It's not quite 25% but your point is well made, that a substantial reduction in the minority population is noteworthy for our purposes. Especially given how dependent Hillary has been on the minority vote, and even more especially given the reliably Democratic status of the black vote combined with the reliably split white vote creating a dynamic where the black vote is essentially doubled vis-à-vis the state percentage in the Democratic primary.A 25% reduction in the prevalence of a minority is a pretty big deal in demographic terms. No, you were talking about the city of Asheville. He was talking about Buncombe County. You do realize that a lot of those county residents commute to work in the city, right? In terms of what you observe on a daily basis when you walk around town, the county numbers do matter, especially given that the portion of the county outside the city has twice the residents of the city.
I also missed that he mentioned the county, thanks. I guess its fair to say he was talking about both. However, I will add that your perception of the city being lily-white was in-error, regardless of whether it was justified.
The last point, and ultimately, to your point, the most important, possibly is whether NC delegates are awarded based on the number of counties won or on a percentage basis based on the overall state percentages. If it is the former, then again, you are right that the county percentage of blacks is of paramount importance. If it is the latter, however, this discussion is purely academic. I honestly don't know the answer.