The Secret Border Patrol Facebook Group Where Agents Joke About Migrant Deaths and Post Sexist Memes

Cutlass

The Man Who Wasn't There.
Joined
Jan 13, 2008
Messages
48,165
Location
US of A
Inside the Secret Border Patrol Facebook Group Where Agents Joke About Migrant Deaths and Post Sexist Memes


The three-year-old group, which has roughly 9,500 members, shared derogatory comments about Latina lawmakers who plan to visit a controversial Texas detention facility on Monday, calling them “scum buckets” and “hoes.”

by A.C. Thompson

July 1, 10:55 a.m. EDT


by A.C. Thompson

July 1, 10:55 a.m. EDT
ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of power. Sign up for ProPublica’s Big Story newsletter to receive stories like this one in your inbox as soon as they are published.

Members of a secret Facebook group for current and former Border Patrol agents joked about the deaths of migrants, discussed throwing burritos at Latino members of Congress visiting a detention facility in Texas on Monday and posted a vulgar illustration depicting Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez engaged in oral sex with a detained migrant, according to screenshots of their postings.

In one exchange, group members responded with indifference and wisecracks to the post of a news story about a 16-year-old Guatemalan migrant who died in May while in custody at a Border Patrol station in Weslaco, Texas. One member posted a GIF of Elmo with the quote, “Oh well.” Another responded with an image and the words “If he dies, he dies.”

Created in August 2016, the Facebook group is called “I’m 10-15” and boasts roughly 9,500 members from across the country. (10-15 is Border Patrol code for “aliens in custody.”) The group described itself, in an online introduction, as a forum for “funny” and “serious” discussion about work with the patrol. “Remember you are never alone in this family,” the introduction said.

A screenshot from the Facebook group, run with this text: “That's right *****es. The masses have spoken and today democracy won. I have returned. To everyone who knows the real me and had my back I say thank you. To everyone else? This is what I have to say.....”
Responsible for policing the nation’s southern and northern boundaries, the Border Patrol has come under intense scrutiny as the Trump administration takes new, more aggressive measures to halt the influx of undocumented migrants across the United States-Mexico border. The patrol’s approximately 20,000 agents serve under the broader U.S. Customs and Border Protection agency, which has been faulted for allegedly mistreating children and adults in its custody. The agency’s leadership has been in turmoil, with its most recent acting chief, John Sanders, resigning last week.

ProPublica received images of several recent discussions in the 10-15 Facebook group and was able to link the participants in those online conversations to apparently legitimate Facebook profiles belonging to Border Patrol agents, including a supervisor based in El Paso, Texas, and an agent in Eagle Pass, Texas. ProPublica has so far been unable to reach the group members who made the postings.

ProPublica contacted three spokespeople for CBP in regard to the Facebook group and provided the names of three agents who appear to have participated in the online chats. CBP hasn’t yet responded.

“These comments and memes are extremely troubling,” said Daniel Martinez, a sociologist at the University of Arizona in Tucson who studies the border. “They’re clearly xenophobic and sexist.”

The postings, in his view, reflect what “seems to be a pervasive culture of cruelty aimed at immigrants within CBP. This isn’t just a few rogue agents or ‘bad apples.’”

The Border Patrol Facebook group is the most recent example of some law enforcement personnel behaving badly in public and private digital spaces. An investigation by Reveal uncovered hundreds of active-duty and retired law enforcement officers who moved in extremist Facebook circles, including white supremacist and anti-government groups. A team of researchers calling themselves the Plain View Project recently released a hefty database of offensive Facebook posts made by current and ex-law enforcement officers.

And in early 2018, federal investigators found a raft of disturbing and racist text messages sent by Border Patrol agents in southern Arizona after searching the phone of Matthew Bowen, an agent charged with running down a Guatemalan migrant with a Ford F-150 pickup truck. The texts, which were revealed in a court filing in federal court in Tucson, described migrants as “guats,” “wild ass horsehockybags,” “beaners” and “subhuman.” The messages included repeated discussions about burning the migrants up.

Several of the postings reviewed by ProPublica refer to the planned visit by members of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, including Ocasio-Cortez and Rep. Veronica Escobar, to a troubled Border Patrol facility outside of El Paso. Agents at the compound in Clint, Texas, have been accused of holding children in neglectful, inhumane conditions.

Members of the Border Patrol Facebook group were not enthused about the tour, noting that Ocasio-Cortez, a Democrat from Queens, had compared Border Patrol facilities to Nazi concentration camps. Escobar is a freshman Democrat representing El Paso.

One member encouraged Border Patrol agents to hurl a “burrito at these *****es.” Another, apparently a patrol supervisor, wrote, “fudge the hoes.” “There should be no photo ops for these scum buckets,” posted a third member.

Perhaps the most disturbing posts target Ocasio-Cortez. One includes a photo illustration of her engaged in oral sex at an immigrant detention center. Text accompanying the image reads, “Lucky Illegal Immigrant Glory Hole Special Starring AOC.”

Another is a photo illustration of a smiling President Donald Trump forcing Ocasio-Cortez’s head toward his crotch. The agent who posted the image commented: “That’s right *****es. The masses have spoken and today democracy won.”

The posts about Escobar and Ocasio-Cortez are “vile and sexist,” said a staffer for Escobar. “Furthermore, the comments made by Border Patrol agents towards immigrants, especially those that have lost their lives, are disgusting and show a complete disregard for human life and dignity.”

The head of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, Joaquin Castro, reviewed the Facebook discussions and was incensed. “It confirms some of the worst criticisms of Customs and Border Protection,” said Castro, a Democrat who represents San Antonio. “These are clearly agents who are desensitized to the point of being dangerous to migrants and their co-workers.” He added that the agents who made the vulgar comments “don’t deserve to wear any uniform representing the United States of America.”

Vicki Gaubeca, director of the Southern Border Communities Coalition, said the postings are more evidence of the sexism and misogyny that has long plagued the Border Patrol. “That’s why they’re the worst at recruiting women,” said Gaubeca, whose group works to reform the agency. “They have the lowest percentage of female agents or officers of any federal law enforcement agency.”

In another thread, a group member posted a photo of father and his 23-month-old daughter lying face down in the Rio Grande. The pair drowned while trying to ford the river and cross into the U.S.; pictures of the two have circulated widely online in recent days, generating an outcry.

The member asked if the photo could have been faked because the bodies were so “clean.” (The picture was taken by an Associated Press photographer, and there is no indication that it was staged or manipulated.) “I HAVE NEVER SEEN FLOATERS LIKE THIS,” the person wrote, adding, “could this be another edited photo. We’ve all seen the dems and liberal parties do some pretty sick things…”

https://www.propublica.org/article/...s-joke-about-migrant-deaths-post-sexist-memes


OK, can we call them fascists and traitors now?
 
I am shocked, shocked I say!
The very idea that people who throw kids in cages without soap might be vulgar, bigoted, pigs is shocking!
 
Maybe these people were destroying water supplies out of spite and not to deter desert traffic, but I dont know how many are involved. The article suggests maybe a dozen or so people responsible for the messages if that.
 
This one is peculiar. When I saw this one I was expecting it to blow up and be a big and long-time running story. But it’s like a small and now disappeared notice on page 14. It’s quite a remarkable breach of human rights to first detain and then abuse refugees in concentration camp like environments. These people are innocent and not charged with anything. But we live in a new age where it’s OK for people of power to abuse and exploit people in tough or vulnerable situations. It’s a tenet of modern capitalism after all – no matter how much liberals spin it.
 
This one is peculiar. When I saw this one I was expecting it to blow up and be a big and long-time running story. But it’s like a small and now disappeared notice on page 14. It’s quite a remarkable breach of human rights to first detain and then abuse refugees in concentration camp like environments. These people are innocent and not charged with anything. But we live in a new age where it’s OK for people of power to abuse and exploit people in tough or vulnerable situations. It’s a tenet of modern capitalism after all – no matter how much liberals spin it.

No Democrat is talking about holding officials or agents accountable for these crimes.
 
I dont understand why these detention centers weren't built to accommodate large numbers of people.
Someone was on the radio this morning, putting it all on insufficient funding. I forget who it was, but he pretty much blamed Congress for everything.
 
Someone was on the radio this morning, putting it all on insufficient funding. I forget who it was, but he pretty much blamed Congress for everything.

Well it kinda is all Congress's fault. Border Patrol has been asking for more funding for years and Congress hasn't given it to them.
 
Illegal immigration has bipartisan support, Dems and Repubs have their motives but both have reason to make sure we're not too effective at controlling the border.
 
Illegal immigration has bipartisan support, Dems and Repubs have their motives but both have reason to make sure we're not too effective at controlling the border.

Agreed, which is why I said "Congress" and not "Democrats".
 
You guys are still new at this but: the cruelty is the point

Much agreed. This is why **** like this needs to make bigger headlines. History will not judge this kindly.
 
Someone was on the radio this morning, putting it all on insufficient funding. I forget who it was, but he pretty much blamed Congress for everything.
Funding isn't the root cause of all this. The root cause is extremely overzealous enforcement of immigration laws and round-up of suspected immigrants. There was not a border crisis until this administration decided to create one out of thin air. They're grabbing people outside of schools and churches for god's sake and now people from terrible countries are rushing the border in hopes they can get across before we actually start executing immigrants or whatever comes next for this horror show of an administration. They're also actively denying asylum applications and just locking people up that we used to let come into the country and have asylum hearings.

Saying there isn't enough funding to put people in concentration camps is ridiculous because our immigration system was not set up to be run like this.
 
Well it kinda is all Congress's fault. Border Patrol has been asking for more funding for years and Congress hasn't given it to them.



The administration controls how the money available is spent. And they have not spent it in the ways Congress said to do so. Only the administration and involved agencies are responsible for this.
 
OK, can we call them fascists and traitors now?
Yes.
extremely overzealous enforcement of immigration laws
Apparently, 3.2% of people in US, or roughly 1 in 30, are there illegally.
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/06/12/5-facts-about-illegal-immigration-in-the-u-s/
That does not suggest "overzealous enforcement", rather it suggests ineffective enforcement (albeit one might argue these two are not necessarily mutually exclusive).
Might suggest overzealous laws though.
 
The administration controls how the money available is spent. And they have not spent it in the ways Congress said to do so. Only the administration and involved agencies are responsible for this.

Bingo. With Trump saying that any money allocated anywhere for any purpose can be redirected according to his whims how can anyone blame congress for not funding some particular thing?
 
Yes.

Apparently, 3.2% of people in US, or roughly 1 in 30, are there illegally.
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/06/12/5-facts-about-illegal-immigration-in-the-u-s/
That does not suggest "overzealous enforcement", rather it suggests ineffective enforcement (albeit one might argue these two are not necessarily mutually exclusive).
Might suggest overzealous laws though.


Thing about the illegal immigrant numbers is that this mostly represents intentional policy. The government willfully turned a blind eye to illegal immigration for 20 years. Because everyone wanted the cheap labor. It's only with resurgent racism that the 'problem' has become """THE PROBLEM!!!""" .
 
No Democrat is talking about holding officials or agents accountable for these crimes.

The crime of mem(e)ing?

To be fair I'd call these sackable offences for the individuals, and possibly justification for implementing some sort of independent overview of the organisation as a whole if it's widespread.
 
Top Bottom