Lexicus
Deity
(I do remember you arguing that revenue-based subsidies weren't a good option because it would benefit white people more than black people).
Quote me.
I mean, we have plenty of people you consider racist that would also mock a racist tweet. Does that convince you they aren't ?
It isn't about "racism". That tweet is a distilled statement of what I understand to be identity fundamentalism. It takes one aspect of society, race, and attempts to use that to explain everything. That is what I don't agree with, the view that you are ascribing to me.
Actually, from where I'm standing, your politics look STRONGLY anti-white-man and just marginally anti-capitalist. You look MUCH more obsessed with racial militantism than with class injustice (I do remember you arguing that revenue-based subsidies weren't a good option because it would benefit white people more than black people).
You probably just don't read the majority of my posts. We usually butt heads over these "cultural" issues and that gives you a skewed view of my general outlook.
I believe you are confusing me with metalhead or someone else on revenue-based subsidies. I said that affirmative action based on income/wealth alone will not address racial disparities in college admissions, housing, or the job market. Generally speaking I am opposed to means-tested social programs because I believe universal, unconditional benefits are both morally superior and politically easier (they also save on administration!).
And no, I don't think you explicitely said "we should take revenge on the cis-white-het men", but that's just a strawman. My point is that your tone, the way you mock arguments or people when the subject come, the accusations you throw and so on betray a deep scorn and disgust toward white-cis-het males on the whole, and you consider that if they take a blow as a group, it's deserved.
I have made no secret of my desire for revenge on the people who subjected my country to Trump. But that isn't "white people," it's "Trump voters."