1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

[RD] The Israel/Palestine Quarantine Thread

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by Arakhor, Nov 20, 2018.

  1. Arakhor

    Arakhor Dremora Courtier Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Messages:
    29,943
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    Moderator Action: From now on, any and all discussion about the Israel-Palestine situation will be conducted in this thread and this thread alone. Furthermore, in an attention to encourage discussion that doesn't immediately boil down to the lowest common denominator, this thread has been tagged as RD.
     
  2. brennan

    brennan Argumentative Brit

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8,684
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Worthing, Southern England
    I was wondering last week why nobody mentioned the recent escalation, which pretty much represented the normal state of affairs:

    Israel launches armed assault on Palestinian territory; rocket fire ensues; Israelis claim they have to 'defend themselves' and go completely OTT.

    Some reminders:

    1) Occupying powers have no right to self defence, they are always the aggressor by definition, simply by the fact of their presence.

    2) Occupying powers are obliged under UN treaty to assist occupied peoples in seeking self-determination (Israel does every last thing within its power to prevent this.)

    3) Blowing up civilian targets whenever there is allegedly a 'terrorist' present is a war crime unless the specific military gain outweighs the risk to civilian life and infrastructure (the IDF fails this standard at every turn).

    4) Hamas are in point of fact a government within Gaza, and IDF targetted actions against their officials are both terrorism and illegal acts of aggression against a neighbour.

    Feel free to assume that I don't think the sun shines out of Hamas' collective backsides as well btw.
     
  3. rah

    rah Warlord Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    4,769
    Location:
    Chicago
    So what is the path to peace. I firmly believe that Israel would lose whatever little of their remaining high ground if Hamas would just renounce it's mission, and stopped firing missiles. Everyone agree that they don't really do much. I would think the Media is a much better weapon at this point.
     
  4. Timsup2nothin

    Timsup2nothin Another drone in the hive mind

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2013
    Messages:
    31,936
    Location:
    Perhaps in transit
    Please point to any time that the media generated sufficient international restraints being put on Israel to stop their expansion into additional territories.
     
  5. brennan

    brennan Argumentative Brit

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8,684
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Worthing, Southern England
    Watch a Norman Finkelstein video.

    - Israel must agree to non-stupid mutual land swaps (Palestine must be a contiguous territory in the West Bank and with some sort of easy access to Gaza, Israel cannot simply claim every piece of freshwater, some settlements will have to go etc.)
    - Palestinians must recognise that any recognition of the 'right to return' cannot include actual return, since this would result in the destruction of the state of Israel overnight.

    I think there's a few more, but those are the basics.
     
  6. rah

    rah Warlord Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    4,769
    Location:
    Chicago
    I think if you take away their victim card, they're likely to lose some support in the US. They'd certainly lose mine and I'm sure I'm pretty common in that regard. They lose support here and they have to respond.


    xpost, @brennan I would stand behind those after Hamas denounced there mission.
     
  7. Mouthwash

    Mouthwash Escaped Lunatic

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2011
    Messages:
    7,887
    Location:
    Hiding
    It is my opinion that every analysis I have ever seen of the wars in Gaza (2009, 2012, and 2014) is basically fraudulent, regardless of which side it supported. This is because all of them frame the conflicts in terms of visible damage, i.e. the actual death toll/destruction on both sides, and not the potential damage. I have never seen an analysis of what Hamas could do if their missile launches were not immediately followed by Israeli airstrikes, as it is a constraining factor for both accuracy and quantity (the Iron Dome can be saturated by the launching of dozens of rockets at the same location - furthermore, it is literally a hundred times more expensive for the Iron Dome to counter those missiles then for Hamas to build and launch them).

    If Hamas were allowed to freely target Israel, they would arguably be able to kill hundreds or even thousands of civilians; if Israel built enough shelters to prevent this, Hamas would still be able to shut down the entire south of the country indefinitely. Even without the threat of a possible simultaneous war with Hezbollah, Israel is under tremendous pressure to finish a conflict quickly.

    It is also my opinion that those who do not understand this should not be taken seriously on any political matter, since a useful understanding of politics requires more than first-order reasoning. If you're reading this right now and didn't think of it before, some introspection may be in order.

    This is not the case (it would not even apply here, since the attacks are being made onto Israeli soil). I'm not even going into how questionable Gaza's status as occupied is.

    The military gain is general, not specific (i.e. it removes any opportunity for Hamas to take advantage of the fact that countering their attacks requires more resources on Israel's part, and shows them that they cannot organize larger-scale attacks). If that is illegal, then frankly so are most tactics in warfare.

    Are you also willing to apply this standard to ISIS, which at one point governed over forty thousand square miles?
     
  8. Timsup2nothin

    Timsup2nothin Another drone in the hive mind

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2013
    Messages:
    31,936
    Location:
    Perhaps in transit
    Do you think there is really any way to "take away their victim card?" Stop firing rockets and they will still be saying "we live in fear." The choice of whether to accept their playing of the card remains.
     
  9. brennan

    brennan Argumentative Brit

    Joined:
    May 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8,684
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Worthing, Southern England
    Fatuous, they fire literally thousands of the things and do little more than scare pets.

    @Mouthwash, now that is Whataboutism. And who elected ISIS?
     
  10. rah

    rah Warlord Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    4,769
    Location:
    Chicago
    As long as Hama's mission is their destruction, I have no problem believing the "we live in fear" POV.
    Which is why I keep harping on it.
    Growing up in the 60, my first impressions were they were the victims, so that does color my opinion a touch.
     
  11. Timsup2nothin

    Timsup2nothin Another drone in the hive mind

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2013
    Messages:
    31,936
    Location:
    Perhaps in transit
    Is there a government, anywhere, that doesn't at least quietly acknowledge that life would be easier if that pesky neighboring country just ceased to exist?
     
  12. rah

    rah Warlord Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2005
    Messages:
    4,769
    Location:
    Chicago
    Yeah, but most are diplomatic enough to not put it on paper and yell it from the rooftops whenever they get the chance.
    It has to be the starting point. You have to at least pretend you want peace before you can actually discuss it.
     
  13. Snerk

    Snerk Smeghead

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,991
    Location:
    Norway. You'll never leave
    Hasn't Hamas long since denounced that 1987 manifest or whatever it was called, the one that had that bit about working for the destruction of Israel? Not saying they're peaceful or rational but they did propose a 10 year ceasefire with Israel fire but on deaf ears.
     
    Last edited: Nov 20, 2018
  14. Timsup2nothin

    Timsup2nothin Another drone in the hive mind

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2013
    Messages:
    31,936
    Location:
    Perhaps in transit
    Nominally. However, when there is already disputed land there isn't much gained by pretending anyone will just "let it go." I don't even know the current status of Alsace and Lorraine, but every time I see a prospective "no more NATO forcing peace on Germany and France" I assume there will be another war over them in fairly short order. With basically every square inch of Israel representing displacement of Palestinians within fairly recent memory there is a far bigger obstacle to overcome than some angry rhetoric by the dispossessed.
     
  15. Mouthwash

    Mouthwash Escaped Lunatic

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2011
    Messages:
    7,887
    Location:
    Hiding
    It's clear now that regardless of the tag, no Israel-Palestine discussion on CFC will be even minimally productive. I'm going to go ahead and unsubscribe. Enjoy the thread.
     
  16. Timsup2nothin

    Timsup2nothin Another drone in the hive mind

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2013
    Messages:
    31,936
    Location:
    Perhaps in transit
    Bye. Don't let the door hit ya where the good lord split ya.

    I'm guessing here, but I think Mouthwash defines "productive" as "agreement reached that Israel has a moral right to commit any atrocity that crosses the collective mind of its government," and I for one am very happy that such a "productive" discussion never happens here.
     
  17. Arakhor

    Arakhor Dremora Courtier Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 27, 2009
    Messages:
    29,943
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    UK
    Moderator Action: To paraphrase Hotel California, you can check out any time you like, but if you want to mention the thread topic in any fashion, you can never leave.
     
    cardgame and Timsup2nothin like this.
  18. Estebonrober

    Estebonrober Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2017
    Messages:
    371
    Gender:
    Male
    Wait I wanted your take on this insane take!? Dang it.

    Israel should remove all Palestinians from whatever land they want to go ahead and take. Then they should pay out 4% of GDP to Jordan and whoever else has to deal with the mass migration problem for 99 years. Afterwards Israel will forever be a pariah but they are that already. This slow motion genocide? is terrible to witness and has long since numbed my mind.
     
  19. Timsup2nothin

    Timsup2nothin Another drone in the hive mind

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2013
    Messages:
    31,936
    Location:
    Perhaps in transit
    4% of GDP is gross undervaluing.
     
  20. Estebonrober

    Estebonrober Chieftain

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2017
    Messages:
    371
    Gender:
    Male
    Yea maybe 10? I mean the problem is quibbling over money when the inevitable death toll is so terrible anyways.

    Idk. My hopelessness for the situation is betrayed by my proposal. It just seems we have a conquering taking place in super slow motion. If they are going to do it just finish it already.

    Although this also leads me to play this out and it still doesn't change much for the rest of the world. Israel will still play the cornered lion, US evangelicals will still let the play havoc with our foreign policy, and Arabs will still want the erasure of the "Zionist Entity".
     

Share This Page