• 📚 Admin Project Update: I've added a major feature to PictureBooks.io called Avatar Studio! You can now upload photos to instantly turn your kids (and pets! 🐶) into illustrated characters that star in their own stories. Give it a try and let me know what you think!

Should the US Invade Greenland (Denmark) & Panama

This is false. If you're going to dispute my source, provide one of your own. Don't just make claims that have no source behind them.


Thank you for posting! You have a tendency to disappear when I post something that proves you wrong. So far you have disappeared twice. This will be time number 3:


That was President Cortizo suspending BRI projects over 2019/2020.

If, as a conservative, you would prefer Twitter, here you go:
Being prt of BRI costs nothing. The more significant question is are there actually any active infrastructure deals.
 
Thank you for posting! You have a tendency to disappear when I post something that proves you wrong. So far you have disappeared twice. This will be time number 3:
I'm sorry but you haven't proven anything. A tweet is not any kind of reliable source, unless the person saying it is some authority on the issue. Some random guy does not qualify.
 
I'm sorry but you haven't proven anything. A tweet is not any kind of reliable source, unless the person saying it is some authority on the issue. Some random guy does not qualify.
Sources you don't like are still sources. You can't provide the White House as a source and defend it exactly as I am now and then turn around and say this.

Well, you can, but you probably shouldn't.
 
Sources you don't like are still sources. You can't provide the White House as a source and defend it exactly as I am now and then turn around and say this.

Well, you can, but you probably shouldn't.
The US government is a source. It is not necessarily accurate, but it is a source. Some random dude who's a random nobody on twitter who tweets something is not a source. Hope this helps.
 
Did you just admit to your sources not being accurate?
 
The US government is a source. It is not necessarily accurate, but it is a source. Some random dude who's a random nobody on twitter who tweets something is not a source. Hope this helps.
This could easily be inversed, or mirrored, or however you'd like to change it. You aren't the arbiter of what is or isn't a source. Anything is a source. Verifying, or disproving, that source is a separate step.

Additionally, this was the second source in said post. The first one you haven't mentioned or responded to.
 
Random dude on reddit is still a source.

But it's not an authoritive source.

I got interviewed for a magazine via reddit the other day. It's only an opinion piece on lifestyle though so not authoritative as such lol.
 
I was reminded of an ancient joke today.

Each morning after waking up, every self-respecting Chukotkan first shakes his fist towards Alaska and yells: "Bastards! Paupers!"
Why, you may ask?
It is because those over there only bought Alaska but had no money left to buy Chukotka as well...
 
Last edited:
Danish petition to buy California from Trump :viking:
Danish Values: We’ll bring hygge to Hollywood, bike lanes to Beverly Hills, and organic smørrebrød to every street corner. Rule of law, universal health care and fact based politics might apply.
 
Buying Florida would be better. Trump would no longer be a US citizen and the GOP would lose all those electoral votes.
 
Yeah who would want land that'll be uninhabitable within 20 years.
 
If I am reading the left map key correctly, Greenland might have a huge inland lake or saltwater sea.

1739394644683.png
 
Back
Top Bottom