With respect to 40J's opinion,
I am a person of strong convictions - I make my points and stand by them. Once a decision has been made, I have, and will continue, support that decision. As an example, in spite of the turn-chat decision not going the direction I prefer, I voted to ratify that Article. Why - because the citizens made the choice.
As much as anyone, I have always stood up for the rights of all citizens, including those who participate soley through the forums. I have always respected and supported the laws, working within them to make changes. I have always demanded from the elected leaders that they honor the duties and responsibilities they accepted when elected to office. Others have not been able to do that, putting personal preference over the needs of all citizens.
The rights of citizens should not be goverened by the whims of the majority, but by the needs of all. So long as a law violates no law above it, as a member of the Judiciary I would be duty-bound to accept, support and defend that law. Only if there is a conflict with a higher law should a law passed by the citizens be struck down.
My thanks to all for your consideration and support!
-- Ravensfire