Link to Tweet. Direct link to article (+972 Magazine). -------------- I was on mobile (still am), so the above was a bit brief. I've got a bit more time now so I wanted to explain why this is important (mainly at @Absolution, but I'm in no way demanding you reply. Simply for your benefit). Allegedly the army didn't instigate / escalate here, but they were present and did act in defense of the settlers' reported actions. If true, this either means that the army is complicit in protecting settler actions on Palestinian land, or the army doesn't have control over elements that behave in this way.