[Speculation] Indonesia/Majapahit/Srivijaya

Status
Not open for further replies.

wigwam

Prince
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Messages
555
Location
Berlin
They could call the civ "Indonesia" and still use a Majapahit queen as the leader. We've had similar examples in earlier Civ games—Asoka was the leader of India in Civ IV, for instance. I suppose this time around they did go with "Siam" instead of "Thailand," though.
 

ImperialChaos

President
Joined
Apr 20, 2013
Messages
1,397
Location
United States
Yeah, I'd say Indonesia has a good chance of being included. I am rather ignorant on it's history though so I don't know which leader or possible bonuses it would get.
 

ottobot

Chieftain
Joined
Mar 29, 2013
Messages
28
Location
NYC
Yea, i think indonesia is highly unlikely now that portugal has been stated to be the only naval trade focused civ in the game, though i do think they would have been a great way to give asia more and varied representation
 

cybrxkhan

Asian Xwedodah
Joined
Aug 10, 2006
Messages
9,687
Location
The Universe
Yea, i think indonesia is highly unlikely now that portugal has been stated to be the only naval trade focused civ in the game, though i do think they would have been a great way to give asia more and varied representation

My impression was that they said Portugal was the ultimate naval trade civ in the game, not the only one. As I've suggested i nother threads, Indonesia's focus could tie in other things with trade, such as, say, culture or food bonuses on trade routes or something, so they might not be 100% trade focused, but they still have something.
 

wigwam

Prince
Joined
Mar 23, 2013
Messages
555
Location
Berlin
Doesn't have to be trade at all—they could have a CS-related UA (Majapahit apparently had a huge number of tributary states), a cultural one, a religious one, maybe something completely new. I don't think anybody could've guessed how Austria or Sweden were implemented in G&K, after all.
 
Joined
May 20, 2012
Messages
906
Location
Toronto, Canada
Doesn't have to be trade at all—they could have a CS-related UA (Majapahit apparently had a huge number of tributary states), a cultural one, a religious one, maybe something completely new. I don't think anybody could've guessed how Austria or Sweden were implemented in G&K, after all.

Personally, I doubt that the devs won't add at least a fair connection with trade, since that's hat many people associate them with; err, at least I do...
 

seancolorado

Deity
Joined
Sep 21, 2012
Messages
2,143
Location
Jakarta, Indonesia
My impression was that they said Portugal was the ultimate naval trade civ in the game, not the only one. As I've suggested i nother threads, Indonesia's focus could tie in other things with trade, such as, say, culture or food bonuses on trade routes or something, so they might not be 100% trade focused, but they still have something.

My thoughts as well. There would almost certainly have to be some sort of religious/cultural/food aspect tied into the city-state/trading/naval aspect. Think Siam, with an Indo twist
 

seancolorado

Deity
Joined
Sep 21, 2012
Messages
2,143
Location
Jakarta, Indonesia
Two things make me wonder why Indonesia shouldn't be included:

-Dutch UA is named after their foreign endeavors but it wouldn't have garnered them the famous reputation if not for relations with Indonesia.

-Ed this morning:
We also have an emphasis in this expansion on international trade. Portugal, especially when they set up the trade routes around the horn of Africa over to India...Spice Islands those kinds of things, they were huge players in the international trading game. It would be crazy to have international trading and not have Portugal.

Based on these connections to the Spice Islands, I would say it would be equally crazy to not have these types of mechanics and historical connections and not have Indonesia in some way shape or form. But given the Euro-centrism of civ I wonder if they saw Portugal as the naval-trade civ - as they've mentioned before - and thought that that would be sufficient, and so gave Indonesia Borobudur as it's only shout-out. For better or worse, I'm starting to think that might be the case

Thoughts?
 

Art Grin

Emperor
Joined
Nov 13, 2008
Messages
1,746
Location
Germany
Portugal being the trading civ doesn't disqualify Indonesia in my opinion. In my opinion Indonesia could be a trade-culture-religion civ. We know that religious pressure is exported via trade. Maybe part of Indonesia's UA could revolve around them exporting religion via trade quicker along with something else.
 

Hans Castorp

Prince
Joined
Apr 15, 2013
Messages
359
Location
Cambridge, UK
Two things make me wonder why Indonesia shouldn't be included:

-Dutch UA is named after their foreign endeavors but it wouldn't have garnered them the famous reputation if not for relations with Indonesia.

-Ed this morning:

Based on these connections to the Spice Islands, I would say it would be equally crazy to not have these types of mechanics and historical connections and not have Indonesia in some way shape or form. But given the Euro-centrism of civ I wonder if they saw Portugal as the naval-trade civ - as they've mentioned before - and thought that that would be sufficient, and so gave Indonesia Borobudur as it's only shout-out. For better or worse, I'm starting to think that might be the case

Thoughts?

I am in entire agreement on the desirability of Indonesia, and I still think they could be the key to the mysterious civ-related resource they mentioned. But I honestly thought you had reopened this thread just to prove the gloaters on the Italy thread wrong about no-one caring for Indonesia enough to actually discuss it...
 

seancolorado

Deity
Joined
Sep 21, 2012
Messages
2,143
Location
Jakarta, Indonesia
I am in entire agreement on the desirability of Indonesia, and I still think they could be the key to the mysterious civ-related resource they mentioned. But I honestly thought you had reopened this thread just to prove the gloaters on the Italy thread wrong about no-one caring for Indonesia enough to actually discuss it...

Lol, I reopened this because of Ed's quote above just a few hours ago which had me thinking about the Spice Islands and whether or not their references to it meant anything or if it's just a simple statement that Portugal was an international powerhouse
 

Louis XXIV

Le Roi Soleil
Joined
Mar 12, 2003
Messages
13,579
Location
Norfolk, VA
Two things make me wonder why Indonesia shouldn't be included:

-Dutch UA is named after their foreign endeavors but it wouldn't have garnered them the famous reputation if not for relations with Indonesia.

-Ed this morning:

Based on these connections to the Spice Islands, I would say it would be equally crazy to not have these types of mechanics and historical connections and not have Indonesia in some way shape or form. But given the Euro-centrism of civ I wonder if they saw Portugal as the naval-trade civ - as they've mentioned before - and thought that that would be sufficient, and so gave Indonesia Borobudur as it's only shout-out. For better or worse, I'm starting to think that might be the case

Thoughts?

I think people grasp at very small things with no intent significant meaning behind them and give them a overly-large meaning, such as disqualifying an entire Civ.

I'm not sure I believe Indonesia would be in either, but I see nothing here that disqualifies them.
 

seancolorado

Deity
Joined
Sep 21, 2012
Messages
2,143
Location
Jakarta, Indonesia
Portugal being the trading civ doesn't disqualify Indonesia in my opinion. In my opinion Indonesia could be a trade-culture-religion civ. We know that religious pressure is exported via trade. Maybe part of Indonesia's UA could revolve around them exporting religion via trade quicker along with something else.

I agree, but you wonder if they can make something different enough that doesn't overlap too much with either Portugal's UA or Siam's UA which, if they were never in the game, could be Indonesia's UA.

The religious pressure you mention is the one aspect not used and given Indonesia's religious syncretism (and unique tolerance to religion in the wake of getting bombarded by random international powers left and right) that would be a strong candidate for the UA
 

seancolorado

Deity
Joined
Sep 21, 2012
Messages
2,143
Location
Jakarta, Indonesia
I think people grasp at very small things with no intent significant meaning behind them and give them a overly-large meaning, such as disqualifying an entire Civ.

I'm not sure I believe Indonesia would be in either, but I see nothing here that disqualifies them.

Aware of that. That's why this is a 'speculation' thread. Just something to keep the thoughts running until actual info is released.
 

Louis XXIV

Le Roi Soleil
Joined
Mar 12, 2003
Messages
13,579
Location
Norfolk, VA
Fair enough.

I don't see any contradiction there. The Dutch East India company was important for the Netherlands. It led to the rule over Indonesia, but that doesn't mean Indonesia was important before that point. Indonesia would likely represent their pre-Dutch eras.

The naval trade aspects are important. However, I had thought before this expansion that Portugal would be less likely than we would normally think because it would be hard to find something to separate them from England, the Netherlands, and Spain. From the look of things, Firaxis succeeded admirably. It's possible to think of something else for Indonesia were they to want to - especially because their UU and UB/UI would likely have very little in common with Portugal.

I don't know enough about Indonesia to make a truly educated guess, but how about:
+1 happiness for each city settled on the coast. Extra food for trade routes between your own cities.

That would represent the archipelago nature of Indonesia and the fact that it's one of the larger populations in the world. Their UB could represent their cultural aspects without much difficulty.
 

cybrxkhan

Asian Xwedodah
Joined
Aug 10, 2006
Messages
9,687
Location
The Universe
At this point I still see Indonesia and Vietnam as the most likely contenders for a new Asia civ (with a Silk Road civ not too far behind). Given the Eurocentrism of the Civ series, it's a zero-sum game in this case. We'll see.
 

cybrxkhan

Asian Xwedodah
Joined
Aug 10, 2006
Messages
9,687
Location
The Universe
Which Silk Road civs?

I'm too lazy to look it up, but in the 1304701385701385 post thread about new civs, I posted a list of Silk Road civs I considered possible.

Out of all those possibilities, the ones I consider most likely would be the Timurids, followed by the long-shots in the form of the Khazars and Kushans (who have been mentioned by fans several times in other places). Other long-shot possibilities I considered were the Seljuks, Gokturks, Khitan, Uighurs... that's all I remember. Others I've considered since then would be the Sogdians, Parthians, some sort of Afghanistan civ (but focusing on an earlier history of Afghanistan, like the Durrani or Ghaznavids or something) But of those I'd say the Timurids have the best chance, if only because of Tamerlane.
 

Nirosi

Hymenopus Coronatus
Joined
May 22, 2011
Messages
172
Location
Princeloverburgh, Germany
Maybe Indonesia should import science from all civiliztions (even less developed) but also import all religions twice as fast.The candi will give a bonus for different religions that the ability is approved.Indonesia becomes a very multicultural/multireligional, developed civilization.
 

Hakan-i Cihan

Emperor
Joined
Nov 21, 2005
Messages
1,461
Location
Netherlands
Lol, I reopened this because of Ed's quote above just a few hours ago which had me thinking about the Spice Islands and whether or not their references to it meant anything or if it's just a simple statement that Portugal was an international powerhouse
The spice island part let me think of an indirect/passive bonus to international trade routes. Indonesia could get extra bonusses (not necessarily gold) for trade routes from other civs to their cities. Since this bonus is not entirely in the players hand and could be a copy of the portugese UA the Indonesian UA could be accompanied with other elements.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom