No, the point we're making should be crystal clear to you.
"Africa" is not the same as "the people inhabiting Africa", and "Islam" is not the same as "the people practicing Islam" or even "extremists practicing Islam".
While of course the satellite picture thing was also meant to be lighthearted, I felt it necessary to illustrate the difference a little more directly. And your reaction shows that it was necessary, because you apparently weren't aware of any difference.
So while that doesn't automatically invalidate your position, it means that if you want to use the premise "extremists practicing Islam are violent" to arrive at the conclusion "Islam is violent", you have to outline your reasoning why this is so, because they are certainly not the same.
"Africa" is not the same as "the people inhabiting Africa", and "Islam" is not the same as "the people practicing Islam" or even "extremists practicing Islam".
While of course the satellite picture thing was also meant to be lighthearted, I felt it necessary to illustrate the difference a little more directly. And your reaction shows that it was necessary, because you apparently weren't aware of any difference.
So while that doesn't automatically invalidate your position, it means that if you want to use the premise "extremists practicing Islam are violent" to arrive at the conclusion "Islam is violent", you have to outline your reasoning why this is so, because they are certainly not the same.