I’ve noticed that many people are now looking at a brotherly protection of the smaller and weaker nations rather than extend our empire to include these nations we wish to see them have their own autonomy. We also seem worry of the military threat that China poses to both her neighbours on the other continent and to her future threat to us. Therefore I propose the following plan we gain RoP with America and Russia and begin building a few fortifications individual bases within these two countries and station troops in these areas in which to help protect Russia and America from a possible Chinese invasion until further reinforcements arrive from Japan. This should give us the critical time needed that could make the difference between the saviours of these nations. When possible I would like a mutual protection pact be signed between these nations a series of network alliances aimed at off-setting Chinese aggression at a later date I would like the Aztecs be included these troops will not act aggressively towards china unless in the likely event of a Chinese invasion of Russia, America and maybe at a latter time Aztecs. Here are the following options that are being polled:
Plan A: A series of fortifications built in America and Russia acting as bases for Peacekeepers acting in a defensive manner and in no way aggressively towards any nation, these peacekeepers may intervene in the defence of the nation they are stationed at from a aggressive nation, this however will be first be decided by the people before any military action is taken by the Peacekeepers. These Peacekeepers will give enough time for reinforcements from Japan to come and rescue any nation in danger and enough preparing time needed to assemble a expedition force to be assembled aimed at liberation (Highly advisable, low risk to Japan)
Plan B: A rapid deployment force would simply be having troops in transports escorted by naval vessels stationed near the coasts but outside of borders (limits the mobility of the navy and therefore exposes our coastline for attack, a unadvisable option).
Plan C: Some fortresses inland will handle some lasting engagements, but a Marine Corps should be in place for long mobile coast runs. This allows for fewer ships to be used in operations than Plan B (also a highly advisable option, low risk to Japan).
Abstain
Here is a link to the discussion of stationing troops overseas in the citizen forum to get an idea of the debates of the issue.
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=104846&page=1
Plan A: A series of fortifications built in America and Russia acting as bases for Peacekeepers acting in a defensive manner and in no way aggressively towards any nation, these peacekeepers may intervene in the defence of the nation they are stationed at from a aggressive nation, this however will be first be decided by the people before any military action is taken by the Peacekeepers. These Peacekeepers will give enough time for reinforcements from Japan to come and rescue any nation in danger and enough preparing time needed to assemble a expedition force to be assembled aimed at liberation (Highly advisable, low risk to Japan)
Plan B: A rapid deployment force would simply be having troops in transports escorted by naval vessels stationed near the coasts but outside of borders (limits the mobility of the navy and therefore exposes our coastline for attack, a unadvisable option).
Plan C: Some fortresses inland will handle some lasting engagements, but a Marine Corps should be in place for long mobile coast runs. This allows for fewer ships to be used in operations than Plan B (also a highly advisable option, low risk to Japan).
Abstain
Here is a link to the discussion of stationing troops overseas in the citizen forum to get an idea of the debates of the issue.
http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=104846&page=1