Interesting. If this is true it would be a backdoor way of essentially invalidating the Electoral College. If all 50 states did this, it would absolutely kill the EC, even without a Constitutional Amendment, which I believe is at the heart of @Commodore 's objection. My understanding is that they did this with some major caveats though... and setup a feedback loop that can't really be resolved. Essentially they said "They have to give up the records, but Trump has some recourse to fight the release of the records, so we're sending it back to the lower Court for him to exercise those options"... which of course is absurd, because they, the SCOTUS, are supposed to be the last recourse... I'll be interested to see if the lower Court just says, "Yeah we already ruled on this and all his recourses are denied, again." Will it then go back to the Supreme Court?