What it or some other mathy thing (I don't understand what the hell Godel was talking about) says is we can't know what every particle is doing at all times,
I just vaguely recall something, that I know isn't Hisenberg that provides an additional limit to what we can know. I could be based on Godel's work, it might not be. That's alls I'm sayin'.
"This is our theory of everything. This is our explenation of what has happened and our predictions of what will happen. It's a work in progress and there will be additions and alterations in the years to come. It's a story which is being written right now. Lets see how it ends shall we?".
Apart from this particular narration some of the Discovery type of shows example about nature have still annoying ending narrations like (similar) "this all ended into birth of the most magnificent thing of all known: the human brain".
Those are "additional narrations" that have no any other meaning but add some kind of "yeah, we're so great"-elements to it and strenghten the grotesque and perverted vision of the world with some kind of anthropocentric view.
That is the part of science shows I hate. It's like scienceporn.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.