Reuters says Germany and France are discussing Eurozone split: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/09/us-eurozone-future-sarkozy-idUSTRE7A85VV20111109
Reuters says Germany and France are discussing Eurozone split: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/09/us-eurozone-future-sarkozy-idUSTRE7A85VV20111109
The article was actually more interesting than its title implied.Reuters says Germany and France are discussing Eurozone split: http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/09/us-eurozone-future-sarkozy-idUSTRE7A85VV20111109
Yes, that's the reason why Kronic's title was ambiguous.I wonder what makes the French so sure they'll be part of it
I'm not really sure that Northern countries are really voluntary for this actually. I don't see any of Ireland, Finland or the Netherlands following such a move for more fiscal and budgetary convergence.Well, such a model would result in a Eurozone compromising the Northern countries + France. I can see that France may not be too interested in ending up in a currency zone with Southern Europe but being alone with Germany et al. doesn't seem too promising for France either, don't you think?
The real winners are bond traders. There were Anglo-Irish bank bonds for sale earlier in the year at 50-60% of their original value, anyone who bought them have now doubled their profit. The Irish government paid out 100% (700m last week and another 3-4 billion next year) despite them being unsecured and not covered by the bank guarantee, and the bank a failed bank that is being shut down. Apparently the ECB wouldn't let the Irish government even buy them at the discounted market rate to save some money.
I wonder what makes the French so sure they'll be part of it
2/ further integration among a leading group of countries within the Euro area.
Indeed, that third speed is about more fiscal integration and budgetary coordination between countries which would want it. As it is now, there's only Germany and France which have talked seriously about it. So for instance, it wouldn't be about Ireland being forced to raise its corporate taxes against its own will. Everyone agrees such a move could only turn very ugly and counter-productive.
The two-speed Europe is a reality since Britain decided to maintain itself in the European Union while rejecting the Euro.
Indeed, many economists genuinely wonder if the current plan consisting in maintaining Greece in the euro at all costs is the most suitable for both Greece and the eurozone. An exit of Greece from the eurozone wouldn't be so easy as many assume though. As it's quite obvious Greeks already started to protect their euros in Switzerland or under their mattresses by fear to see their savings getting evaporated by a return to the drachma.
The real winners are bond traders. There were Anglo-Irish bank bonds for sale earlier in the year at 50-60% of their original value, anyone who bought them have now doubled their profit. The Irish government paid out 100% (700m last week and another 3-4 billion next year) despite them being unsecured and not covered by the bank guarantee, and the bank a failed bank that is being shut down. Apparently the ECB wouldn't let the Irish government even buy them at the discounted market rate to save some money.
Why was Phillipos Petsalnikos was not chosen.
I hope he does well for Greece.
What are his views on the Republic of Macedonia. Increased trade with Macedonia would help Greece economically.
Oh, I don't know...It's not just Greece. The western world is exporting industry and jobs while millions of youths are unemployed and locked out of the same housing market that blew up a few years ago.
It's the 1% spreading the risk and making their money move over borders while the next generation is stuck in their parents basements making molotow coctails.
Really clever.