The Dutch gay HIV rape gang trial

Why is revenge always bad? Some people do things so evil that revenge is a good course.

The purpose of the justice system is not revenge, but justice, two entirely different things. Revenge has no place in the courts.
 
Revenge is not justice.
And we have a justice system precisely because revenge does not work.

Can't revenge and justice have the same outcome? Why are the exclusive?
 
Rape is rape, no matter what the sexual orientation of the victim and the perpitrator. Also, if one knows that he or she has HIV and just has sex without protection, it's like using a deadly weapon.
 
Extended, yes. But it is still a death sentence. In 15 years, when one of the men has died, I hope he can be recharged.

I suspect that in 15 years, we'll have a solid cure for HIV.

Guess who I nominate to be a member of every single clinical trial (for HIV) until then?
 
Because people who want revenge are going to maim and torture people in an irrational way, while justice will try to make sure that the accused are guilty, and will provide barbaric sentences.

But lets say they are found guilty why does it matter if some one gets revenge when in the end justice for the greater community is served. People like this don't deserve anything short of being wholly eliminated from the world. Does it really mater if they suffer or how much. Personally I'd lock them in a room with a dull knife and no food. And I'd expect the same for me if I ever did something this evil.
 
But lets say they are found guilty why does it matter if some one gets revenge when in the end justice for the greater community is served. People like this don't deserve anything short of being wholly eliminated from the world. Does it really mater if they suffer or how much. Personally I'd lock them in a room with a dull knife and no food. And I'd expect the same for me if I ever did something this evil.

But you're acting on emotions: anger, hate, passion... Justice acts on reason.

It matters a whole lot because if we say revenge is the way to go we're no better than the criminals since we're doing the exact same thing we've condemned them for.
 
But you're acting on emotions: anger, hate, passion... Justice acts on reason.

It matters a whole lot because if we say revenge is the way to go we're no better than the criminals since we're doing the exact same thing we've condemned them for.

No its not the same. What crime did these victims commit to be intentionally infected with a highly deadly and contagious illness?

Justice finds them guilty or not, vengeance sees to it they are punished.
 
But you're acting on emotions: anger, hate, passion... Justice acts on reason.

It matters a whole lot because if we say revenge is the way to go we're no better than the criminals since we're doing the exact same thing we've condemned them for.

An eye for an eye is not justice? Seems to me like ultimate justice.

As they say, "Let the punishment fit the crime"
 
And letting the victims pay for the medication and housing of their rapists is justice?

mmmh you're doing that emotional thing again. That's not justice.

No its not the same. What crime did these victims commit to be intentionally infected with a highly deadly and contagious illness?

Justice finds them guilty or not, vengeance sees to it they are punished.

Vengeance is much more likely to start a family feud than anything else.
 
An eye for an eye is not justice? Seems to me like ultimate justice.

As they say, "Let the punishment fit the crime"

Oh, yeah. What happens if the guy who killed one of your eyes had only one valid eye because of a genetic defect?
An eye for an eye will make him blind, while you will still be able to see.

Now what?
 
Not enough, life sentence is only 25 years. Make it a triple life sentence.

yeah agreed, that's what I was thinking about.

Hmm from many of these posts I get the impression that the judical system of western democracies seems to be quite unpopular.

I don't really see why though..
 
Top Bottom