1. We have added the ability to collapse/expand forum categories and widgets on forum home.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Photobucket has changed its policy concerning hotlinking images and now requires an account with a $399.00 annual fee to allow hotlink. More information is available at: this link.
    Dismiss Notice
  3. All Civ avatars are brought back and available for selection in the Avatar Gallery! There are 945 avatars total.
    Dismiss Notice
  4. To make the site more secure, we have installed SSL certificates and enabled HTTPS for both the main site and forums.
    Dismiss Notice
  5. Civ6 is released! Order now! (Amazon US | Amazon UK | Amazon CA | Amazon DE | Amazon FR)
    Dismiss Notice
  6. Dismiss Notice
  7. Forum account upgrades are available for ad-free browsing.
    Dismiss Notice

The Seventh Term Supreme Court

Discussion in 'Civ4 - Demo Game II: Offices' started by Nobody, Aug 31, 2007.

  1. Nobody

    Nobody Gangster

    Sep 14, 2001
    Wellington New Zealand
    You are about to enter the courtroom of Judge Nobody. The people are real... the cases are real... the rulings are final. This is .........

    The Seventh Term Supreme Court

    Chief Justice :
    Judge Advocate: Methos
    Public Defender: Donsig

    Useful Links:
    Link to the term 6 Courthouse
    The Law Library

    Judaical Procedures

    Spoiler :

    Rights and Duties of all Citizens
    • Participate in all Judicial discussions
    • Request that any Judicial discussion be moved to its own thread in the Citizen's forum
    • Post requests for Judicial Review of existing law.
    • Post requests for Judicial Review of proposed amendments. This request should contain the exact text to be reviewed and a link to the discussion thread.
    • Post requests for clarification. This is an unofficial question about the rules that does not create a finding or set legal precedent, but may lead to a Judicial Review if any Justice feels one is needed.
    • Post requests for Investigations. This is a request to determine if a citizen has violated a rule. This request must be posted in the Judicial thread. There are no anonymous requests.
    Shared duties and responsibilities of all Justices
    • Conduct the business of the court in a fair, impartial, open and speedy manner.
    • Review and discuss any questions about our laws.
    • Review all proposed Amendments to our laws.
    • Review all requested Investigations to determine if there is need.
    • Participate in all Investigations in a fair and impartial manner.
    • Post clear opinions on all questions.
    • Notify the Judiciary during any Absence, and arrange for a Pro-Tem replacement
    • Discuss and ratify these Judicial Procedures.
    • Recuse themself from the portion of any Investigation where they feel their court position is in conflict with their interest in the case, for example JA as accused or PD as accuser. A Pro-tem replacement will be named by the Chieftain.
    • Recuse themself from any Judicial Review where they feel unable to render a fair, impartial, open or speedy decision. A Pro-tem replacement will be named by the Chieftain.
    Rights and Duties of the Chief Justice
    • Post polls for amendments once they pass review
    • Oversee all Judicial Proceedings.
    • Maintain the Judicial Log.
    Rights and Duties of the Judge Advocate
    • Post any valid Recall poll if for the Chief Justice.
    • Serve as the Prosecution during any trial of a citizen. In this role, the Judge Advocate need not act impartial as they are arguing for a specific side.
    Rights and Duties of the Public Defender
    • Serve as the Defense during as trial of a citizen, unless requested otherwise by the citizen. In this role, the Public Defender need not act impartial as they are arguing for a specific side.
    Judicial Reviews
    Judicial Reviews are used to resolve questions of the law and to validate proposed amendments. The opinion of a majority of the Justices will be used to resolve the Judicial Review.

    Reviews of existing laws may be requested by anyone. The Judiciary shall review each request for merit. If any Justice determines the request has merit, it is accepted. The Chief Justice will post each accepted request, clearly denoting the questions for that Judiciary Review. After at least 24 hours, each Justice may post their finding. This post should clearly answer the questions as posed by the Chief Justice. The Chief Justice may request clarification of these findings as needed.

    The Chief Justice may, at his discretion, move discussion on a Judicial Review currently under consideration to a separate thread in the Citizen's Forum, in order to attract attention to an important discussion, or to insure clarity of discussion if multiple requests are simultaneously under review.

    The Chief Justice may also accept a request as one for a Temporary ruling. This process is for questions that may materially delay the Demogame, but would best be answered by an Initiative or Amendment. Once the ruling is made, the Chief Justice will open a discussion on creating an Initiative or Amendment. This ruling is in effect only until a relevant initiative is passed. Temporary rulings may, at the discretion of the Chief Justice, ignore the 24 hour rule above.

    Reviews of proposed amendments may be requested by anyone. The post must include the proposed amendment, and a link to the discussion thread. This post should clearly note all changes, including additions, deletions and changes. The proposed amendment must have been conspicuously posted as a proposed poll for at least 24 hours, and the discussion thread open for at least 48 hours. The Justices will review the amendment for any conflicts with current law, and post their findings. The Chief Justice will post the poll for all proposals that pass Judicial Review.


    Concurring decisions or rulings by at least two justices will resolve a judicial review. Any justice can request clarification of another justice's decision or ruling. Justices may also request the use alternative means of internal discussion to aid in their decisions. All rulings MUST, however, be posted in public, either in the Judicial thread or in designated Judicial Review discussion threads.

    Requests may be deferred to the next term if the Chief Justice deems it likely that the Judicial Review will not finish prior to the conclusion of the current term.

    Poll Invalidations
    Poll Invalidations are used to allow bad polls to be canceled. To invalidate a poll, any member of the Judiciary posts in the poll thread clearly stating that they are invalidating the poll and the reasons for the invalidation. This must happen within the time limits specified by law.

    If a poll is invalidated, any citizen may request an appeal of that invalidation. This request must be done through a post in the official Judiciary thread. Once an appeal has been made, the appeal will be handled as a Judicial Review, with the sole question being "Should the poll in question be invalidated?". If 2 or more Justices vote to accept the poll as valid, it is immediately considered valid and in force.

    Investigations are used to determine if a citizen has violated a rule. They may be requested by any citizen in a post in the Judicial thread. Except as noted, the Justices must act in a fair, impartial, open and speedy manner throughout the process. All citizens are innocent unless determined to be guilty. All evidence, except foreknowledge of the game, must be presented publicly. Evidence of foreknowledge of the game will be reviewed by the Judiciary, and a statement about that evidence posted. Once that evidence becomes irrelevant due to game progress, any citizen may request it to be posted.

    Any citizen who is the defendant of a Citizen Complaint has the right to representation throughout the process. The Public Defender will defend each citizen charged with an offense from the moment the Citizen Complaint is filed until the complaint is concluded, unless another citizen is appointed by the defendant to serve as the Defense, with that citizen's consent, or if the accused prefers to defend him/herself.

    At any time during a citizen complaint, the prosecution and the defense (and accused) may agree to drop the case and implement an alternative agreed to solution, provided the Chief Justice concurs. Likewise, the citizen making the request may drop the request, ending the citizen complaint unless another citizen wishes to continue the process. Likewise, the citizen under investigation may accept the charges, and move immediately to the Sentencing phase.

    If a citizen has been found innocent of a charge or if the citizen has been found guilty and sentenced appropriately, the citizen may not be charged again with the same violation.

    Each requested Investigation will be reviewed by the Judiciary. Justices will gather and look through the evidence presented, including requests for statements from all citizens. If all Justices posting decisions determine the request to have No Merit, the basis for that finding will be posted by each Justice and the request is denied. If at least one Justice determines the request to have Merit, a trial on the facts will be conducted. The Judge Advocate will review the request and the relevant law, and determine the specific law the accused citizen is alleged to have violated.

    The Judge Advocate will create a thread for the trial in the Citizen's forum. This initial post should contain the specific violations and the evidence for those accusations. The next two posts are reserved for the citizen accused and the Public Defender - until they post, or 24 hours from the initial post if they do not, no other citizen may post in the thread. All citizens are encouraged to post in this thread, but are reminded to respect the rights of all citizens.

    Once at least 48 hours have passed, and discussion has dwindled or reached a point where arguments are being repeated with no new information, the Chief Justice can declare the discussion closed, and post a Trial poll.

    The Trial poll will be a private poll, with the options Innocent, Guilty and Abstain. It will run for 48 hours. The option receiving the most votes will determine the result. In the event of a tie or Abstain receiving the most votes, the Trial is declared a mistrial, the accused continues to be assumed Innocent, but a new investigation may be started on the same charge within two weeks.

    If a citizen under an investigation has accepted the charges, the citizen, the accuser and the Judiciary may determine and assign a sentence if they all unanimously agree to the arrangement. Failure to uphold that arrangement will result in full sentencing poll posted as if the citizen were found guilty in a Trial.

    If an arrangement cannot be made, or the citizen was found Guilty in a trial poll, the sentence will be determined by the citizens through a poll. The Chief Justice will post the poll, marked as private with a duration of 48 hours. The options for the poll will include:
    Suspension from Demogame
    Removal from Office (if applicable)
    No Action
    Other options may be included through unanimous consent of the Judiciary.

    Once the poll closes, the Chief Justice or Judge Advocate will determine the sentence imposed using cumulative voting. The most severe option that a majority of citizens support will be imposed. If a Warning is issued, a warning will be posted by the Chief Justice in the Judicial thread, sent via PM to the citizen, and posted in that person’s government thread, if they hold an office. IIf the citizen is removed from office, they are barred from holding that office for the remainder of the term. The length of any suspension is to be determined by the moderators.

    Changes to Judicial Procedures
    The Judicial Procedures may be changed at any time by a concurring decision of at least two justices.

    The Docket:
    Ratify the Procedures.

    Quotes i intend to use:
    "I don't care what you think! *I'm* the one who has to determine what is fair"

    "Don't spit on my cupcake and tell me it's frosting."

    "Don't pee on my leg and tell me it's raining."
  2. Nobody

    Nobody Gangster

    Sep 14, 2001
    Wellington New Zealand
    Hey, its September the 1st here, so the court is now in session.

    I just stole Last terms procedures, lets ratify them or change them.
    I here by approve The Prodecures.
  3. Methos

    Methos HoF Quattromaster Super Moderator Hall of Fame Staff

    Jan 1, 2005
    Swearing in and I agree to our current Procedures.
  4. donsig

    donsig Low level intermediary

    Mar 6, 2001
    Rochester, NY
    I also agree to using last term's procedures.
  5. Nobody

    Nobody Gangster

    Sep 14, 2001
    Wellington New Zealand
    Well thats, that sorted, time to sit back and wait for the criminals to break the law.
  6. Nobody

    Nobody Gangster

    Sep 14, 2001
    Wellington New Zealand
    *cleans little hammer and whistles* just checking the docket... *files meaningless paper work*

Share This Page