warpus
Sommerswerd asked me to change this
But don't you agree that using a nuke would be generally "a bad idea" ?
But don't you agree that using a nuke would be generally "a bad idea" ?
But don't you agree that using a nuke would be generally "a bad idea" ?
I think they developed it in the soon-to-be war against Georgia. (In Central Asia, not the US.)

Yeah, we are making this forum famous, because of this.![]()

Under normal circumstances, sure. But when you need a nuke, you need a nuke, and nothing else will do.Anything is a viable alternative to nuclear weapons, wouldn't you say?![]()
Provolution is owned.Ahhh...no...you see, you fail to understand that if this thread is the number one google hit for your story....it doesnt really help out your arguement.
![]()
![]()
![]()

Under normal circumstances, sure. But when you need a nuke, you need a nuke, and nothing else will do.
Provolution is owned.
Which is why I know these things.Oh, I'm sure you do. I certainly believe you. Stranger things happen all the time - and who really needs "evidence" when trying to convince others of strange happenings?Yes, I am ownedWhich is why I know these things.
Isn't my say-so proof enough?
At least the nanotech suckered you into this thread, and you may as well learn something.These weapons aren't even designed to compete with you guys.. they're not building them to fight the U.S.
If anyone, they will be used against Muslim fundamentalists, which should make you happyright?

We will seeAt least the nanotech suckered you into this thread, and you may as well learn something.
Have you even took a nanotech course?
All I've learned so far is that you're a terribly arrogant person who can't back up his statements with actual evidence.We will seeAt least the nanotech suckered you into this thread, and you may as well learn something.
All I've learned so far is that you're a terribly arrogant person who can't back up his statements with actual evidence.
