I don't know how those guys explain it, but it shouldn't be too hard. 3:1 numerical superiority (or 5:1, depending on your source).How do those guys explain the two previous successful Ukrainian offensives ?
I don't know how those guys explain it, but it shouldn't be too hard. 3:1 numerical superiority (or 5:1, depending on your source).How do those guys explain the two previous successful Ukrainian offensives ?
Like other Central/Eastern European countries used to have, Hungary's main source of Russian gas is through the long-term gas contract between the two countries. These are 10-15 year contracts which regulate gas flows between Russia and Hungary. The pricing is usually some kind of TTF (Dutch gas exchange) pricing with a few months delay. So kinda competitive. If we are lucky we can even get some discount here and there compared to TTF.
Now in September the Hungarian govt decided that they want to source more gas on top of the long-term gas contract. They decided to buy a lot from Russia for basically around the spot price. You can see below that the TTF price in September was around 200 EUR.
View attachment 658450
To make this deal the Hungarian govt had to sweeten up to the Russians, even when everyone else in Europe tried to distance themselves.
Szijjártó (Minister of Foreign Affairs) met with Lavrov despite the EU's explicit request not to
"The meeting between the Russian and Hungarian foreign ministers in New York took place hours after European Commission foreign affairs spokesman Peter Stano stated a press conference that it would be inappropriate to hold bilateral talks with members of the Russian government during the UN General Assembly. According to Stano, this position was understood and accepted by all member states."![]()
Szijjártó met with Lavrov despite the EU's explicit request not to
The EU's request to not hold bilateral talks with Russia during the UNGA this week was understood and accepted by all member states – except Hungary.telex.hu
Now buying such amount of additional gas at the worst prices indicate that the Hungarian govt didn't believe that the EU would be able to properly solve its gas crisis for the winter and wanted to generate political leverage against the West with the help of Russia. The gas storage facilities also had an okay amount of gas in them at this point, so it was not a critical deal to make.
By now gas price has fallen to around 40-50 and due to lowered consumption, more LNG supplies and a mild winter Hungarian gas storage is still in a pretty good shape and this extra gas has not been used. So effectively this amount was bought for 200 EUR or even higher and compared to the current prices Hungary paid an extra 2bn EUR for them (which is a lot of money for such a small state).
Called it. Majority of the world supports Russia because they're authoritarian and conservative.Can't resize this image :<
![]()
Nah, the people's opinion is probably not too different, from what I've seen.Graphics like that are as useless as it gets. You cannot project the political leaning of a nation's government onto the entire population of the nation. That's not how any of this works. Portraying it as such just paints a wrong picture, even when you include the line about what it is supposed to mean.
There are also some oddities in there. Kazakhstan, for example, is listed as Russian leaning on this matter. It is in fact anything but. For a nation that is actually politically linked to Russia, it has been very critical of Russia's behaviour and enacted quite a few decisions that undermine Russian interests. That's not "leaning towards Russia". Considering their situation, they are obviously not standing against Russia, but they are also not in favour of Russia's actions.
1/3 is a majority?
It doesn't show that though. If we're going by the graph then just 3.9% of the world supports Russia! If we add in Russian leaning it is still only 31.5% less then a third.Called it. Majority of the world supports Russia because they're authoritarian and conservative.
Nah, the people's opinion would more likely be "who?"Called it. Majority of the world supports Russia because they're authoritarian and conservative.
Nah, the people's opinion is probably not too different, from what I've seen.
The only response i can think of is in Gif form."Russian leader Vladimir Putin on Thursday formally authorized Moscow’s annual spring conscription campaign, which calls for adding 147,000 troops between April 1 and July 15"
The guys who were sent to invade Arachnids home planet, underestimated their defenses but prevailed in the end?The only response i can think of is in Gif form.
![]()
Russia's economy will collapse by June. It will also run out of cruise missiles, by April. This time for real.
I don't remember A-10 being discussed by any serious sources, but whatever... How do those guys explain the two previous successful Ukrainian offensives ?
Yep, Soviet plan was to launch many thousand tanks over Germany overwhelming quality with quantity trying to reach the Atlantic coast quickly enough, before USA could come to help. I think we can say now how well that had worked in hindsight.Normally Russian footage filters through into the western social media after a while, rather then is reported at face value given how much of it is made up garbage (save the viral videos)
Theres is some truth though as the role of artillery has been dominate in the current war, but NATO weapons were all about quality since they knew they wouldnt be able to match Soviets quantity
The aircombat technology gap will close with F16s, since Russians currently do enjoy an advantage with there more advanced missiles. The A10 has no business in Ukraine, unless Russian really start to scrape the barrel for equipment