Team Fortress 2 Mafia: Game Thread [concluded]

I try to post what I think. I do not think it is valid reason to put me on your list. So, I understand you have something else against me

Okay then: What are your thoughts at the moments? What are your town reads, what are your scum reads?
 
CivGeneral, you are aware it's entirely possible (i'd even say likely) that the Mafia killed CivCube to put suspicion on Visorslash?
Something which you seem to be almost endorsing.
You're not a new player, surely you can't be making such rookie errors unintentionally?

...
In any case, i'm still voting JoanK.
Because I can.
 
In any case, i'm still voting JoanK.
Because I can.

backpain-1277406949.jpg


MGS, what are your thoughts?
 
Wow, man, I'm sure beating some kind of record if I can be voted after dead :cooool:
 
Ah, I would have enjoyed so much a death by lynch... now that it was getting funny, and I died. What a pity... nightkilled, meh.
 
Oooooh!
YOU were the Heavy!
Excellent.

In that case, unvote: JoanK, vote: CivGeneral for the reasons in my previous post.

Why are you so happy about the death of a fellow layer? That seems awfully scummy to me? You better have a good reason, since we know JoanK was a good guy in this game, and your delight at the death of a good guy is not very flattering for you.

vote:mgsmuhammad
 
Visorslash, you are a better Mafia player than to accuse someone who accuse you with false information. Unvote, Vote: Visorslash.

There's something different this round. What is it?
 
Why are you so happy about the death of a fellow layer? That seems awfully scummy to me? You better have a good reason, since we know JoanK was a good guy in this game, and your delight at the death of a good guy is not very flattering for you.

vote:mgsmuhammad

Because it means I can now turn my attentions on someone else.
In case you hadn't noticed, i'd wasted two days worth of votes trying to lynch him.
Having the opportunity to now move across to another who I deem more deserving is surprisingly liberating.
 
CivGeneral, you are aware it's entirely possible (i'd even say likely) that the Mafia killed CivCube to put suspicion on Visorslash?
Something which you seem to be almost endorsing.
You're not a new player, surely you can't be making such rookie errors unintentionally?

...
In any case, i'm still voting JoanK.
Because I can.

Oooooh!
YOU were the Heavy!
Excellent.

In that case, unvote: JoanK, vote: CivGeneral for the reasons in my previous post.
Whoh, whoh, whoh!! Back that train up there. First of all, it's not a rookie error. My gut instincts tell me that the guy I voted for is suspicious. Especially given to the evidence presented on the table. Given that Visorslash quickly voted for me and given that I am on his hit list, it's only logical to make that he's trailing into the scumminess zone.

If you are interested in my findings, I will PM you to clear that vote off.
 
vote: CivGeneral Visorslash has been doing his best to lead the effort to find the RED scum. Sure he has come across as somewhat abrasive, but I do think he is being sincere in his efforts. An attempt to eliminate him at this time strikes me as fishy. Did your action against him last night give you more information about him that you just haven’t made public?
 
I was going to ask if there would be any BLU spies, but went back to the player list and found one had been killed. So the question becomes how many there are.

I don't think CivGeneral is a good suspect, but I'm asking him for a private explanation.

I don't like the attitude of mgsmuhammed at all. Both of the posts just quoted by CivGeneral sound a very strong RED alert to me. The first one sounds a little too much like PIS. And voting JoanK isn't a mistake a RED would make, unless making it by mistake to make us think he has to be BLU.

Vote: mgsmuhammed
 
And voting JoanK isn't a mistake a RED would make, unless making it by mistake to make us think he has to be BLU.

Of course.
I am such a masterful mafioso that I lay plans within plans.

CLEARLY I am not being a needlessly stubborn townie.
NO-ONE would be foolish enough to seriously concentrate their efforts against set individuals permanently, as mafioso and townies alike need to keep their votes flexible and fluid, to exploit the changing opinion of the masses.
As such, my decision to vote individuals without many votes to their names, and then keep hounding them till they die (even inadvertantly beyond, in the case of JoanK), must clearly be a COLOSSAL scumslip.

Now, if you'll kindly leave me be, I must continue my planception to be able to stay 5 days ahead for the good of the Red.

If you'd be willing to share your findings, CivGeneral, that would be much appreciated.
But the vote stays for now.
 
Well, CivCube was lynched and has been on Visorslash's hit list on his signature for quite some time before he changed his signature shortly after the update. I'd think that's grounds for suspicion.
This looks like seriously bad reasoning.

Yesterday, I was ultra-suspicious of Zack and his side-kick CivCube, so I don't hold it against Visorslash that he was too - and of course, once Zack flipped town, reason for suspecting civcube vanished.

vote: CivGeneral
 
Vote:Visorslash

Voting for completly different reasons than CivGeneral. Instead, I think having this "hit list" is just a scummy act. You are trying to get the attention away from you, and you do this by advertising a list of people who you add onto for the flimsiest of reasons.
 
Hmm.
Now I don't quite know what to think.
Unvote: CivGeneral, Vote: Daveshack, in accordance with the prophecy.

In accordance with what? :confused:
 
Back
Top Bottom