Size DOES matter!

[boRGa]

hey i think the argument is already done... cause i see that everybody has got a lot of detailed info -and all many of them totally correct- about Turks... i mean if there is an impact of Turks at that scale, and if this nation makes the people curious about its history, it means something is already done... i m a turk and i m disappointed about that... i dunno if there is any subjectivity of Firaxis or not... moreover, our greek friend is some kinda kiddin maybe... or just underestimating turks...

 

[Spawnbob]

turks should be there over some other civs , they are worthy of a civ placement.

In my List why not in no order but alphabetical

America
British
China
Dutch
Egypt
French
Germany
Greece
India
Persia
Roman
Russia
Spain
Turkey
10th Centuary Middle eastern

 

[Cruiser]

What about the Mongols and Carthaginians?

 

[gonzo_for_civ]

I think that the original civ list from civ II should've been retained. But, I guess this way still works and works well. Either way, I LOVE CIV III!!!!!

 

[Cippin]

You include the Dutch and "10th Century Middle Eastern" but not Portugal or the Incas?

 

[CivAl]

How can you include the Dutch? I'm part Dutch meself, but you should replace them with a REAL civ. Incas would be good. Or perhaps Japan. Or even...

 

[Toasty]

How dare you betray your fellow Dutchmen with such slander? . I'm mostly Dutch too, but you shouldn't call the Dutch a 'Non-Real Civ'. They made the English compete for it's colonies, which resulted in the creation of America, India, and many other now-country British colonies.

Then again, I suppose that civilizations like the Turks, Spanish, and Mongols should take precedence...but, I don't know about the Incas. They're kinda in-between and a tough call.