I personally don't care that much either way for our "neutrality", but it could be used an acceptable reason for not wanting to intervene. It's the intervention by Sweden in Libya by itself and in its current form I'm questioning. I'm curious to see how this turns out. Sweden has close to nothing to gain by attacking Libya and there's always different risks involved when meddling in the Middle East. If this goes to hell like most things do down there, I don't see any good reason to participate in anything in the future that doesn't directly benefit Sweden. I'll just turn off the TV.