The Bible and Us!?

Do You Believe In The Bible?

  • Yes!

    Votes: 13 20.0%
  • No!

    Votes: 31 47.7%
  • Kinda Sorta Maybe

    Votes: 9 13.8%
  • Other

    Votes: 11 16.9%
  • The Bi-Ble... What Is That?

    Votes: 1 1.5%

  • Total voters
    65
Status
Not open for further replies.
"The very fact that you are talking 'orbits' means you don't believe the watertight evidence of the quotes from Psalms above. Or do you deny the bible?"

What?!? How do you get that out of my comment?
 
Brad:
Psalms says the Earth does not move, ever. You say it is in an orbit. Who is wrong?
 
"Psalms says the Earth does not move, ever. You say it is in an orbit. Who is wrong?"

Psalms doesn't say the Earth doesn't move. I told you that it is saying that it is in firm orbit, which means that niether of us is wrong
 
Psalms says that the earth is 'not to be moved forever' - there is absolutely nothing there about orbits. According to Psalms the earth is immovably fixed. If you can find me a quote about orbits, or the earth going round the sun, then that's fine. But I can't see it anywhere.
Psalms seems quite definite that the earth doesn't move, no way, no how.
 
Yes, it doesn't say anything about orbits. However the BBL was written in a way so as to leave room for interperation. That way it would require faith to know the truth, other wise God would be speaking at us from the heavens saying "I do exist you morons" :)

That is why faith is faith. If we all KNEW God existed we wouldn't need faith.
 
Easy excuse brad.Then we can also make inter perations of other parts...
Like from the snake and the apple you can then alseo say there where in the anient times talking snakes:rolleyes:
 
OK, so how does 'not to moved forever' leave room for interpretation?
 
Whatever buddy... It's quite obviouse that we are all firmly embedded in our "faith" in whatever we believe. Neither of us will budge. That's fine to each his own. I have no qualms about you not believing what I believe.

BTW: No hard feelings :goodjob:
 
Hey, before anything else cont me in on the peacemakers club :D.

All right, here I go:

Originally posted by Brad
Isaiah 40:22 "There is One {GOD} who is Dwelling above the CIRCLE OF THE EARTH..."

Oh, if it were “above the SPHERE of the earth”… very different shapes, you know. But I guess its just semantics, am I right?

Originally posted by Brad
Job 26:7 states "He is... Hanging the Earth upon nothing"

This sentence looks conveniently edited. Clearly, it says that SOMEONE is “hanging the earth” upon nothing, but the ellipses will not allow me to see who. I assume that it is God.

Technically, earth is not “hanging”, as well as technically, it’s not “upon nothing”, it’s held by the very real sun’s gravity. But I won’t make a point about it, because it would be incoherent with my line of thinking that it’s foolish to interpret the bible literally.

I won’t say that it’s reasonable interpretation until I see the entire sentence (or the context that allow us to know who it is referring to and why), but it could end up in a defendable line of thinking… though hardly enough to make you assume that they had even brute knowledge of universal gravitation.

Originally posted by Brad
Yes but the BBL showed that God had love for mankind, it shows that he put thought into our creation, which is more then just a display of power, but it is even moreso a display of his love. And if we did evolve... why haven't we evolved further... "X-Men" anybody.

Oh, but we ARE evolving. Evolution has not reached a climax yet. In fact it’s unlikely that evolution will ever have a climax.

See, evolution is about “adaptation”. Generally, it means improvement, because when various adaptations shows up, the better ones survive, the others are extinguished. It’s a very slow process, but it’s noticeable at the long run. Not that those adaptations are intrinsically better, they can be just convenient.

Hypothetical example: Somehow, the sun stops shining (and miraculously life in earth does not change, except the fact that we cannot see anything due to the lack of light). Like happens to blind people today, we would develop other senses and rely less and less in vision.

As time passes, that information will be printed in genes. Other senses will get stronger and stronger, and the eyes would start to disappear. This process happened in the real world, with fish that lives in deep waters, too deep for light to reach. They have no eyes or residual and inoperative eyes, or they have biological light. Adaptations.

Not that such new human senses would be naturally better than vision… but they would be more fit to the environment, and therefore, topically better. It's all about biological convenience.

When it goes to humans, why do you thing that the darker skin tones majorities are in the hotter countries? It’s because the pigmentation helps to protect against sunlight. Simple as that. It disappeared in the colder countries because less protection is necessary.

Evolution system is bound to reality. Comparing it to the x-man is to be joking, because comics rely on exaggerations. In their world, there are lots of aliens, ships that travel to outer space in minutes, immortal humans and divine beings with physical shapes and constant appearances all the time.

Oh, anyway, I realize you were just kidding, its just that I like being emphatic.

Regards :D.
 
Originally posted by God know who
I believe you are right, it was around the year 1500, much earlier than the reformation.

But who said that it was later?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I don't even know why this came up.

Whoops!

Originally posted by Brad
In genesi it is said that God formed man

And he couldn't of formed man by evolution?

He gave Adam and Eve a command in the BBL. to become many and fill the Earth. It just doesn't make sense.

Well ,I don't believe in Adam an dEve so I won't argue.

"The size of the universe and the size of the earliest forms of life mean that this would be a VERY impressive task"
Yes but the BBL showed that God had love for mankind, it shows that he put thought into our creation, which is more then just a display of power, but it is even moreso a display of his love. And if we did evolve... why haven't we evolved further... "X-Men" anybody.

My comment was in answer to your thing about evolution being an insult to the power of God. If evolution is the way then that does not mean that God loves man any less or that God just sat back to watch what happens.

If they belive in God and the BBL (which you didn't say, but let's presume you ment to for the sake of argument )

All Christians take the bible seriously, but not all take it lirerally. I think I said this already (I'm not going back to check) but I'll say it again:

ALL Christians take the bible seriously, but not all Christians take the bible literally.

Most religions fail in their first couple of years. If you talked to someone 6000 years ago about the big bang and evolution, and went into detail about them like the bible doesn't they would think you were crazy. But the way the Bible does describe evolution and the big bang is comprehendible by this same person.

Basically if the Bible had been a science text book instead of what we know it as Judaism and Christianity would not have existed.

...

And on the earth being suspended in one place, or whatever, see relativity.
 
300 posts is the OT limit, you can start a new thread if you care to continue this topic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom