest” is not an exciting contribution to the debate but a whiny mix of pedantry, altered history and intellectual insanity.”
 
Last edited:
Ukraine: Russian advance in Dniepropetrovsk region is "slow and insignificant".

Exchange of bodies has begun, Russia has transferred 1212 bodies of Ukrainian soldiers, got 27 in return.

Only 4 US-supplied Abrams tanks remain operational.
 
Why is your handler focusing propaganda on the numbers of Abrams still in operation by Ukraine!?
Was the hit to the strategic bombers fleet that severe? :confused:
Should I pull an article talking about how Russia is running out of tanks from the 60's to pull into the front?
Maybe an article about the decrease of weapons exports from Russia asking where is the T14 armata?
Or maybe an article asking where is the black fleet?
I can't decide:undecide:
 
Last edited:
Ukraine: Russian advance in Dniepropetrovsk region is "slow and insignificant".

Exchange of bodies has begun, Russia has transferred 1212 bodies of Ukrainian soldiers, got 27 in return.

Only 4 US-supplied Abrams tanks remain operational.
I'm kinda surprised any number of Abrams tanks remain operational in Ukraine?

It was always a maintenance nightmare to just keep running. The Americans were saying for a long time before sending it, that it wasn't the right piece of kit under the circumstances. They only sent 31 anyway, partly to get the Germans off the fence, which might be the greater significance of these tanks, whether they work or not.

But it's the US, and anything to do with the US, well...
 
I'm kinda surprised any number of Abrams tanks remain operational in Ukraine?

It was always a maintenance nightmare to just keep running. The Americans were saying for a long time before sending it, that it wasn't the right piece of kit under the circumstances. They only sent 31 anyway, partly to get the Germans off the fence, which might be the greater significance of these tanks, whether they work or not.

But it's the US, and anything to do with the US, well...
Maintenance issues were apparently resolved to some degree, as most of them were used on the battlefield. The remaining 4 are not necessarily operational either, they might be cannibalized or destroyed in airstrike with no confirmation. But if they are not proven to be destroyed or captured, it's better to consider them operational.
 
I'm kinda surprised any number of Abrams tanks remain operational in Ukraine?

It was always a maintenance nightmare to just keep running. The Americans were saying for a long time before sending it, that it wasn't the right piece of kit under the circumstances. They only sent 31 anyway, partly to get the Germans off the fence, which might be the greater significance of these tanks, whether they work or not.

But it's the US, and anything to do with the US, well...
Since the backbone of US vehicles given to the AFU are Strikers and Bradleys, it makes even less sense for propaganda effort to parrot pieces on underused Abrams tanks! Specially since a Bradley is able to kill Russian tanks!
 

Pretty funny. Russian Su-25 shot down another Russian Su-25 with unguided attack rockets. They even placed a camera in the launching point to film the launch but filmed something much more interesting.
 

Zelenskyy: US diverting 20,000 missiles promised for Ukraine to the Middle East​

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy told ABC News' Martha Raddatz that his defense minister told him Friday the U.S. was sending anti-drone weapons promised to Ukraine to the Middle East instead.

Zelenskyy said the U.S. would divert "20,000 missiles" earmarked for Ukraine in an agreement with the Biden administration to the Middle East, where it appears the U.S. would use them for its own force protection


Well, now we know what those missiles were needed for. Something of higher priority than Ukraine.
 
Wel it is clear nothing is to be expected from Trump, every indication is that the US Americans have elected a Russian agent as president.
"This was a big mistake," Mr Trump said, adding he believed Russia would not have invaded Ukraine in 2022 had Russian president Vladimir Putin not been ejected from the high-profile group of nations. "Putin speaks to me. He doesn't speak to anybody else ... he's not a happy person about it,” Mr Trump said.
 
Last edited:
"Putin speaks to me", yep we know. Issuing orders.
 

Kim Jong Un is sending another 6,000 people to Kursk, after an estimated 6,000 of his troops were killed or wounded there​

  • Russia says Kim Jong Un is sending another 6,000 people to Kursk.
  • UK intelligence estimates 6,000 North Koreans have already been killed or wounded in Kursk.
  • Sergei Shoigu said Kim is now sending 1,000 sappers and 5,000 workers to rebuild the oblast.

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un is set to send another 6,000 of his people to aid Russia in the Kursk region.

Russian state media on Tuesday cited Sergei Shoigu, the secretary of Moscow's security council, saying that Pyongyang had agreed to provide 1,000 sappers — combat engineers who deal with explosives and fortifications — and 5,000 construction workers to rebuild the oblast.

Shoigu gave no timeline on the deployment. He said the sappers would help to demine Kursk, where Ukrainian troops held pockets of territory for about eight months after a surprise incursion in the summer of 2024.

The North Korean workers, meanwhile, would "restore infrastructure facilities destroyed by the occupiers," Shoigu told state media.

Shoigu's announcement comes after he visited North Korea for the second time in two weeks. According to Russian state media, he's visited Pyongyang three times in the last three months.

The new arrangement underscores a deepening relationship between Russia and North Korea that's opened up a vital source of arms and troops for the Kremlin to maintain its offensive pace against Ukraine.

Pyongyang, meanwhile, has benefited from economic support, cash payouts, and military tech expertise from Russia. In November, Ukrainian officials had estimated that North Korea would receive up to $2,000 from Russia for each soldier it deployed to fight Ukraine.

"Sending North Koreans to support Russia is a quick and reliable way for Kim Jong Un to make money," Soo Kim, a North Korea researcher and former CIA analyst, told Business Insider about Tuesday's announcement.

"So in the short run, Kim gets money in exchange for providing manpower to Russia," she added. "Long run, the access to critical military know-how will only strengthen his threat base."

North Korean state media wrote on Tuesday that Kim had met with Shoigu. While it did not report on any details of fresh troops being sent to Kursk, it wrote that Kim had "confirmed the contents" and "accepted the relevant plans" of North Korea's cooperation.

Kim initially sent some 12,000 troops in the fall of 2024 to Kursk, the oblast where Ukraine entered in August of that year and seized up to 500 square miles of Russian soil.

Aided by Pyongyang's soldiers, the Kremlin's forces recaptured almost all of those gains by March 2025, effectively ousting Ukrainian forces from the region by late spring.

In the process, Pyongyang reportedly suffered heavy casualties. Ukraine said in early 2025 that about 3,800 to 4,000 North Korean soldiers had been killed or wounded.

On June 15, the UK Defense Ministry said in an intelligence update that it estimated that more than 6,000 North Korean troops had been killed or wounded in Kursk.

Shoigu, who oversaw the first two years of Russia's war in Ukraine as defense minister, said Moscow and Pyongyang are planning memorials for the North Korean troops lost.

"The heads of our states have decided to perpetuate the feat of the soldiers of the Korean People's Army who took part in the military operations," he told state media, referring to North Korea's military.

The top Russian official didn't say if Kim's new tranche of personnel to Kursk would come from North Korea's military. Pyongyang has typically been known to use its massive army to build large infrastructure projects.

In response to the announcement, South Korea's foreign ministry said in a statement that it was "closely monitoring developments" between North Korea and Russia.
 
Back
Top Bottom