Russian and US satellites collide

Winner

Diverse in Unity
Joined
Sep 24, 2004
Messages
27,947
Location
Brno -> Czech rep. >>European Union
From BBC (I'll have to find a better source, since BBC is getting more crappy with each passing day):

US and Russian communications satellites have collided in space in the first such reported mishap.

A satellite owned by the US company Iridium hit a defunct Russian satellite at high speed nearly 780km (485 miles) over Siberia on Tuesday, Nasa said.

The risk to the International Space Station and a shuttle launch planned for later this month is said to be low.

The impact produced a massive cloud of debris, and the magnitude of the crash is not expected to be clear for weeks.

The reportedly non-operational Russian satellite, weighing 950kg (2,094lb), had been launched in 1993, while the Iridium satellite weighed 560 kg and was launched in 1997.

When two such objects collide with such force, the ensuing debris can destroy other satellites, says the BBC's Andy Gallacher in Florida.

But Nasa said the risk to the ISS and its three astronauts was low as the station orbits the earth some 435km below the course of the collision.

It is hoped that most of the wreckage from the collision will burn up in the earth's atmosphere, our correspondent says.

Hundreds of pieces of wreckage are now being tracked, reports say, adding to the tens of thousands of objects that are routinely tracked through space.

Some 6,000 satellites have been sent into orbit since 1957.


-> This is exactly what we need - more trash on the orbit. I wonder how long will it take before we render the LEO unusable.

Anyway, is there any way how to clean the orbit of such small debris? I mean, theoretically. Couldn't we just build some big chung of some plastic foam and use it to "sweep" the orbit? Small particles would collide with it and evaporate or get stuck in it. Just my idea :D
 
I remember a discovery documentary about one site where they use a laser to destroy some of the larger bits of debris. I cant remember if it was operational or if it was still in development, but people are definitely trying.
 
I remember a discovery documentary about one site where they use a laser to destroy some of the larger bits of debris. I cant remember if it was operational or if it was still in development, but people are definitely trying.

Well, the smaller are the ones to be concerned about. A collision with a small particle can kill an astronaut on EVA, a bit larger particle can destroy a spaceship if it hits the right spot.

Let's not even think about what a hammer would do to the ISS (my greetings to the professional female astronaut who lost the toolbox).

I don't think we could use lasers to evaporate the millions of particles in LEO.
 
I thought this was about a border skirmish between Ukraine and Belarus.
Rim shot.

Anyway, this is somewhat strange. What does "defunct" here mean in the definition of the Russian satellite? Was it out of fuel or not?
 
Interesting

http://www.cdi.org/program/document.cfm?DocumentID=3106

Some Basic Facts about Space Debris

The U.S. Air Force currently tracks about 13,400 objects in space, of which only between 6 and 7 percent are active satellites. The rest is debris.

Not all space debris can be located and tracked with current capabilities. The Air Force’s Space Surveillance Network – the best in the world – can see objects down to 10 centimeters (the size of a baseball) in diameter in LEO, where the Space Shuttle, the International Space Station (ISS), most Earth imaging satellites, and satellites providing mobile communications reside); and down to about 1 meter in diameter in Geosynchronous Orbit (GEO, where most of the world’s communications and broadcast satellites reside).

There are more than 100,000 pieces of smaller, untrackable debris, down to the size of a marble (1 centimeter in diameter) in orbit; and possibly trillions of pieces smaller yet. Scientists estimate that there is about 4 million pounds of space junk in LEO alone.

Even tiny pieces of debris can damage or destroy satellites, the Space Shuttle, the ISS, or penetrate astronaut suits. Debris in LEO travel at 10 times the speed of a rifle bullet; a marble-sized bit of junk would slam into a satellite with the energy equal to a 1-ton safe hitting the ground if dropped from a five-story building. Indeed, a tiny paint fleck put a pit in the window of the Challenger Space Shuttle during Sally Ride’s historic first mission.

The amount of space junk is increasing by about 5 percent per year; meaning that by the end of the century a satellite in GEO will have a 40 percent chance of being struck during its operational life-time.

NASA has found that of the 20 problems most likely to cause the loss of a Space Shuttle, 11 involve debris.

NASA data shows a current risk of a “catastrophic” debris strike to the Shuttle of 1 in 200. By comparison, the lifetime risk of a U.S. citizen dying in a car accident is about 1 in 100; the risk of dying in an attack with a firearm, about 1 in 325; the risk of dying in a fire, about 1 in 1,116.

While debris in LEO eventually de-orbits and most burns up in the Earth’s atmosphere (unfortunately, sometimes very large pieces of debris actually hit the Earth intact), debris in GEO remains on orbit, and thus a threat to spacecraft there, forever.

The 1985 test of an ASAT missile fired from a U.S. F-15 fighter at a U.S. Air Force satellite named Solwind resulted in more than 250 pieces of space debris that took 17 years to clear out of LEO. One piece of that debris came within a mile of the ISS.

Most space-faring nations have incorporated into national legislation and regulations requirements for space operators designed to limit debris creation. NASA and the Federal Communications Commission have been leaders in this arena, with the United States currently setting the highest bar in the battle against space junk. Indeed, as noted above, the U.N. Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space is now working on development of an international code of conduct in hopes of slowing the creation of space debris
 
I remember a discovery documentary about one site where they use a laser to destroy some of the larger bits of debris. I cant remember if it was operational or if it was still in development, but people are definitely trying.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_broom


The laser broom is intended to be used at high enough power to punch through the atmosphere with enough remaining power to ablate material from the debris for several minutes. This would provide thrust to alter its orbit, dropping the perigee into the upper atmosphere, increasing drag so that the debris would eventually burn up on reentry.
 
Well, if you would drive on the right side of space this would never have happened.
 
Reminds me of sci-fi stories of space travel rendered very deadly by satellite debris.
 
We'll need to develop a laser that can vaporize all the debris. I can't think of any other foreseeable tech that could do the job.
 
This is concering, as even a speck of paint travelling at high velocity though space has the destructive force of a hand-grenade.
 
I'm wondering why noone is working to address this problem.
 
This is concering, as even a speck of paint travelling at high velocity though space has the destructive force of a hand-grenade.



That's a paint chip meeting the window of a shuttle.
 
I'm wondering why noone is working to address this problem.
No illegal alien astronauts to clean it up?:lol:

It costs a small fortune to boost anything into orbit. If you added in the cost to completely remove the object and all its associated debris once it had outlived its usefulness, the cost would be so prohibitive that hardly anything would be up there. But the good news is that the system is effectively self-cleanining for debris in low orbits. Eventually, the debris sufficiently slows and reenters the atmosphere where most of it burns up before contacting the ground. The problem is a lot more dire for geosynchronous orbits over populated areas.

 
Top Bottom