Thank you Lily, these are very useful benchmarks. In reality, since it is a civ ranking I think it would be more interesting a breakdown per civ. I was referring to victory types because obviously civs should be compared on the same civ condition. Alas I am not able to do a serious test of this myself because my play is erratic (some games are ok, but some games I make horrible mistakes so results would be much more influenced by my erratic ability than by civ strenght). Of course I know that such a test is almost impossible, but I would like to ask you another question: do you think that your ranking is correlated with win times (do you win faster with your higher tiers?), easiness (do you win more easily?) or they are just "theoretical" evaluations of civ traits (btw reading your motivations for the scores was really interesting)?