^^^ VPN services are not (fully) blocked in China.
While flanking Russian units to their left and right, Ukrainians drove straight in front of the Spetsnaz brigade, and then got hit by a murderous combination of artillery and ATGMs, and then by the VKS. Here’s one of related videos (at least YP-765s don’t blow up to pieces when hit, like ‘better than Bradley’-BMP-3s), and here a link to account by one of troops of the 22nd, who’s claiming he’s knocked out five tanks with his ATGM. Essentially, videos and this account are mutually confirming, and I have little doubts that the involved ZSU troops came away with a very unpleasant experience (and opinions about their superiors, too).
Guess, we need not expecting reports about this ‘super-turbo tank battle’ and ‘Ukrainian success’ by the CNN, Daily Mail, The New York Times, Forbes, or any other, similar, instances…
Ah yes, and a ‘note’ for all those ‘certain’ Leopards 2, M1s, A-10s and F-16s would’ve performed differently: NO, they would not. Because ‘even’, say, 24 F-16s, and 30 A-10s, and 200 M1s and Leopards would still lack the necessary artillery support. F-16s and A-10s because they can’t deliver the same amount of high explosives like artillery can.
Ditto with Poland, Latvia or most states that actually endured being subject to USSR, which have put a LOT of means compared to their size. They seem VERY intent to make Russia lose the war. Guess first-hand experience of living under its yoke does that to most people.I'm impressed with Slovakia lately, Slovakian jets are defending Kharkiv and soon they'll be making quite a lot of artillery shells for a country of their size; even as-is they're already outpacing France. Also props to North Macedonia on supplying Ukraine with Ukrainian helicopters, and Bulgaria for their 2022 scheme to supply diesel refined from Russian oil at a Lukoil plant to Ukraine, as well as to supply significant (and continuing) amounts of Soviet-compatible ammunition.
That and being high up on the list of Russia's list of next targets.Guess first-hand experience of living under its yoke does that to most people.
And thus it is even more surreal that Hungary is sucking on Putin's.Ditto with Poland, Latvia or most states that actually endured being subject to USSR, which have put a LOT of means compared to their size. They seem VERY intent to make Russia lose the war. Guess first-hand experience of living under its yoke does that to most people.
And thus it is even more surreal that Hungary is sucking on Putin's.
It was just in the local news that the extra gas Hungary bought during autumn (when gas prices were sky high 200-300 EUR) by making a private deal with Russia for additional supplies on top of the long-term gas contract, circumventing the EU and other allies, has currently accrued an unrealized loss of -2bn EUR (as gas prices dropped to 40). Even worse, part of the gas purchase is financed by the Russians. So Hungary has to pay a huge sum with interest to Russia over the next period. Hungarian politicians were effectively betting against the West and now they pay the price. I guess they wanted to flip the fingers to a gasless EU during the winter period. They ate up Kremlin propaganda.
Fortunately Russia can only attract nations and people of failure to its orbit whose actions barely matter.
(Source in Hungarian: https://www.portfolio.hu/gazdasag/2...ontott-most-a-gazkeszlet-megtartasarol-606266 )
Another amusing fact about this : Hungary put on the "unfriendly countries" list of the Kremlin.And thus it is even more surreal that Hungary is sucking on Putin's.
Translation they have fixed price contracts but the market price has now fallen lower than the Russian price?
Putin has made Russia the enemy of Europe. Wealth distribution in that graph is just an indirect function of that.Can't resize this image :<
![]()
Graphics like that are as useless as it gets. You cannot project the political leaning of a nation's government onto the entire population of the nation. That's not how any of this works. Portraying it as such just paints a wrong picture, even when you include the line about what it is supposed to mean.Can't resize this image :<
![]()
Analysis of Ukrainian attempted offensive near Orekhov couple of weeks ago.
Ah yes, and a ‘note’ for all those ‘certain’ Leopards 2, M1s, A-10s and F-16s would’ve performed differently: NO, they would not. Because ‘even’, say, 24 F-16s, and 30 A-10s, and 200 M1s and Leopards would still lack the necessary artillery support. F-16s and A-10s because they can’t deliver the same amount of high explosives like artillery can.