1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

Science questions not worth a thread I: I'm a moron!

Discussion in 'Science & Technology' started by The Imp, May 4, 2010.

  1. The Imp

    The Imp Kinslayer

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,573
    Location:
    Pentos
    Post your science questions not worth a thread here.


    I'll start it off, why doesn't light travel faster or slower then 299 792 458 m/s ?
     
  2. ParadigmShifter

    ParadigmShifter Random Nonsense Generator

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2007
    Messages:
    21,810
    Location:
    Liverpool, home of Everton FC
    It does travel slower. That's the speed of light in a vacuum.
     
  3. Gigaz

    Gigaz civoholic

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2007
    Messages:
    1,229
    Location:
    Dresden
    What Paradigm says +
    -Maxwells equations demand 299 792 458 m/s propagation speed for electromagnetic waves in a vacuum
    -the invariant mass of a photon is zero
     
  4. ParadigmShifter

    ParadigmShifter Random Nonsense Generator

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2007
    Messages:
    21,810
    Location:
    Liverpool, home of Everton FC
    How much energy does a photon have?

    If it has no mass does it mean by e = mc^2 it has no energy?
     
  5. Souron

    Souron The Dark Lord

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2003
    Messages:
    5,947
    Location:
    (GMT-5)
  6. bigdog5994

    bigdog5994 Lady Day

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2006
    Messages:
    3,959
    Location:
    Huntsville, Alabama
    :):):):)ing magnets, how do they work?
     
  7. The Imp

    The Imp Kinslayer

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,573
    Location:
    Pentos
    Well, I meant can it travel slower in a vacuum unobstructed or faster?
     
  8. Souron

    Souron The Dark Lord

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2003
    Messages:
    5,947
    Location:
    (GMT-5)
    The constant nature of speed of light is an observed fact established by the [wiki]Michelson–Morley experiment[/wiki].

    Einstein's theories take that fact as a premise.
     
  9. uppi

    uppi Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    3,955
    E=h*f

    h is the Planck's constant and f is the frequency.


    That formula is only half of the story. The full formula is:

    E^2 = m^2c^4 + p^2c^2

    There are two extreme cases. The first is a resting particle. In that case the particle has no momentum (p=0) and thus the formula reduces to E=mc^2. For any particle with a mass greater than zero (and which is not accelerated) it is possible to find the resting frame in which E=mc^2 is valid.

    However as photons have no mass, there is no resting frame and and E=mc^2 is not valid. This is the second extreme case of the above formula when a particle has no mass and thus: E=p*c.

    with p=h/(2 Pi) * k; k=(2 Pi) / lambda; lambda = c/f you get to E=h*f
     
  10. uppi

    uppi Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    3,955
    Short answer: Electrons have spins, which have a magnetic moment. Usually either the electrons occur in pairs and have opposing spin and cancel each other out, or the spin points in a random direction and the average over many spins results in a magnetic moment close to zero.

    But under certain conditions, the spins can align to each other, so that together they have one big magnetic moment. A magnetic moment creates a magnetic field which attracts (or repels, depending on orientation) other magnetic moments.

    The long answer would involve a lot of complicated quantum mechanics.
     
  11. peter grimes

    peter grimes ... Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    13,177
    Location:
    Queens, New York
    So, Uppi, does that mean that protons have no magnetic moment, but positrons (the anti-particle mate of electrons) do?

    Or do all charged particles (protons & anti-protons, positrons & electrons) have magnetic moments?

    And does that mean that neutrons don't have spin?? Or do neutrons have spin, but no magnetic moment?

    I'm sure it's easily wiki-able, but I prefer this format :p
     
  12. uppi

    uppi Chieftain

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2007
    Messages:
    3,955
    Protons also have a magnetic moment, but they usually don't play a role in ferromagnetism, because the short-range exchange interaction mainly affects electrons, which are far more delocalized than the nucleus.

    All charged particles with spin have a magnetic moment.

    Neutrons do have spin, and as they are not charged they should have no magnetic moment. But they have a small magneic moment, because it contains charged quarks with spin that have a magnetic moment. As the charge is unevenly distributed among the quarks (-1/3,-1/3 and 2/3) these magnetic moments do not cancel each other out.
     
  13. The Imp

    The Imp Kinslayer

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,573
    Location:
    Pentos
    Yes, I know this, but why is the speed of light what it is, and can it be faster or slower unobstructed in vacuum?
     
  14. Perfection

    Perfection The Great Head.

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    49,678
    Location:
    Salisbury Plain
    Nope. As to why? I'm not really sure that's a sensible question. That's just the way it is.
     
  15. The Imp

    The Imp Kinslayer

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,573
    Location:
    Pentos
    Forgive me if I am not satisfied with that answer. :)
     
  16. Perfection

    Perfection The Great Head.

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2002
    Messages:
    49,678
    Location:
    Salisbury Plain
    Well my point is not to belittle your question, but to a certain extent remind that every scientific construct has core values that really don't have theoretical justification, they just are that way. Of course, we might postulate something more fundamental, but that too will have said core values.

    But I think I should point out that in the case of the speed of light the question isn't so much why the speed of light is 299,792,458 m/s rather why every other speed is X fraction of the speed of light? The speed of light is the most fundamental speed in the universe.
     
  17. peter grimes

    peter grimes ... Moderator

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    13,177
    Location:
    Queens, New York
    Are you satisfied with the value of pi? It's the same sort of thing.
     
  18. Yeekim

    Yeekim Chieftain

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    9,472
    Location:
    Estonia
    I really hope I get the English terms right here...

    Anyway, symmetrical convex polyhedron, assuming it is made of material with equal and uniform density, should be stable on any of its faces (when placed on flat surface etc).

    Now, what is the smallest possible number faces any convex polyhedron (still of uniform density) can be stabilized on? A hunch says me it should be three, but can anyone prove it?
     
  19. ParadigmShifter

    ParadigmShifter Random Nonsense Generator

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2007
    Messages:
    21,810
    Location:
    Liverpool, home of Everton FC
    A polyhedron with curved faces? 2 in that case I reckon (a sphere wouldn't be stable) like a boat shape?

    Flat faces - 4 (a tetrahedron).
     
  20. Yeekim

    Yeekim Chieftain

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2006
    Messages:
    9,472
    Location:
    Estonia
    Flat faces.

    But I am quite sure it is possible to construct a tetrahedron that can not be stabilized on one of its four faces - that's why I said three...
    EDIT: or maybe it's not possible :S

    Maybe I was not clear enough: it does not have to be symmetrical any more.
     

Share This Page