- Feb 7, 2018
What do people think about the nerf to England's foreign conquests in the March 2018 patch?
I'd also reinstate the trade route stacking while we're at it.
We could follow English tradition and write them a Strongly-Worded Letter...I wonder if there is appropriate way we can convince the devs to revert it, without something ridiculous like a petition.
I wonder if there is appropriate way we can convince the devs to revert it, without something ridiculous like a petition.
I was absent for quite a while.. can you please give more details how trade routes were altered with the expansion..?Yeah I'm totally bummed about the nerf to trade in R&F, largely cos trade routes are the only way to build roads. I understand it makes Persia and The Cree's traits a little more important, but I think there needs to be a middle ground.
I prefer this change. Because a) it doesn't make much sense that capturing an enemy city adds to the size of your army. If it was a free worker, that would make a bit more sense, like an alternative to the Eagle warrior's ability. And b) I thought it was boring anyway how many melee units your military ended up having.
Another compromise of mine would be that upon capturing a city, you could decide whether you want to buy a melee unit for half price on that turn, in that city.