Discussion in 'Site Feedback' started by CartesianFart, Feb 16, 2006.
No, they are annoying and painful to look at.
That its content or the users? Whoever gave that rep obviously didnt go to OT either
Okay, I'll grant you there *is* one site I visit where the animated avatars are reasonable. But it's much smaller than this place, and doesn't have as many immature "look at me" posters like we do in OT.
I think it's a work of art.Whether its muture or immature.
Hahaaa! I guess not!
Well, as avatars are there mainly for identification it shouldn't need to be animated .
Another reason... she (<---) couldn't really look much better animated, could she? .
Sounds like a vote for no!
Yeah, I wouldn't mind having my condors flying ! Or even maybe this dude running while on fire!
Pretty-much sums up my view as well.
Would rather have larger avatars.
Here's one that could represent your task as a moderator:
What Padma said.
No. No? No!
I seem to remember seeing somebody with an animated avatar once - it was very subtle though and hardly noticable - that kind was ok. Can't remember who it was now.
Does the forum not allow animated gifs as avatars, or is it just the file size that nails them?
If the avatar fits the size requirements, you can upload an animated avatar. Then we nail you!
What if we make a two frame animated .gif, and both frames are the same picture?
Oh, and no.
There is NO WAY I will ever want animated avatars on this site.
Never! Those avatars make the forum look like a kiddy forum. They slow down the forum, they look terrible, and it would make avatar workers have to work too hard.
Animated avatars can die and burn in
BTW... if we would do anything to avatars, let's make them bigger, in perimeter and file size!
No. They are annoying.
We should have smaller avatars. 51 pixels tall and 61 pixels wide is enough for anyone!
But it cleary said yes
It would be so fun!
She could bounce... girls always seem to capture my almost undivided attention when they are bouncing....
Separate names with a comma.