The Sixth Major Extinction

Bast

Protector of Cats
Joined
Jun 9, 2004
Messages
6,230
Location
Sydney, Australia
These are the five major classical extinction events widely agreed on by scientists:

1. Cretaceous–Tertiary extinction event (K-T extinction) - 65 Ma ago at the Cretaceous-Paleogene transition. About 17% of all families, 50% of all genera[4] and 75% of species went extinct.[citation needed] It ended the reign of dinosaurs and opened the way for mammals and birds to become the dominant land vertebrates. In the seas it reduced the percentage of sessile animals to about 33%. The K-T extinction was rather uneven — some groups of organisms became extinct, some suffered heavy losses and some appear to have been only minimally affected.
2. Triassic–Jurassic extinction event - 205 Ma at the Triassic-Jurassic transition. About 23% of all families and 48% of all genera (20% of marine families and 55% of marine genera) went extinct.[4] Most non-dinosaurian archosaurs, most therapsids, and most of the large amphibians were eliminated, leaving dinosaurs with little terrestrial competition. Non-dinosaurian archosaurs continued to dominate aquatic environments, while non-archosaurian diapsids continued to dominate marine environments. The Temnospondyl lineage of large amphibians also survived until the Cretaceous in Australia (e.g., Koolasuchus).
3. Permian–Triassic extinction event - 251 Ma at the Permian-Triassic transition. Earth's largest extinction killed 57% of all families and 83% of all genera[4] (53% of marine families, 84% of marine genera, about 96% of all marine species and an estimated 70% of land species) including vertebrates, insects and plants.[citation needed] The "Great Dying" had enormous evolutionary significance: on land, it ended the primacy of mammal-like reptiles. The recovery of vertebrates took 30 million years,[5] but the vacant niches created the opportunity for archosaurs to become ascendant. In the seas, the percentage of animals that were sessile dropped from 67% to 50%. The whole late Permian was a difficult time for at least marine life, even before the "Great Dying".
4. Late Devonian extinction 360-375 Ma near the Devonian-Carboniferous transition. At the end of the Frasnian Age in the later part(s) of the Devonian Period, a prolonged series of extinctions eliminated about 19% of all families, 50% of all genera[4] and 70% of all species.[citation needed] This extinction event lasted perhaps as long as 20 MY, and there is evidence for a series of extinction pulses within this period.
5. Ordovician–Silurian extinction event 440-450 Ma at the Ordovician-Silurian transition. Two events occurred that killed off 27% of all families and 57% of all genera.[4] Together they are ranked by many scientists as the second largest of the five major extinctions in Earth's history in terms of percentage of genera that went extinct.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extinction_event#Major_extinction_events

It's generally agreed that we are going through another and sixth major extinction event right now due to anthropogenic global warming.

I found this article in Scientific American particularly interesting. Especially the part I've lifted below:

It does not paint a pretty picture of what happens when CO2 levels rise. Terrestrial and marine life, such as tetrapods and pollinating plants, dwindled as a result of the sudden rise in CO2 levels in the atmosphere, with attendant ocean acidification. It remains to be seen who might benefit from today's ongoing sixth extinction and its related climate change, as theropod dinosaurs benefited from the end-Triassic extinction. But it usually isn't the dominant life forms on the planet at the time.

And another article:

Up to half of the planet would become uninhabitable by the 2300s with an average global temperature rise of 21.6 degrees Fahrenheit. This would make much larger regions into uninhabitable deserts than now. Humans would not be able to adapt or survive in such conditions.

What do you think? I think it's the beginning of the end for humans.
 
I'm nno bilogist, but I'm sure the start of the sixth extinction has nothing or very little to do with global warming. Isn't it supposed to have started with the extinction of the wooly mammoths 12,000 years ago?
 
lol, I just watched that movie today!
 
What do you think? I think it's the beginning of the end for humans.

Short of nuclear hellfire, no. However, it may be a temporary pause in seeing how many billions of people can occupy Earth. Main problem will be global warming's effect on food production. Though it remains to be seen if humans aren't smarter than tribolytes, and may thereby evade extinction.

I am willing to bet that Furries won't be the dominate force of life in 2300.

Moderator Action: Trolling.
Please read the forum rules: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=422889
 
It's generally agreed that we are going through another and sixth major extinction event right now due to anthropogenic global warming.
Maybe if you live next door to Daffy Duck and think that the Trilateral Commission is illegally broacasting Major League Baseball games from their pirate TV station on the moon.
 
Well we have the ability to manipulate our world unlike the Dinosaurs.
 
It's generally agreed that we are going through another and sixth major extinction event right now due to anthropogenic global warming.

...

What do you think? I think it's the beginning of the end for humans.

I think "generally agreed" does not mean what you think it means.
 
How can you compare events that led to the end of 75% of existing species to anything happening now? Seriously?
 
How can you compare events that led to the end of 75% of existing species to anything happening now? Seriously?

Well, to be fair, the vast majority of species diversity is not in large flora/fauna - we could probably wipe out 75% of existing species, and not notice a whole lot of difference in our everyday lives.
 
I'm nno bilogist, but I'm sure the start of the sixth extinction has nothing or very little to do with global warming. Isn't it supposed to have started with the extinction of the wooly mammoths 12,000 years ago?

Yeah it's less global warming and more "modern humans existing"
 
Back
Top Bottom