Hello!
Once again posting some random suggestion, but yet another irritating feature (if I remember correctly this was allready present in vanilla colonization)
When you conquer city from enemy european, if that city was founded on indian grounds, EVEN if you raze the city the indians consider you as stealing the ground. In my current game I was allmost the whole game in excellent relationship with sioux tribe, haven defence pacts and everything. We ended up in war with the Dutch (due the defence pact) and when I managed to conquer one of the dutch cityes Sixous declered war agains since I took their lands.
----
Solution what I was thinking would be that if you conquer a land that used to be indian territory, game would first of all inform you it during the choice when decideing either to raze or keep. If you raze the city it would cause liberation bonus for the native tribe and if you keep the city, it makes sense that they would hate you for it.
Once again posting some random suggestion, but yet another irritating feature (if I remember correctly this was allready present in vanilla colonization)
When you conquer city from enemy european, if that city was founded on indian grounds, EVEN if you raze the city the indians consider you as stealing the ground. In my current game I was allmost the whole game in excellent relationship with sioux tribe, haven defence pacts and everything. We ended up in war with the Dutch (due the defence pact) and when I managed to conquer one of the dutch cityes Sixous declered war agains since I took their lands.
----
Solution what I was thinking would be that if you conquer a land that used to be indian territory, game would first of all inform you it during the choice when decideing either to raze or keep. If you raze the city it would cause liberation bonus for the native tribe and if you keep the city, it makes sense that they would hate you for it.