San Francisco zoo to zap people who get too close to tiger cage

Sims2789

Fool me once...
Joined
Oct 26, 2002
Messages
7,874
Location
California
I've lived in the area my whole life and that zoo has a reputation for shoddy, unsafe facilities (though nothing happened recently until now), so I was suspicious when the media said the attack occurred after he taunted the tiger. Plus, even if he taunted it, it shouldn't have gotten out unless the cage was too short.

I was right. Turns out the fence, when the lazy media actually bothered to measure it (after a few days of speculating about how it could have jumped a 20 foot fence), was really 12 feet (a little under 4 m) high, not 20 (~6.5 m), and there was no ramp allowing the tiger to just waltz out of its cage.

Still, the zoo is installing an electric fence to zap visitors who get too close to the tiger, seemingly still rejecting the idea that the attack occurred because they didn't properly maintain their facilities.

The fact is, regardless of whether he taunted the tiger, having a 12 foot high fence is negligence. Their gorilla cages are rather unsafe too, and rather small. Wonder what'll happen when some little kid sticks his tongue out at one of their starving gorillas? Will the ape have gone mad from being crammed into a tiny cage for its entire life, and rip the kid's tongue out?

Maybe if they'd spent a penny to take better care of their animals and made their zoo safer for humans then they wouldn't have to pay millions to the people they hurt when they need money to pay for their medical bills.
 
Any legislation, precaution, prank, abuse of authority, or good-old individual iniative to shock members of the general public has my endorsement. I think they should crank up the juice and make it possible to suddenly "jump" the fence towards visitors (just to keep them on their toes). Even with agressive policy, we could never shock enough common sense into people.

Seriously though, I wouldn't like to visit a zoo with cages or less animal space than Miami Metro Zoo.
 
Well, they would need to improve the facilities, but I'm not opposed to giving a shock to the people that think teeing off a tiger is cool.
 
Why not just make the enclosure safer and up to code?
 
***MEMORANDUM***

TO: Sims2789
FROM: Everyone on OT
SUBJECT: These stupid threads

Please stop making 200 freaking threads a day about whatever pops into that little mind of yours. Nobody cares about your views on how x is wrong or y is corrupt or z is an infringement of our civil liberties, nor do we care about every single piece of news that has anything to do with Hillary or Obama. We thank you for your immediate cooperation.
 
Why not just make the enclosure safer and up to code?

This one goes to 11.

I envision families attempting to push each other into the fence.
 
...I think I'll take the revolutionary position that people shouldn't be such idiots. Why on Earth do you taunt a grown tiger?
 
This one goes to 11.

I envision families attempting to push each other into the fence.

Hmmmmmm........ Maybe electric fences aren't so bad. I deffinately know my friends would push each other on it. Or see who can hold on longer.
 
Why not just make the enclosure safer and up to code?

Doing that would be taking responsibility for it and they want to blame the kid.

I bet they are raising their fence too, though. Not raising it would be stupid and expensive when it happens again and they get sued.
 
You could slip money between the links and watch people get zapped when they try to grab it.

This fence will be such an attraction, they will have to move the Tiger to make room for more fence.
 
...I think I'll take the revolutionary position that people shouldn't be such idiots. Why on Earth do you taunt a grown tiger?

Oh, about that, he didn't taunt it.
 
Oh, the person who was mauled tried to claim he wasn't an idiot? That sure closes that case.
 
There was at least one witness who came forward (no, she didn't work for the zoo) who said she saw 3 of 4 boys (the 4th has never been identified, likely a passerby) taunting the tiger. Why would some woman with no affiliation with the zoo lie? She said the boy who was killed was not taunting and had an apologetic look and demeanor about him.
 
Oh, the person who was mauled tried to claim he wasn't an idiot? That sure closes that case.

He was claiming his buddy wasn't. I agree it's weak, but since the media also said drug use caused the tiger to attack, that the fence was 20 feet high, and that the boys themselves could be charged with manslaughter I think we shouldn't give the media the presumption of truth.
 
Back
Top Bottom