The Holy Roman Empire is neither Holy, nor Roman, nor an Empire. Discuss!

What do you think of HRE?

  • It's great! I'm glad they finally got some respect!

    Votes: 65 18.7%
  • Eh, it's ok. Not my first choice, but I don't mind.

    Votes: 145 41.7%
  • I wish they had done a different Civ.

    Votes: 89 25.6%
  • I hate it. I hate it. I hate it!

    Votes: 49 14.1%

  • Total voters
    348
Status
Not open for further replies.

ChrTh

Happy Yule!
Joined
Oct 13, 2001
Messages
6,255
Location
Piedmont Triad, North Carolina
Firaxis drops a bombshell in the chat: Holy Roman Empire is in BTS with Charlemagne as a leader.

The question is: Good move, bad move, or meh?
 
The thread title is a nice little quote that history teachers like to say, but it was a lie. What killed the Holy Roman Empire was the Protestant reformation. Before Luther, the HRE was probably the dominant power of Europe. It was Holy Roman in that it served the Catholic Church, and it was an empire in that they conquered outward from central Europe.
 
The title says it all: The "Holy Roman Empire" was neither Holy nor Roman. (It was an Empire, though.)

Of course, this may not have any bearing on if it should be included. It still was an important institution in its own right. However, I was always under the impression that it was "covered" by France and Germany. We'll just have to see how it looks in-game.
 
This would be similar to adding the abbasid caliphate although I would enjoy it if they did that very much...
 
Are you saying Voltaire and/or Linda Richman would lie to me?!?! I'm verklempt!
 
Voltaire lived two hundred years after the Protestant reformation, which was the declining period of the HRE. Then it was true; they were half Protestant, so "Holy Roman" doesn't make sense, and they were quickly losing territory as an "empire."

But remember, just because the HRE sucked for its last three hundred years doesn't diminish its glorious age from 800 to 1500.
 
I can live with them being in, but I'm a bit dissapointed. We already have around a dozen European civs, and the HRE could effectively be represented by Germany. A more unique civ would have been a much better choice then HRE.
 
I dunno really. My first reaction was shocked, but I guess I can live with it. I know many people have wanted Charlemagne in the game (and rightly so) and this is a much better way to introduce him than just making him a French leader.
 
I do agree, though. You could cram the HRE into Germany; obviously they had no problems with that before, as Frederick was part of the German civ. Really, Israel and Italy would have been so much more appropriate.

I know many people have wanted Charlemagne in the game (and rightly so) and this is a much better way to introduce him than just making him a French leader.

Once more, he would've been part of Germany. Anybody arguing he should've been part of France is grasping at straws.
 
I do agree, though. You could cram the HRE into Germany; obviously they had no problems with that before, as Frederick was part of the German civ. Really, Israel and Italy would have been so much more appropriate.

Well, Frederick should be part of the German civ, as he founded the core for the modern Germany. He never lead the HRE, which was firmly in the hand of the Austrians at that time (Anyway, it didn't mean anything but a title anymore).
 
For what it's worth, some info in the HRE. I only hope it's right (it's from "Wiki-junkia" :p).

The Holy Roman Empire (Latin Sacrum Romanum Imperium) was a mainly Germanic conglomeration of lands in Central Europe during the Middle Ages and the early modern period. It was also known as the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation from the late 15th century onwards.

It originated with the coronation of Charlemagne by Pope Leo III on Christmas Day, AD 800, and lasted until the abdication of Emperor Francis II in 1806 during the Napoleonic Wars. After the partition of the Frankish Empire by the Treaty of Verdun in 843, the de facto sovereignty of the Emperors became confined first to the central and later (and for most of the Empire's subsequent history) to the eastern portion of the former Frankish dominions.

At its post-Carolingian peak, the Holy Roman Empire encompassed the territories of present-day Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Czech Republic, Slovenia, Belgium, and the Netherlands as well as large parts of modern Poland, France and Italy. At the time of its dissolution it consisted of its core German territories including Austria, the Czech Republic, and Slovenia, and smaller parts of Italy, Poland, and Croatia.

The Holy Roman Empire was a conscious attempt to resurrect the Western Roman Empire, considered to have ended with the abdication of Romulus Augustulus in 476. Although Pope Leo III crowned Charlemagne as Imperator Augustus on 25 December 800, and his son, Louis the Pious was also crowned as Emperor by the Pope, the Empire and the imperial office did not become formalized for some decades, due largely to the Frankish tendency to divide realms between heirs after a ruler's death. It is notable that Louis first crowned himself in 814, upon his father's death, but in 816, Pope Stephen V, who had succeeded Leo III, visited Rheims and again crowned Louis. By that act, the Emperor strengthened the papacy by recognising the importance of the pope in imperial coronations.

After the end of the Napoleonic Wars a new German union was established in 1815. It lasted until 1866 when Prussia dissolved the German Confederation to form the North German Confederation which became a nation state in 1871 (see German Empire). The Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation was also known as the Old Empire (First Reich) while the new empire was known as the New Empire, second Empire, or Second Reich.

It has been said that modern history of Germany was primarily predetermined by three factors: the Reich, the Reformation, and the later dualism between Austria and Prussia.
 
i do not think the HRE is a good choice because its pretty much combining the Germans and French. which is stupid. since we already have both of them.

WOOHOO FIRST POST
 
Seems like the only reason they're doing this is because they want the Charlemagne leader for the scenario, and- as has been pointed out- it would be disputed about whether he belongs in France or Germany. Hell, even Austria would be better than this.
 
Charlemagne ! Charlemagne! Charlemagne!. Yes it is a good idea.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom