I am totally amped for Black Widow
Me too.
, which has gotten me thinking about comparisons between comics and movies. Black Widow in the comics, to me, was a meh, sort of a Hawkeye sidekick and I thought Hawkeye was sort of a sidekick to start with. Don't know where the balance lies among better writing, changed perspectives, and S.J. portraying a character just brilliantly, but Black Widow in the MCU has pretty well stolen the show IMO. Gigantic tilt towards the MCU.
I was partial to Iron Man comics, and I think R.D. made an exceptional Tony Stark...so...a draw I guess.
Despite C.E. doing great and not taking anything away from him, comics Cap was a lot deeper I think so comics on this one.
C.H. benefits immensely from a lot of the most hilarious lines in the MCU having been written for him and I never thought Thor was anything but another overpowered Superman clone in the comics so another heavy tilt to the MCU.
Hawkeye as I already said was more like a sidekick in the comics IMO, and despite strong play by J.R. that never really went away...maybe just because it went so much stronger with Black Widow that even if there was a big improvement it just seems small still. Another draw, in a less good way than with Iron Man.
Hulk was sort of a non-entity for me in the comics. "Hulk smash" was way too trite and the endless Banner pity party was worse. The MCU and M.R. made salad out of something else on this one, and maybe get even more credit for having failed twice before in films. Big tilt to MCU.
Ant-man and the Wasp. Almost always taken together in the comics, almost always taken together in the MCU, so together here. In the comics this was the hardest disbelief suspension task Marvel ever assigned, IMO, and I had a hard time with getting it enough to enjoy the characters much at all. I think P.R. and E.L. did great with what they had and that M.D as the original Hank Pym was brilliant, but the MCU tried harder to paint a "look, really, sciencey" veneer over the absurdity that only made things worse. Tilt to the comics.
Black Panther was a lot more enigmatic in the comics than in the MCU. I like them both, but in such totally different ways that even though I was thinking about it pretty much from the start of this post I can't call it. So totally different I can't really even call it a draw.
There are more, obviously, but long post already. I seem to be pretty tilted towards the MCU. Anyone see it a lot differently?
I know Black Widow mainly from her time in
Daredevil, but she was a supporting character in that, too. Johansson's portrayal has hinted at a lot without exploring much of it. In some cases, an enigmatic character is best left a mystery - sometimes the mystery is the whole point, and the hints we get are enough. Han Solo and The Joker are two such characters, for me, who aren't meant to have fully-realized backgrounds. I haven't seen
Joker and
Han Solo was decent, but kind of forgettable. Another such character is Shepherd Book in
Firefly and
Serenity; some people demanded more, but I think we got all we needed. The fact that his background is mysterious is part of the character: "You're gonna have to tell me about that sometime." "No, I don't."
So I would understand if someone thought Johansson's Natasha was one of those characters. We hear about Budapest a couple of times, for example, and we know that's meant to explain the bond she has with Clint, but we aren't supposed to be privy to the details. Likewise, the "red in [her] ledger": Obviously, she did some Bad Things, maybe ruined some people who didn't deserve to be ruined, killed some people who didn't deserve to die. There's a 90-second scene that I love in
The Winter Soldier that tells us a lot about Natasha - or, depending on how you look at it, nothing at all.
Steve: "You know it's kind of hard to trust someone when you don't know who that someone really is."
Natasha: "Yeah." <-- and there's a lot in the way she says "Yeah" and then sort of looks away and pauses
"Who do you want me to be?"
Steve: "How about a friend?"
Natasha: (chuckles) "Well, there's a chance you might be in the wrong business, Rogers."
And that's about all we know about her, I guess? Anyway, I'd get it if some people felt we're not supposed to know much about her, like Heath Ledger's Joker, whose story about how he got his scars kept changing. But I've come to want more of her. No, not like that, get your mind out of the gutter.
Well, okay, yeah, like that - but not only like that. And she's formed interesting relationships with people on the Avengers. She came into it with a shared history with Clint, but I loved her frustrated romance with Bruce...
Scott: "Have either of you ever studied quantum physics?"
Natasha: "Only to make conversation."
...and her time on the run with Steve after
Civil War begs for a story. They could have been fighting any number of 2nd- or 3rd-rate Marvel villains. Likewise, the only thing we know about the 5-year gap between
Inifinity War and
Endgame is that Natasha was running herself ragged trying to hold the world together, feeling guilty about Clint's family ("Auntie Nat!") and taking over from the dead Nick Fury and the retired Tony Stark in leading the remaining Avengers.