Supreme Court grants gay marriage cases

The Mayans were correct by describing the end of the world, with this happening it is no wonder they knew how the world was going to end.

This is a steaming, hyperbolic pile. The wane of your particular religious hegemony means exactly nothing to the "end of the world." It will neither summon meteors nor open black holes. Wedding cakes will have two ken dolls on them and you'll have a tantrum. A lot of red-faced Southern Baptist preachers will have aneurisms on stage. In a decade nobody will care. It will be like a Catholic president, like weed, like cussing on TV, like internet porn, like cohabitation, like no-fault divorce, like Carl Sagan, like evolution. Like every other time you guys get hopped up on BS and start running around screaming at the top of your lungs.

The world will keep spinning, mocking you with every rotation.
 
The Mayans were correct by describing the end of the world, with this happening it is no wonder they knew how the world was going to end.

So, come 22nd December, what will be your next plan of attack?
 
This is a steaming, hyperbolic pile. The wane of your particular religious hegemony means exactly nothing to the "end of the world." It will neither summon meteors nor open black holes. Wedding cakes will have two ken dolls on them and you'll have a tantrum. A lot of red-faced Southern Baptist preachers will have aneurisms on stage. In a decade nobody will care. It will be like a Catholic president, like weed, like cussing on TV, like internet porn, like cohabitation, like no-fault divorce, like Carl Sagan, like evolution. Like every other time you guys get hopped up on BS and start running around screaming at the top of your lungs.

The world will keep spinning, mocking you with every rotation.

Some people will still care. It may be far from a majority, but its not like nobody will care...

I probably won't care. I've got far better things to worry about than what marriages the government recognizes. I will, of course, morally object to it, as I do morally object to most of the things on that list, but the government legalizing it won't change anything.

The Mayans were correct by describing the end of the world, with this happening it is no wonder they knew how the world was going to end.

:rotfl:
 
You don't care, except when you care enough to call teh gayz polygamist incest botz.

And then keep doing it for four pages.
 
This is a slippery slope - some here might be tempted to marry their left hand if the ring didn't interfere with the consummation.
 
You don't care, except when you care enough to call teh gayz polygamist incest botz.

And then keep doing it for four pages.

I can have an opinion without freaking out about it.

This isseu annoys me, but most other issues downright anger me. Comparatively speaking, I don't care much.

I do care about the radicals who want to marginalize everyone who disagrees with them, however.
 
I do care about the radicals who want to marginalize everyone who disagrees with them, however.

What a meaningless statement. Now you sound like a politician.
 
I can have an opinion without freaking out about it.
My point being that you are completely disengenuous everytime you say 'I don't care blah blah blah' then spend a whole thread defending a crazy stance that you apparently don't actually hold or care about.

This isseu annoys me, but most other issues downright anger me. Comparatively speaking, I don't care much.
I think you'd find that 'most' other issues would be a lot less anger-inducing if you tried reading people's posts and actually considering them. I don't mean you should agree with everyone, but you have this incredible ability to just ignore fact-based arguments that inconvenience your views and then go on for pages and pages making the exact same point that others have thoroughly refuted instead of moving on to some other line of debate or ceding even one inch.

Then people dog pile and troll you - though I sympathize with you - you don't help yourself at all.

I do care about the radicals who want to marginalize everyone who disagrees with them, however.
Please understand this sentence fully applies to you as well.
 
I think you'd find that 'most' other issues would be a lot less anger-inducing if you tried reading people's posts and actually considering them. I don't mean you should agree with everyone, but you have this incredible ability to just ignore fact-based arguments that inconvenience your views and then go on for pages and pages making the exact same point that others have thoroughly refuted instead of moving on to some other line of debate or ceding even one inch.

Then people dog pile and troll you - though I sympathize with you - you don't help yourself at all.

I suppose that I should say I don't care much about SSM. I do technically have an opinion, and that is they should recognize civil unions, but not marriage. I suppose I should say I don't care the way that most of the Evangelicals around me do... I despise the extremism on "My side" (Although there aren't really extremists on my side, all extremists on this issue oppose civil unions and some support recriminalization) more than I oppose moderates on the other side. And if I liked someone's views on everything but SSM, I'd still gladly vote for that candidate.

Other issues are anger-inducing not because people have different views on them... my anger isn't really at people who disagree with me, but at the state itself for ruining lives.
 
I suppose that I should say I don't care much about SSM. I do technically have an opinion, and that is they should recognize civil unions, but not marriage. I suppose I should say I don't care the way that most of the Evangelicals around me do... I despise the extremism on "My side" (Although there aren't really extremists on my side, all extremists on this issue oppose civil unions and some support recriminalization) more than I oppose moderates on the other side. And if I liked someone's views on everything but SSM, I'd still gladly vote for that candidate.

Other issues are anger-inducing not because people have different views on them... my anger isn't really at people who disagree with me, but at the state itself for ruining lives.

According to your precious constitution, separate but equal is a no-no

Edit: You should be in favour of SSM anyway because then you can marry your idol, St Ronald of Paul.
 
Well, because you seem to be in love with him and his "government" is small enough it wouldn't hurt the first time.



EDIT: Sorry, couldn't resist! :D
 
I'd have laughed my head off at Sacha, and told him to pull his kex up. Hey, do you think Ron Paul's really a closet homosexual?
 
Back
Top Bottom