PantheraTigris2
Deity
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2003
- Messages
- 2,006
He didn't say there were 2 Panther tanks.
"He sees... Tiger tanks... two of them....
PANZER tanks... two of them...."
Panzer, not Panther. If you don't believe me, turn on closed captioning, or read the script - it's online I'm sure.
And the Tigers most certainly used their machine guns, several times.
As for the rest of your comments about realism, like about the tracks - that wasn't even a Tiger tank, it was a T-34/85 mocked up to be a PzVI ausf E, so instead of complaining about the width of the tracks, why not just go for the fact that the driving wheels are in the rear, instead of the front, like they should be in a Tiger? What's the point? - It wasn't a Tiger. It was just meant to look like one, since there were no functioning, running PzVI ausf E's available anywhere in the world at the time the movie was being made.
Both of those "Marders" were totally fictional, btw. But the average person isn't going to notice/care.
And don't tell my grandfather the P-51 can't carry bombs.
"He sees... Tiger tanks... two of them....
PANZER tanks... two of them...."
Panzer, not Panther. If you don't believe me, turn on closed captioning, or read the script - it's online I'm sure.
And the Tigers most certainly used their machine guns, several times.
As for the rest of your comments about realism, like about the tracks - that wasn't even a Tiger tank, it was a T-34/85 mocked up to be a PzVI ausf E, so instead of complaining about the width of the tracks, why not just go for the fact that the driving wheels are in the rear, instead of the front, like they should be in a Tiger? What's the point? - It wasn't a Tiger. It was just meant to look like one, since there were no functioning, running PzVI ausf E's available anywhere in the world at the time the movie was being made.
Both of those "Marders" were totally fictional, btw. But the average person isn't going to notice/care.
And don't tell my grandfather the P-51 can't carry bombs.