So, as I said before, let's hand over the planet tothe Sinaloa cartelLos Zetas and make sure we get enough money off them to terraform Mars.
Los Zetas rule, Sinaloas drool!

So, as I said before, let's hand over the planet tothe Sinaloa cartelLos Zetas and make sure we get enough money off them to terraform Mars.
Plus tax avoidance where it's legal is a ton different from refusing to pay taxes. Look at how like half of US corporations are incorporated in Delaware.
Anyone who thinks this leak is going to be the catalyst for any kind of real change.
So what should we do until we find a new way to do things? We shouldn't apply imperfect solutions until we find the perfect one?I would say aside from. All previous methods to enact change have failed because they treat symptoms, not the actual problem itself. Hell, I would even go so far as to say some methods tried in the past are actually part of the problem (looking at you, revolutions).
So what should we do until we find a new way to do things? We shouldn't apply imperfect solutions until we find the perfect one?
I wouldn't be surprised if the unrolling scandal over the coming months has quite a strong influence on the Australian elections, too, since the prime minister is a rich businessman known to have accounts in the Caymans, and is currently trying to make union corruption an issue while tax reform is already a significant one. The focus this brings on business corruption is erm, not welcome to the Liberals.
Your earlier posts sounded even more defeatist than that one.Oh no, by all means, apply the imperfect solutions. Just don't be surprised or angry when those imperfect solutions don't change anything.
after the Wikileaks which you know started the Arab Spring
If I "know" this, I must be badly misinformed.
And if you believe in the purity of intentions of the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ) at the center of the leak, Ive got a made in Shenzhen Panama hat to sell you (disclosure: I never was, and never will be, a member of the ICIJ).
The Washington-based ICIJ gets its cash and its "organizational procedure" via the Exceptionalistan-based, Orwellian-named Center for Public Integrity. The funds flow mostly from the Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Endowment, the Rockefeller Family Fund, the Kellogg Foundation and the George Soros-owned Open Society.
Then there is Eastern Europe-based partner organization OCCRP, an even more Orwellian outfit self-styled as playing some sort of progressive, alternative media role. OCCRP is funded by Soros and USAID.
And finally theres this fictional land named Panama a certified U.S. vassal. Absolutely nothing of real substance happens in Panama without a green light by the United States government. Or, as an international tax lawyer told me, you have to be an idiot to stash money in Panama. You cannot flush a toilet there without the Americans knowing about it.
This sets the scene for the Panama Papers leak a massive hoard of 11.5 million documents allegedly leaked from someone inside offshore heavies Mossack Fonseca to the center-left, NATO-friendly Suddeutsche Zeitung newspaper in Munich and then shared by the ICIJ with selected mainstream media partners.
The Washington-based ICIJ gets its cash and its "organizational procedure" via the Exceptionalistan-based, Orwellian-named Center for Public Integrity. The funds flow mostly from the Ford Foundation, the Carnegie Endowment, the Rockefeller Family Fund, the Kellogg Foundation and the George Soros-owned Open Society.
Oops ReindeerThistle, you overlooked the vast majority of its scores of institutional supporters and its hundreds of individual supporters.
the fact that George Soros is behind this should be cause for pause.
That's not for tax purposes; it's because Delaware grants the most immunity for directors who screw up.