System Requirements?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I just bought and built a new computer last week in anticipation of Civ 5. Played it "safe" with my specs.


Intel i7 920 2.67 GHz Quad Core
6 GB RAM DDR3
ATI Radeon 4850 512 MB
1 TB HD
23" LG 1080 p Monitor
Windows 7 64 bit

I assume this will make a smooth Civ 5 experience. I can click on the Civ IV icon and be in a loaded game in 30 seconds or less.
 
I just bought and built a new computer last week in anticipation of Civ 5. Played it "safe" with my specs.


Intel i7 920 2.67 GHz Quad Core
6 GB RAM DDR3
ATI Radeon 4850 512 MB
1 TB HD
23" LG 1080 p Monitor
Windows 7 64 bit

I assume this will make a smooth Civ 5 experience. I can click on the Civ IV icon and be in a loaded game in 30 seconds or less.

couple Questions

1) why not get an i3 or i5 and überclock it to ~4GHz? (your i7 would be an overclock powerhouse)
2) how many RAM slots does your computer have?
3) why not get a better GPU? (DX11)
4) why not a 64GB SSD boot drive (+civ)?
 
it's not that hard to overclock an i3 to 4GHz, many guides out there... also that i7 can be overclocked to 2.8 GHz easily
 
couple Questions

1) why not get an i3 or i5 and überclock it to ~4GHz? (your i7 would be an overclock powerhouse)
2) how many RAM slots does your computer have?
3) why not get a better GPU? (DX11)
4) why not a 64GB SSD boot drive (+civ)?


Because I am simply not that advanced of a techie! I know enough to get a good machine and do the basics. I have 3 more open RAM slots and can also upgrade my video card one day. Trust me, this is much more than I need....
 
Because I am simply not that advanced of a techie! I know enough to get a good machine and do the basics. I have 3 more open RAM slots and can also upgrade my video card one day. Trust me, this is much more than I need....
That rig would be cheaper once the game comes out, even more so since video cards tend to devaluate rapidly. Motherboards also dip in price rapidly. When Civ actually comes out you could have bought this rig and get civ and possibly get a better video card all for the rpice you payed now. Well done! :goodjob:
 
Well, Civ inspired me no doubt to upgrade... but I needed a new computer anyway. Your logic is true, but we always play catch up in technology. Might as well just dive in now.

If need be, I will get more RAM and a new GPU in a year--that is IF CIV V needs it. I don't really play any other games other than some EA sports games. In the meantime, I am more than confident that Civ V will fly on this. Or at least be much more than adequate. Believe me, I have played Civ IV with underpowered computers for years and still enjoy the game. In the meantime, the next 9 months or so I can enjoy Civ IV at lightspeed.
 
it's not that hard to overclock an i3 to 4GHz, many guides out there... also that i7 can be overclocked to 2.8 GHz easily

underachiever, that I-7 can be air oc'd to 4+ ghz.
 
Well somehow, after getting a new desktop computer. The RAM requirement suddenly became a non-issue for me :lol:
 
If need be, I will get more RAM and a new GPU in a year--that is IF CIV V needs it.

It will if you want to get the most out of the game's graphics. That card you're looking at is a DirectX 10 card, Civ 5 will be capable of displaying DirectX 11 effects.
 
It will if you want to get the most out of the game's graphics. That card you're looking at is a DirectX 10 card, Civ 5 will be capable of displaying DirectX 11 effects.

Which dont forget requires him to upgrade to Win 7 to display those effects as well. So thats an additional cost of adoption.
 
Which dont forget requires him to upgrade to Win 7 to display those effects as well. So thats an additional cost of adoption.

He already intends on getting Windows 7. If you're going to spend a bundle on new gear, it makes sense to upgrade your OS as well. XP is going to be obsolete fairly soon.
 
go ultimate for 64 bit
 
I am far from being expert in any way in PC hardware, but recently I've spent some days scanning the net for info, and as present? I cannot find any better price-wise as the Core i5 750 plus a Radeon 5750 1GB card, with ASRock P55 Extreme and 4GB G.Skill RAM.
I am on wait, though, will purchase only in August or so...
 
you want triple channel, not dual
 
maybe, but there are financial limits... :(

Just make sure you get a motherboard that supports triple channel. You could always add a couple of gigs of RAM later to get it working. Also be sure that your'e getting DDR3 RAM, and a motherboard that supports it.
 
The only tri-channel ones out there just now though are the ones that go with the I7-900 series, and beyond the entry level 920 once you get into that kind of range, the price/performance ratio gets blown out the window. You can achieve some phenominal benches with a system like that, but unless you have a specific reason for needing that kind of power you're not likely to see much benefit from it.

As much as it pains me to say as something of an AMD processor fanboy, the best value for money right now seems to be the core i5s. The Phenom II X4s are always good too, and there's supposedly a new lower-power version of them due out soon as well as some decored X6 models.

DDR3 is the way to go generally now that the prices seem to have swung, but so long as you've got a decent amount of RAM a good AM2+ mobo will definately do you well for a long time yet if you're upgrading.

As for the graphics cards, DX11 is still new enough that its all a bit muddled. The ATI cards have a dedicated tesselator that's identical across the entire range, so on certain applications that might rely more heavily on that in the future it could well bottleneck them. If your motherboards capable of it, the 5770 and potentially adding more in Crossfire down the line seems to be the best option just now - in some of the DX11 benchmarks they literally scale by 100% since its the tesselator that's the bottleneck.

As for nvidia, well... there's only their high end stuff out just now and its not exactly refined. There's a secondary chip (GF104) due relatively soon that a lot of people have hopes is going to make the mid range (read: sensibly priced) market a bit more competitive again. I personally have an SLI board (780a) and my plan is to get one of the decent mid-range cards with an SLI upgrade path for futureproofing, but its kind of dependant on them not requiring a nuclear reactor and its coolant attached to run the damn things.
 
The only tri-channel ones out there just now though are the ones that go with the I7-900 series, and beyond the entry level 920 once you get into that kind of range, the price/performance ratio gets blown out the window.

My understanding was that all DDR3 mobos used triple-channel.

As for nvidia, well... there's only their high end stuff out just now and its not exactly refined. There's a secondary chip (GF104) due relatively soon that a lot of people have hopes is going to make the mid range (read: sensibly priced) market a bit more competitive again. I personally have an SLI board (780a) and my plan is to get one of the decent mid-range cards with an SLI upgrade path for futureproofing, but its kind of dependant on them not requiring a nuclear reactor and its coolant attached to run the damn things.

I've been wondering about what's happening with Nvidia these days. I've become fairly loyal to that line, and heard that they were going to release a DirectX 11 card, but it sounds like it's not a good time to consider them at the moment. Not that it really matters though, I certainly can't afford a new video card right now. I'm pretty happy with my 8800GT though and I suspect that it will be good enough to run Civ 5. I just won't get all the DirectX 11 bells & whistles.
 
My understanding was that all DDR3 mobos used triple-channel.

Nah, its only the i7s, which were the very first DDR3 ones launched. All the other i3/i5s (and confusingly, the i7-800s) are dual channel DDR3. The point was right though, only slightly mislabled - DDR3 is now almost exactly equal in price and as demand shifts to it, it'll be cheaper going forward. If you've got a DDR2 board though, its more than good enough and still should be for quite a while, and with most of the AMD processor range working with either DDR2 or 3 memory it means you dont have to make a full upgrade.

As far as I know, I think its only the Intel Core i7s and X58 boards that are tri-channel, I dont think there's any AMD option in the home market.

I've been wondering about what's happening with Nvidia these days. I've become fairly loyal to that line, and heard that they were going to release a DirectX 11 card, but it sounds like it's not a good time to consider them at the moment. Not that it really matters though, I certainly can't afford a new video card right now. I'm pretty happy with my 8800GT though and I suspect that it will be good enough to run Civ 5. I just won't get all the DirectX 11 bells & whistles.

DX11 is still new enough that there arent many options either on the hardware or software side just now, but from all I've seen and heard it looks like it COULD be a game changer in a few years. I really dont think there's any real need to upgrade beyond what you've got for the most part - I recall reading somewhere that the current-gen consoles are roughly on a par with a Geforce 7900, so the majority of cross-platform titles arent going to push much further than that. Civ will actually probably be one of the first major PC exclusives that you can really get anything out of by pushing the graphics right up.

There are a load of mid range cards from nvidia due over the summer and there should be a lineup refresh from ATI round about the time that Civ is due, but there will probably not be any significant advancements on either side for quite a while yet. Its been fairly well publicised that the main plant manufacturing the chips is having some serious issues with yeild - some of the rumours have even been that less than 1% of the chips on the latest nvidia batch were usable and even that every individual GTX480 was costing nvidia $1000 and they're selling at a loss! Considering the difficulty they're having at the most basic level of getting the current new gen 'right', I'd guess its pretty unlikely that we're going to see anything major for a while yet.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom